University Technology Incubator: Technology Transfer of Early Stage Technologies in Cross-Border Collaboration with Industry

Academia has established various technology transfer channels to support the technology transformation process. However, since universities are not expected to directly approach the market, either the established industry partners have to become involved, or new enterprises have to be developed. The established industry should be prepared for an efficient, early-stage technology transfer with development alliances right across boundaries. This paper looks at the preparation and implementation of the UTI at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETHZ) and aims to explore the specific strategic positioning and capabilities of a university technology incubator with focus on industry alliances. In a case study, the authors investigate technology screening, spin-off formation, and the alliance development phase as a collaborative innovation approach. The existing literature is reviewed and a university technology incubator method, as a “Broker of Technology”, is presented.

[1]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Incubator firm failure or graduation?: The role of university linkages , 2005 .

[2]  Sarfraz A. Mian,et al.  Assessing and managing the university technology business incubator: An integrative framework , 1997 .

[3]  Benn Lawson,et al.  Innovator'S Dilemma , 2015 .

[4]  Sean M. Hackett,et al.  A Systematic Review of Business Incubation Research , 2004 .

[5]  Alessandro Muscio,et al.  What drives the university use of technology transfer offices? Evidence from Italy , 2010 .

[6]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  University–incubator firm knowledge flows: assessing their impact on incubator firm performance , 2005 .

[7]  M. Fleischer,et al.  processes of technological innovation , 1990 .

[8]  Mariagrazia Squicciarini.  Science Parks’ tenants versus out-of-Park firms: who innovates more? A duration model , 2008 .

[9]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[10]  R. Chandy,et al.  The Incumbent's Curse? Incumbency, Size, and Radical Product Innovation , 2000 .

[11]  Andrew A. Toole,et al.  How does initial public financing influence private incentives for follow-on investment in early-stage technologies? , 2009 .

[12]  M. Fontes.  The process of transformation of scientific and technological knowledge into economic value conducted by biotechnology spin-offs , 2005 .

[13]  R. Siegwart,et al.  The Impact of Collaborative Innovation between Established Industry and Academic Technology Spin-offs , 2013 .

[14]  Erkko Autio,et al.  NEW, TECHNOLOGY-BASED FIRMS IN INNOVATION NETWORKS SYMPLECTIC AND GENERATIVE IMPACTS , 1997 .

[15]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[16]  Hans Löfsten,et al.  Science Park Location and New Technology-Based Firms in Sweden – Implications for Strategy and Performance , 2003 .

[17]  Mary Tripsas.  Customer preference discontinuities: a trigger for radical technological change , 2008 .

[18]  A. Sánchez,et al.  The development of university spin-offs: early dynamics of technology transfer and networking , 2003 .

[19]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  R&D Venture: proposition of a technology transfer concept for breakthrough technologies with R&D cooperation: A case study in the energy sector , 2013 .

[20]  Michael Schwartz,et al.  Beyond incubation: an analysis of firm survival and exit dynamics in the post-graduation period , 2009 .

[21]  Rikard Stankiewicz,et al.  Spin-off companies from universities , 1994 .

[22]  Hanadi Mubarak Al-Mubaraki,et al.  Business Incubators , 2010 .

[23]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industry-government networks , 2002 .

[24]  Thomas Ritter,et al.  The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance , 2006 .

[25]  Allen C. Bluedorn,et al.  The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management , 1999 .

[26]  C. Gilbert.  Unbundling the Structure of Inertia: Resource Versus Routine Rigidity , 2005 .

[27]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[28]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[29]  D. Mowery,et al.  Technology policy and global warming: Why new policy models are needed (or why putting new wine in old bottles won't work) , 2010 .

[30]  G. Rao,et al.  Open Innovation , 2019, Strategic Decisions.

[31]  A. Drejer.  Innovation and learning , 2003 .

[32]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[33]  John Yencken,et al.  Public research commercialisation, entrepreneurship and new technology based firms : an integrated model , 2004 .

[34]  Andrea Piccaluga,et al.  Exploitation and diffusion of public research: the case of academic spin-off companies in Italy , 2000 .

[35]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Corporate Incubators: Industrial R&D and What Universities can Learn from them , 2006 .

[36]  William S. Burlem.  Motivations for technology transfer , 1977 .

[37]  Anna Bergek,et al.  Incubator best practice: A framework , 2008 .

[38]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[39]  D. Gibson,et al.  Technology Transfer: A Communication Perspective , 1990 .

[40]  Massimo G. Colombo,et al.  How effective are technology incubators?: Evidence from Italy , 2002 .

[41]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[42]  J. Whitney.  Case Study Research , 1999 .

[43]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[44]  Lois S. Peters,et al.  The Role of Incubators in the Entrepreneurial Process , 2004 .

[45]  David V. Gibson,et al.  Overview of US incubators and the case of the Austin Technology Incubator , 2003 .

[46]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[47]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  The effects of business-university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: a study of publicly traded biotechnology companies , 2002 .

[48]  M. Marcelli,et al.  Design and Methods , 2011 .

[49]  Sylwia Męcfal.  Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[50]  H. Arnold,et al.  The Technology Radar - an Instrument of Technology Intelligence and Innovation Strategy , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology.

[51]  B. Clarysse,et al.  A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of a research-based spin-off , 2004 .