Exploring the effects of transducer models when training convolutional neural networks to eliminate reflection artifacts in experimental photoacoustic images

We previously proposed a method of removing reflection artifacts in photoacoustic images that uses deep learning. Our approach generally relies on using simulated photoacoustic channel data to train a convolutional neural network (CNN) that is capable of distinguishing sources from artifacts based on unique differences in their spatial impulse responses (manifested as depth-based differences in wavefront shapes). In this paper, we directly compare a CNN trained with our previous continuous transducer model to a CNN trained with an updated discrete acoustic receiver model that more closely matches an experimental ultrasound transducer. These two CNNs were trained with simulated data and tested on experimental data. The CNN trained using the continuous receiver model correctly classified 100% of sources and 70.3% of artifacts in the experimental data. In contrast, the CNN trained using the discrete receiver model correctly classified 100% of sources and 89.7% of artifacts in the experimental images. The 19.4% increase in artifact classification accuracy indicates that an acoustic receiver model that closely mimics the experimental transducer plays an important role in improving the classification of artifacts in experimental photoacoustic data. Results are promising for developing a method to display CNN-based images that remove artifacts in addition to only displaying network-identified sources as previously proposed.

[1]  B T Cox,et al.  k-Wave: MATLAB toolbox for the simulation and reconstruction of photoacoustic wave fields. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[2]  Roy G. M. Kolkman,et al.  In vivo photoacoustic imaging of blood vessels with a pulsed laser diode , 2006, Lasers in Medical Science.

[3]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition , 2014, ICLR.

[4]  Muyinatu A Lediju Bell,et al.  Design of a multifiber light delivery system for photoacoustic-guided surgery , 2017, Journal of biomedical optics.

[5]  P. Beard Biomedical photoacoustic imaging , 2011, Interface Focus.

[6]  Xu Xiao Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine , 2008 .

[7]  Jin U. Kang,et al.  In vivo visualization of prostate brachytherapy seeds with photoacoustic imaging , 2014, Journal of biomedical optics.

[8]  Kaiming He,et al.  Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  Stanislav Emelianov,et al.  Photoacoustic imaging of clinical metal needles in tissue. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[10]  Visvanathan Ramesh,et al.  Model-driven Simulations for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks , 2016, ArXiv.

[11]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Generative Adversarial Nets , 2014, NIPS.

[12]  Muyinatu A. Lediju Bell,et al.  A machine learning method to identify and remove reflection artifacts in photoacoustic channel data , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS).

[13]  Muyinatu A. Lediju Bell,et al.  A machine learning approach to identifying point source locations in photoacoustic data , 2017, BiOS.