Modifications to WRF's dynamical core to improve the treatment of moisture for large‐eddy simulations

Yamaguchi and Feingold (2012) note that the cloud fields in their large-eddy simulations (LESs) of marine stratocumulus using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model exhibit a strong sensitivity to time stepping choices. In this study, we reproduce and analyze this sensitivity issue using two stratocumulus cases, one marine and one continental. Results show that (1) the sensitivity is associated with spurious motions near the moisture jump between the boundary layer and the free atmosphere, and (2) these spurious motions appear to arise from neglecting small variations in water vapor mixing ratio (qv) in the pressure gradient calculation in the acoustic sub-stepping portion of the integration procedure. We show that this issue is remedied in the WRF dynamical core by replacing the prognostic equation for the potential temperature θ with one for the moist potential temperature θm=θ(1+1.61qv), which allows consistent treatment of moisture in the calculation of pressure during the acoustic sub-steps. With this modification, the spurious motions and the sensitivity to the time stepping settings (i.e., the dynamic time step length and number of acoustic sub-steps) are eliminated in both of the example stratocumulus cases. In conclusion, this modification improves the applicability of WRF for LES applications, and possibly more » other models using similar dynamical core formulations, and also permits the use of longer time steps than in the original code. « less

[1]  Krista Gaustad,et al.  CLOUDS AND MORE: ARM Climate Modeling Best Estimate Data , 2010 .

[2]  G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3 , 2008 .

[3]  J. Deardorff.  Stratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model , 1980 .

[4]  Robert Jackson,et al.  RACORO continental boundary layer cloud investigations: 2. Large‐eddy simulations of cumulus clouds and evaluation with in situ and ground‐based observations , 2015 .

[5]  Hailong Wang,et al.  Modeling Mesoscale Cellular Structures and Drizzle in Marine Stratocumulus. Part I: Impact of Drizzle on the Formation and Evolution of Open Cells , 2009 .

[6]  H. D. Orville,et al.  Bulk Parameterization of the Snow Field in a Cloud Model , 1983 .

[7]  G. Thompson,et al.  Impact of Cloud Microphysics on the Development of Trailing Stratiform Precipitation in a Simulated Squall Line: Comparison of One- and Two-Moment Schemes , 2009 .

[8]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulations of a Drizzling, Stratocumulus-Topped Marine Boundary Layer , 2009 .

[9]  D. Lilly,et al.  Supplement to Dynamics and Chemistry of Marine Stratocumulus—DYCOMS-II , 2003 .

[10]  Graham Feingold,et al.  Technical note: Large‐eddy simulation of cloudy boundary layer with the Advanced Research WRF model , 2012 .

[11]  G. Zängl,et al.  The ICON (ICOsahedral Non‐hydrostatic) modelling framework of DWD and MPI‐M: Description of the non‐hydrostatic dynamical core , 2015 .

[12]  W. Collins,et al.  Radiative forcing by long‐lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models , 2008 .

[13]  R. Hodur.  The Naval Research Laboratory’s Coupled Ocean/Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS) , 1997 .

[14]  Todd D. Ringler,et al.  A Multiscale Nonhydrostatic Atmospheric Model Using Centroidal Voronoi Tesselations and C-Grid Staggering , 2012 .

[15]  R. Pielke,et al.  A comprehensive meteorological modeling system—RAMS , 1992 .

[16]  Hailong Wang,et al.  Impact of subgrid‐scale radiative heating variability on the stratocumulus‐to‐trade cumulus transition in climate models , 2014 .

[17]  K. Droegemeier,et al.  The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS) – A multi-scale nonhydrostatic atmospheric simulation and prediction model. Part I: Model dynamics and verification , 2000 .

[18]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Evaluation of Large-Eddy Simulations via Observations of Nocturnal Marine Stratocumulus , 2005 .

[19]  Hailong Wang,et al.  Evaluation of Scalar Advection Schemes in the Advanced Research WRF Model Using Large-Eddy Simulations of Aerosol–Cloud Interactions , 2009 .

[20]  G. Feingold,et al.  Evaluation of Modeled Stratocumulus-Capped Boundary Layer Turbulence with Shipborne Data , 2013 .

[21]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Marine low cloud sensitivity to an idealized climate change: The CGILS LES intercomparison , 2013 .

[22]  D. Lilly,et al.  Dynamics and chemistry of marine stratocumulus - DYCOMS II , 2003 .

[23]  J. Dudhia,et al.  Examining Two-Way Grid Nesting for Large Eddy Simulation of the PBL Using the WRF Model , 2007 .

[24]  Shepard A. Clough,et al.  Retrieving Liquid Wat0er Path and Precipitable Water Vapor From the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Microwave Radiometers , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[25]  Hailong Wang,et al.  Modeling Mesoscale Cellular Structures and Drizzle in Marine Stratocumulus. Part II: The Microphysics and Dynamics of the Boundary Region between Open and Closed Cells , 2009 .

[26]  Jimy Dudhia,et al.  Conservative Split-Explicit Time Integration Methods for the Compressible Nonhydrostatic Equations , 2007 .