How Do Non-Ideal UAV Antennas Affect Air-to-Ground Communications?

Analysis of the performance of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-enabled communications systems often relies upon idealized antenna characteristic, where the side-lobe gain of UAVs' antenna is ignored. In practice, however, side-lobe cause inevitable interference to the ground users. We investigate the impact of UAVs' antenna side-lobe on the performance of UAV-enabled communication. Our analysis shows that even for a very small antenna's side-lobe gain, the ground receiver can experience substantial interference. We further show that a rather large exclusion zone is required to ensure a sufficient level of protection for the ground receiver. Nevertheless, in a multiple-antenna setting for the ground users, even when such a large exclusion zone was in place, UAVs' antenna side-lobe creates a high level of correlation among the interference signals received across receive antennas. Such a correlation limits the system ability to exploit channel diversity in a multiple-antenna setting for improving capacity. We then quantify the impact of UAVs' antenna side-lobes on the overall system performance by deriving the corresponding loss of the achieved capacity in various communications environments. We provide a new quantitative insight on the cost of adopting non-ideal UAV antenna on the overall capacity. Our analysis also shows that the capacity loss can be confined by careful selection of system parameters.

[1]  Rui Zhang,et al.  UAV-Aided Offloading for Cellular Hotspot , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[2]  Walid Saad,et al.  Wireless Communication Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): Optimal Transport Theory for Hover Time Optimization , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[3]  Chenyang Yang,et al.  UAV-Assisted Uplink Transmission for Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops).

[4]  Rui Zhang,et al.  Blocking Probability and Spatial Throughput Characterization for Cellular-Enabled UAV Network with Directional Antenna , 2017, ArXiv.

[5]  Rui Zhang,et al.  Wireless communications with unmanned aerial vehicles: opportunities and challenges , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[6]  Kandeepan Sithamparanathan,et al.  Optimal LAP Altitude for Maximum Coverage , 2014, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[7]  Sofie Pollin,et al.  LTE in the sky: trading off propagation benefits with interference costs for aerial nodes , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[8]  M. Cenk Gursoy,et al.  Downlink Analysis in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Assisted Cellular Networks With Clustered Users , 2018, IEEE Access.

[9]  Halim Yanikomeroglu,et al.  Efficient 3-D placement of an aerial base station in next generation cellular networks , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[10]  Ekram Hossain,et al.  Multi-Tier Drone Architecture for 5G/B5G Cellular Networks: Challenges, Trends, and Prospects , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[11]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Dual-Branch MRC Receivers in the Cellular Downlink under Spatial Interference Correlation , 2014 .

[12]  Xingqin Lin,et al.  The Sky Is Not the Limit: LTE for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[13]  Xingqin Lin,et al.  An Overview of 3GPP Release-15 Study on Enhanced LTE Support for Connected Drones , 2018, IEEE Communications Standards Magazine.