Two different Variants of Leg Repositioning at maximal Sprint Speed of high Performance Junior Sprinters

ABSTRACT Two variants of leg repositioning are described biomechanically and examined for differences in step kinematics. Based on leg angle (two-point angle between radius of leg centre of gravity and a horizontal line) during air phase, 30 juniors were divided into two groups (n = 15), large leg angle (LLA, leg angle = 80 ± 4°) and small leg angle (SLA, leg angle = 69 ± 5°). Maximal flying 30-m sprints were recorded (200 fps) and group differences were analysed using a 5-point leg model. With comparable leg length, both groups differed in leg moment of inertia and leg angular velocity. Group SLA reduced knee angle under the body, the thigh of swing leg passed the support leg early, and reached a higher position during knee lift, followed by a higher vertical foot velocity during pre-support. At take-on, both groups achieved a comparable hip, knee and foot angle. Due to higher mass of thigh (66%) compared to lower leg, foot and spikes (34%), thigh movement is essential for repositioning. Despite SLA advantages, three of the six fastest sprinters (v > 10.4 m/s) were evenly divided into both groups. An influence on step length, step frequency, ground contact and flight time was not found.

[1]  Matthew W Bundle,et al.  The fastest runner on artificial legs: different limbs, similar function? , 2009, Journal of applied physiology.

[2]  D. Kerwin,et al.  Sprint Running Performance and Technique Changes in Athletes During Periodized Training: An Elite Training Group Case Study. , 2017, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[3]  I. Hunter,et al.  Differences in technique between sprinters and distance runners at equal and maximal speeds , 2007, Sports biomechanics.

[4]  D. Dizdar,et al.  RELATIONS OF THE VARIABLES OF POWER AND MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS TO THE KINEMATIC INDICATORS OF MAXIMAL SPEED RUNNING , 2007 .

[5]  J. Morin,et al.  Sprint running performance: comparison between treadmill and field conditions , 2011, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[6]  Krzysztof Maćkała,et al.  Selected Determinants of Acceleration in the 100m Sprint , 2015, Journal of human kinetics.

[7]  R. Marshall,et al.  Interaction of step length and step rate during sprint running. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[8]  D. Kerwin,et al.  Elite sprinting: are athletes individually step-frequency or step-length reliant? , 2011, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.

[9]  Gerhard Prof. Dr.-Ing. et paed. habil Hochmuth,et al.  Biomechanics of athletic movement , 1984 .

[10]  P. Weyand,et al.  Faster top running speeds are achieved with greater ground forces not more rapid leg movements. , 2000, Journal of applied physiology.

[11]  Grant Trewartha,et al.  THE EFFECT OF DIGITAL FILTERING PROCEDURES ON KNEE JOINT MOMENTS IN SPRINTING , 2011 .

[12]  Julie R. Steele,et al.  Biomechanics of the Sprint Start , 1997, Sports medicine.

[13]  Ilse Jonkers,et al.  From block clearance to sprint running: Characteristics underlying an effective transition , 2013, Journal of sports sciences.

[14]  R. Marshall,et al.  Segment-interaction analysis of the stance limb in sprint running. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  M A Thompson,et al.  Physiological and Biomechanical Mechanisms of Distance Specific Human Running Performance. , 2017, Integrative and comparative biology.

[16]  G. Ettema,et al.  On the Importance of "Front-Side Mechanics" in Athletics Sprinting. , 2017, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[17]  R. Marshall,et al.  Relationships between ground reaction force impulse and kinematics of sprint-running acceleration. , 2005, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[18]  S. Riek,et al.  Neural Influences on Sprint Running , 2001, Sports medicine.

[19]  W. Shen THE EFFECTS OF STRIDE LENGTH AND FREQUENCY ON THE SPEEDS OF ELITE SPRINTERS IN 100 METER DASH , 2000 .

[20]  E. Tønnessen,et al.  9.58 and 10.49: nearing the citius end for 100 m? , 2015, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[21]  M. Bourdin,et al.  Mechanical determinants of 100-m sprint running performance , 2012, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[22]  A. Mero,et al.  A Kinematics Analysis Of Three Best 100 M Performances Ever , 2013, Journal of human kinetics.

[23]  D. Lehénaff,et al.  Evolution of stride and amplitude during course o f t h e 100 m event in athletics , 2006 .

[24]  I. Jonkers,et al.  The Contribution of Step Characteristics to Sprint Running Performance in High-Level Male and Female Athletes , 2013, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[25]  N. Mancini,et al.  Biomechanics of sprint running: a methodological contribution , 2013 .

[26]  Ralph Mann,et al.  KINETICS OF SPRINTING , 1983 .

[27]  R J Gregor,et al.  Biomechanics of Sprint Running , 1992, Sports medicine.

[28]  Krzysztof Mackala,et al.  Optimisation of performance through kinematic analysis of the different phases of the 100 metres , 2007 .

[29]  Günter Tidow,et al.  Relative activity of hip and knee extensors in sprinting - implications for training , 1995 .

[30]  G. Trewartha,et al.  Understanding the effect of touchdown distance and ankle joint kinematics on sprint acceleration performance through computer simulation , 2015, Sports biomechanics.