Characterizing intimate mixtures of materials in hyperspectral imagery with albedo-based and kernel-based approaches

Linear mixtures of materials in a scene often occur because the pixel size of a sensor is relatively large and consequently they contain patches of different materials within them. This type of mixing can be thought of as areal mixing and modeled by a linear mixture model with certain constraints on the abundances. The solution to these models has received a lot of attention. However, there are more complex situations, such as scattering that occurs in mixtures of vegetation and soil, or intimate mixing of granular materials like soils. Such multiple scattering and microscopic mixtures within pixels have varying degrees of non-linearity. In such cases, a linear model is not sufficient. Furthermore, often enough, scenes may contain cases of both linear and non-linear mixing on a pixel-by-pixel basis. This study considers two approaches for use as generalized methods for un-mixing pixels in a scene that may be linear (areal mixed) or non-linear (intimately mixed). The first method is based on earlier studies that indicate non-linear mixtures in reflectance space are approximately linear in albedo space. The method converts reflectance to singlescattering albedo (SSA) according to Hapke theory assuming bidirectional scattering at nadir look angles and uses a constrained linear model on the computed albedo values. The second method is motivated by the same idea, but uses a kernel that seeks to capture the linear behavior of albedo in non-linear mixtures of materials. The behavior of the kernel method is dependent on the value of a parameter, gamma. Furthermore, both methods are dependent on the choice of endmembers, and also on RMSE (root mean square error) as a performance metric. This study compares the two approaches and pays particular attention to these dependencies. Both laboratory and aerial collections of hyperspectral imagery are used to validate the methods.

[1]  Robert S. Rand A physically constrained localized linear mixing model for TERCAT applications , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[2]  D. Anderson,et al.  Algorithms for minimization without derivatives , 1974 .

[3]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Kernel fully constrained least squares abundance estimates , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[4]  A. Atiya,et al.  Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[5]  Elizabeth A. Peck,et al.  Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis , 2001 .

[6]  Raymond F. Kokaly,et al.  A method for quantitative mapping of thick oil spills using imaging spectroscopy , 2010 .

[7]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Fully constrained least squares linear spectral mixture analysis method for material quantification in hyperspectral imagery , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Kernel-based methods for hyperspectral image classification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  Amit Banerjee,et al.  A generalized kernel for areal and intimate mixtures , 2010, 2010 2nd Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing.

[10]  Jammalamadaka Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis (3rd ed.) , 2003 .

[11]  J. Brian Gray,et al.  Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis , 2002, Technometrics.

[12]  Robert S. Rand,et al.  Feature-based and statistical methods for analyzing the Deepwater Horizon oil spill with AVIRIS imagery , 2011, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[13]  Ronald G. Resmini,et al.  Constrained energy minimization applied to apparent reflectance and single-scattering albedo spectra: a comparison , 1996, Optics + Photonics.

[14]  John F. Mustard,et al.  Photometric phase functions of common geologic minerals and applications to quantitative analysis of mineral mixture reflectance spectra , 1989 .

[15]  Paul E. Johnson,et al.  Spectral mixture modeling: A new analysis of rock and soil types at the Viking Lander 1 Site , 1986 .

[16]  Bo-Cai Gao,et al.  Development of a line-by-line-based atmosphere removal algorithm for airborne and spaceborne imaging spectrometers , 1997, Optics & Photonics.

[17]  Robert S. Rand,et al.  An analysis of the nonlinear spectral mixing of didymium and soda-lime glass beads using hyperspectral imagery (HSI) microscopy , 2014, Defense + Security Symposium.

[18]  Amit Banerjee,et al.  Automated endmember determination and adaptive spectral mixture analysis using kernel methods , 2013, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[19]  J. Freud Theory Of Reflectance And Emittance Spectroscopy , 2016 .

[20]  Amit Banerjee,et al.  A comparison of kernel functions for intimate mixture models , 2009, 2009 First Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing.

[21]  Heesung Kwon,et al.  Kernel matched subspace detectors for hyperspectral target detection , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[22]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Unmixing hyperspectral intimate mixtures , 2010, Remote Sensing.

[23]  Amit Banerjee,et al.  Mapping intimate mixtures using an adaptive kernel-based technique , 2011, 2011 3rd Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS).

[24]  Z. Ahmad,et al.  Atmospheric correction algorithm for hyperspectral remote sensing of ocean color from space. , 2000, Applied optics.

[25]  John F. Mustard,et al.  Reflectance Spectra of Five-Component Mineral Mixtures: Implications for Mixture Modeling , 1996 .

[26]  John R. Schott,et al.  Remote Sensing: The Image Chain Approach , 1996 .

[27]  Robert S. Rand,et al.  A spectral mixture process conditioned by Gibbs-based partitioning , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..