Bayesian multi-dipole modelling of a single topography in MEG by adaptive sequential Monte Carlo samplers

In this paper, we develop a novel Bayesian approach to the problem of estimating neural currents in the brain from a fixed distribution of magnetic field (called topography), measured by magnetoencephalography. Differently from recent studies that describe inversion techniques, such as spatio-temporal regularization/filtering, in which neural dynamics always plays a role, we face here a purely static inverse problem. Neural currents are modelled as an unknown number of current dipoles, whose state space is described in terms of a variable-dimension model. Within the resulting Bayesian framework, we set up a sequential Monte Carlo sampler to explore the posterior distribution. An adaptation technique is employed in order to effectively balance the computational cost and the quality of the sample approximation. Then, both the number and the parameters of the unknown current dipoles are simultaneously estimated. The performance of the method is assessed by means of synthetic data, generated by source configurations containing up to four dipoles. Eventually, we describe the results obtained by analysing data from a real experiment, involving somatosensory evoked fields, and compare them to those provided by three other methods.

[1]  E. Halgren,et al.  Dynamic Statistical Parametric Mapping Combining fMRI and MEG for High-Resolution Imaging of Cortical Activity , 2000, Neuron.

[2]  C. Campi,et al.  A Rao–Blackwellized particle filter for magnetoencephalography , 2008 .

[3]  G. Sandini,et al.  Graph theoretical analysis of magnetoencephalographic functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  Arnaud Doucet,et al.  An adaptive sequential Monte Carlo method for approximate Bayesian computation , 2011, Statistics and Computing.

[5]  M. Aschwanden,et al.  The RHESSI Imaging Concept , 2002 .

[6]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Independent component analysis of short-time Fourier transforms for spontaneous EEG/MEG analysis , 2010, NeuroImage.

[7]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Dynamic filtering of static dipoles in magnetoencephalography , 2013 .

[8]  Fa-Hsuan Lin,et al.  Sparse current source estimation for MEG using loose orientation constraints , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[9]  Eric Moulines,et al.  Inference in hidden Markov models , 2010, Springer series in statistics.

[10]  Darren Price,et al.  Investigating the electrophysiological basis of resting state networks using magnetoencephalography , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Statistical and computational inverse problems , 2004 .

[12]  Haikady N. Nagaraja,et al.  Inference in Hidden Markov Models , 2006, Technometrics.

[13]  Michele Piana,et al.  Highly Automated Dipole EStimation (HADES) , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[14]  R D Pascual-Marqui,et al.  Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. , 2002, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[15]  H. Berendse,et al.  Slowing of oscillatory brain activity is a stable characteristic of Parkinson's disease without dementia. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  S. Taulu,et al.  Suppression of Interference and Artifacts by the Signal Space Separation Method , 2003, Brain Topography.

[17]  J. Sarvas Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  V. Jousmäki,et al.  Activation of a distributed somatosensory cortical network in the human brain. A dipole modelling study of magnetic fields evoked by median nerve stimulation. Part I: Location and activation timing of SEF sources. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  David Holcman,et al.  Time scale of diffusion in molecular and cellular biology , 2014 .

[20]  Norman Badler,et al.  Spherical Sampling by Archimedes' Theorem , 1996 .

[21]  M. Morino,et al.  sLORETA-qm for interictal MEG epileptic spike analysis: Comparison of location and quantity with equivalent dipole estimation , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[22]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Non-stationary magnetoencephalography by Bayesian filtering of dipole models , 2003 .

[23]  Faming Liang,et al.  Statistical and Computational Inverse Problems , 2006, Technometrics.

[24]  Alberto Sorrentino,et al.  Particle Filters for Magnetoencephalography , 2010 .

[25]  Ba-Ngu Vo,et al.  A Consistent Metric for Performance Evaluation of Multi-Object Filters , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[26]  Lauri Parkkonen,et al.  Dynamical MEG source modeling with multi‐target Bayesian filtering , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[27]  George Dassios,et al.  On the non-uniqueness of the inverse MEG problem , 2005 .

[28]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Multi-Dipole Modeling in MEG , 2010 .

[29]  Reuven Y. Rubinstein,et al.  Simulation and the Monte Carlo method , 1981, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics.

[30]  P. Moral,et al.  Sequential Monte Carlo samplers , 2002, cond-mat/0212648.

[31]  Matthew T. Sutherland,et al.  Reliable detection of bilateral activation in human primary somatosensory cortex by unilateral median nerve stimulation , 2006, NeuroImage.

[32]  P. Green Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination , 1995 .

[33]  A. S. Fokas,et al.  The unique determination of neuronal currents in the brain via magnetoencephalography , 2004 .

[34]  Sergey M. Plis,et al.  Spatiotemporal Bayesian inference dipole analysis for MEG neuroimaging data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[35]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[36]  M. Piana,et al.  Highly Automated Dipole EStimation , 2010 .

[37]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Comparison of Minimum Current Estimate and Dipole Modeling in the Analysis of Simulated Activity in the Human Visual Cortices , 2002, NeuroImage.