Multivariate GP-VAR models for robust structural identification under operational variability

Abstract While the concept of structural monitoring has been around for a number of decades, it remains under-exploited in practice. A main driver for this shortcoming lies in the difficulty to robustly and autonomously interpret the information that is extracted from dynamic data. This hindrance in properly deciphering the collected information may be attributed to the uncertainty that is inherent in i) the finite set of measured data, ii) the models employed for capturing the manifested dynamics, and more importantly, iii) the susceptibility of these systems to variations in Environmental and Operational Parameters (EOPs). In previous work of the authors, a Gaussian Process (GP) time-series approach has been introduced, which serves as a hierarchical input–output method to account for the influence of EOPs on structural response. This in turn enables a robust structural identification. In this scheme, the short-term dynamics are modeled by means of linear-in-the-parameters time-series models, while EOV dependence – acting on a long-term time scale – is achieved via GP regression of the model coefficients on measured EOPs. This work corresponds to a further advancement on this modeling approach, corresponding to its generalization to the vector response case. Particularly, the problem of global identification here is solved via an Expectation–Maximization algorithm tailored to the GP time-series model structure. Moreover, an EOP-dependent innovations covariance matrix is integrated in the model, which helps to capture variation in the vibration power. The resulting model does not only have the capability to represent the long-term response of a structure under variable EOPs, but also facilitates the enhanced tracking of modal quantities in contrast to traditional operational modal analysis techniques. The proposed approach is exemplified on the identification of the vibration response of a simulated wind turbine blade at different points along the blade axis in the flap-wise direction, under variability of both the acting wind speeds and ambient temperatures.

[1]  G. De Roeck,et al.  Vibration based Structural Health Monitoring using output-only measurements under changing environment , 2008 .

[2]  Maya R. Gupta,et al.  Theory and Use of the EM Algorithm , 2011, Found. Trends Signal Process..

[3]  Spilios D. Fassois,et al.  In-Operation Wind Turbine Modal Analysis via LPV-VAR Modeling , 2017 .

[4]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Effects of environmental and operational variability on structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[5]  S. Alampalli,et al.  EFFECTS OF TESTING, ANALYSIS, DAMAGE, AND ENVIRONMENT ON MODAL PARAMETERS , 2000 .

[6]  Edwin Reynders,et al.  Output-only structural health monitoring in changing environmental conditions by means of nonlinear system identification , 2014 .

[7]  Eleni Chatzi,et al.  Polynomial chaos expansion models for the monitoring of structures under operational variability , 2016 .

[8]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions—Part I: A linear analysis , 2005 .

[9]  Spilios D. Fassois,et al.  Gaussian Mixture Random Coefficient model based framework for SHM in structures with time–dependent dynamics under uncertainty , 2017 .

[10]  Keith Worden,et al.  Cointegration and why it works for SHM , 2012 .

[11]  Keith Worden,et al.  On robust regression analysis as a means of exploring environmental and operational conditions for SHM data , 2015 .

[12]  Daniel Straub,et al.  Value of information: A roadmap to quantifying the benefit of structural health monitoring , 2017 .

[13]  Spilios D. Fassois,et al.  Damage/fault diagnosis in an operating wind turbine under uncertainty via a vibration response Gaussian mixture random coefficient model based framework , 2017 .

[14]  Fotis Kopsaftopoulos,et al.  A stochastic global identification framework for aerospace structures operating under varying flight states , 2018 .

[15]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Novelty detection in a changing environment: Regression and interpolation approaches , 2002 .

[16]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  The fundamental axioms of structural health monitoring , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[17]  James M. W. Brownjohn,et al.  Gaussian Process Time-Series Models for Structures under Operational Variability , 2017, Front. Built Environ..

[18]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring and Reliability Estimation: Long Span Truss Bridge Application With Environmental Monitoring Data , 2008 .

[19]  Keith Worden,et al.  A regime-switching cointegration approach for removing environmental and operational variations in structural health monitoring , 2018 .

[20]  Eleni Chatzi,et al.  A Data-Driven Diagnostic Framework for Wind Turbine Structures: A Holistic Approach , 2017, Sensors.

[21]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Online automatic identification of the modal parameters of a long span arch bridge , 2009 .

[22]  Spilios D. Fassois,et al.  Functionally Pooled models for the global identification of stochastic systems under different pseudo-static operating conditions , 2016 .

[23]  Eleni Chatzi,et al.  Sensitivity driven robust vibration-based damage diagnosis under uncertainty through hierarchical Bayes time-series representations , 2017 .

[24]  Laurent Mevel,et al.  Merging Sensor Data from Multiple Temperature Scenarios for Vibration Monitoring of Civil Structures , 2008 .