Modeling Visual Problem Solving as Analogical Reasoning
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Wertheimer. Laws of organization in perceptual forms. , 1938 .
[2] J. Raven,et al. Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales , 1962 .
[3] R. Cattell. Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. , 1963 .
[4] H. R. Burke,et al. Raven's Progressive Matrices: More on Construct Validity. , 1969 .
[5] R. Shepard,et al. Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.
[6] R. Sternberg. Intelligence, Information Processing and Analogical Reasoning : The Componential Analysis of Human Abilities , 1977 .
[7] D. Navon. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.
[8] S. Palmer. Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.
[9] D. Marr,et al. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.
[10] J. Wolfe,et al. The order of visual processing: “Top-down,” “bottom-up,” or “middle-out” , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.
[11] J. Grudin. Processes in Verbal Analogy Solution. , 1980 .
[12] R. Glaser,et al. Components of geometric analogy solution , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[13] J. Arbit,et al. Structure of a Psychodiagnostic Test Battery for Children. , 1980 .
[14] W. McKeachie. Implications of cognitive psychology for college teaching , 1980 .
[15] R. Maki. Why do categorization effects occur in comparative judgment tasks? , 1982, Memory & cognition.
[16] R. Shepard,et al. Mental Images and Their Transformations , 1982 .
[17] K. Holyoak,et al. Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.
[18] D. Gentner. Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy* , 1983 .
[19] Kenneth D. Forbus. Qualitative Reasoning About Space and Motion , 1983 .
[20] B. Julesz. A brief outline of the texton theory of human vision , 1984, Trends in Neurosciences.
[21] Donald D. Hoffman,et al. Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.
[22] M. Bornstein,et al. Discrimination and matching within and between hues measured by reaction times: some implications for categorical perception and levels of information processing , 1984, Psychological research.
[23] C. E. Bethell-Fox,et al. Adaptive reasoning: Componential and eye movement analysis of geometric analogy performance ☆ , 1984 .
[24] S. Ullman. Visual routines , 1984, Cognition.
[25] B. Farell,et al. Same-different judgments: a review of current controversies in perceptual comparisons. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.
[26] Brian Falkenhainer,et al. The Structure-Mapping Engine * , 2003 .
[27] I. Biederman. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.
[28] Brian Falkenhainer,et al. The Structure-Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Examples , 1989, Artif. Intell..
[29] C. B. Cave,et al. Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[30] R. Snow,et al. Implications of cognitive psychology for educational measurement. , 1989 .
[31] M A Just,et al. From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1990 What one intelligence test measures : A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test , 2016 .
[32] Richard G. Kurial,et al. Representation and recognition , 1990 .
[33] Robert L. Goldstone,et al. Relational similarity and the nonindependence of features in similarity judgments , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.
[34] H. C. Nothdurft,et al. Texture segmentation and pop-out from orientation contrast , 1991, Vision Research.
[35] Kenneth D. Forbus,et al. Qualitative Spatial Reasoning: The Clock Project , 1991, Artif. Intell..
[36] L. Hedges,et al. Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location. , 1991, Psychological review.
[37] I. Biederman,et al. Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.
[38] G. Halford. Analogical Reasoning and Conceptual Complexity in Cognitive Development , 1992 .
[39] L. Lagasse,et al. Effects of good form and spatial frequency on global precedence , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.
[40] M. W. Molen,et al. Error analysis of raven test performance , 1994 .
[41] S. Palmer,et al. Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[42] D. Gentner,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article STRUCTURAL ALIGNMENT IN COMPARISON: No Difference Without Similarity , 2022 .
[43] D. Hofstadter. Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies: Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought, Douglas Hofstadter. 1994. Basic Books, New York, NY. 512 pages. ISBN: 0-465-05154-5. $30.00 , 1995 .
[44] K. A. Ericsson,et al. Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.
[45] M. Goodale. Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate , 1995 .
[46] J. Hummel,et al. An architecture for rapid, hierarchical structural description , 1996 .
[47] D. Gentner,et al. Commonalities and differences in similarity comparisons , 1996, Memory & cognition.
[48] R. W. Ferguson,et al. Modeling Qualitative Differences in Symmetry Judgments , 1996 .
[49] H. Hughes,et al. Global Precedence, Spatial Frequency Channels, and the Statistics of Natural Images , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[50] John E. Hummel,et al. Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. , 1997 .
[51] Arthur B. Markman,et al. Analogical Reasoning and Conceptual Change: A Case Study of Johannes Kepler , 1997 .
[52] S. Embretson. A cognitive design system approach to generating valid tests : Application to abstract reasoning , 1998 .
[53] Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al. A Structural Account of Global and Local Processing , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.
[54] Kenneth D. Forbus,et al. SEQL: Category learning as progressive abstraction using structure mapping , 2000 .
[55] Kenneth D. Forbus,et al. Exploring analogy in the large , 2000 .
[56] J. Hulleman,et al. Concavities as basic features in visual search: Evidence from search asymmetries , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.
[57] J. L. Ellis,et al. A Rasch analysis of Raven’s standard progressive matrices , 2000 .
[58] E. Cooper,et al. Categorical perception of relative orientation in visual object recognition , 2001, Memory & cognition.
[59] S. Hochstein,et al. View from the Top Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System , 2002, Neuron.
[60] N. Chater,et al. Similarity as transformation , 2003, Cognition.
[61] Kenneth D. Forbus,et al. A Theory of Rerepresentation in Analogical Matching , 2003 .
[62] Robert M. French,et al. Computational Models of Analogy-Making , 2003 .
[63] Bradley C. Love,et al. CAB: Connectionist Analogy Builder , 2003, Cogn. Sci..
[64] Margaret A. Boden,et al. Douglas Hofstadter and the Fluid Analogies Research Group, Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies: Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought , 2004, Minds and Machines.
[65] John E. Hummel,et al. Varieties of sameness: the impact of relational complexity on perceptual comparisons , 2004, Cogn. Sci..
[66] K. A. Stevens. The information content of texture gradients , 1981, Biological Cybernetics.
[67] J. Allik,et al. Sex Differences on Three Factors Identified in Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices , 2004 .
[68] R. Engle,et al. Working memory capacity and fluid abilities: Examining the correlation between Operation Span and Raven , 2005 .
[69] R. Engle,et al. Individual differences in working memory capacity and learning: Evidence from the serial reaction time task , 2005, Memory & cognition.
[70] Robert L. Goldstone,et al. The Transfer of Scientific Principles Using Concrete and Idealized Simulations , 2005, Journal of the Learning Sciences.
[71] John Eustis Williams,et al. Equivalence of standard and computerized versions of the Raven Progressive Matrices Test , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[72] E. Spelke,et al. Core Knowledge of Geometry in an Amazonian Indigene Group , 2006, Science.
[73] U. Andersson. The contribution of working memory to children's mathematical word problem solving , 2007 .
[74] Vladimir M Sloutsky,et al. The Advantage of Abstract Examples in Learning Math , 2008, Science.
[75] Derek C. Penn,et al. Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[76] Leonidas A A Doumas,et al. A theory of the discovery and predication of relational concepts. , 2008, Psychological review.
[77] Alvaro J. Arce-Ferrer,et al. Studying the Equivalence of Computer-Delivered and Paper-Based Administrations of the Raven Standard Progressive Matrices Test , 2009 .
[78] Kenneth D. Forbus,et al. Solving Geometric Analogy Problems Through Two-Stage Analogical Mapping , 2009, Cogn. Sci..
[79] H. Gust,et al. Solving Geometric Proportional Analogies with the Analogy Model HDTP , 2009 .
[80] Dedre Gentner,et al. Bootstrapping the Mind: Analogical Processes and Symbol Systems , 2010, Cogn. Sci..
[81] Simone Cirillo,et al. An Anthropomorphic Solver for Raven's Progressive Matrices , 2010 .
[82] Robert L. Goldstone,et al. Categorical perception. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.
[83] C. Geiser,et al. On the relationship between solution strategies in two mental rotation tasks , 2010 .
[84] Kenneth D. Forbus,et al. Organizing and Representing Space for Visual Problem-Solving , 2011 .
[85] Kenneth D. Forbus,et al. Edge-cycles: A qualitative sketch representation to support recognition , 2011 .
[86] Kenneth D. Forbus,et al. CogSketch: Sketch Understanding for Cognitive Science Research and for Education , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[87] Chris Eliasmith,et al. A Neural Model of Rule Generation in Inductive Reasoning , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[88] A. Lovett,et al. Cultural commonalities and differences in spatial problem-solving: A computational analysis , 2011, Cognition.
[89] Kenneth D. Forbus,et al. Modeling Multiple Strategies for Solving Geometric Analogy Problems , 2012, CogSci.
[90] Irving Biederman,et al. Greater sensitivity to nonaccidental than metric changes in the relations between simple shapes in the lateral occipital cortex , 2012, NeuroImage.
[91] Eyal Sagi,et al. What Difference Reveals About Similarity , 2012, Cogn. Sci..
[92] D. Gentner,et al. Analogical Learning and Reasoning , 2013 .
[93] Maithilee Kunda,et al. A computational model for solving problems from the Raven’s Progressive Matrices intelligence test using iconic visual representations , 2013, Cognitive Systems Research.
[94] D. Hofstadter,et al. Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking , 2013 .
[95] J. Hummel,et al. Comparison and Mapping Facilitate Relation Discovery and Predication , 2013, PloS one.
[96] K. Holyoak,et al. Far-Out Thinking , 2014, Psychological science.
[97] Maithilee Kunda,et al. Fractals and Ravens , 2014, Artif. Intell..
[98] N. Taatgen. Between architecture and model: Strategies for cognitive control , 2014, BICA 2014.
[99] Hongjing Lu,et al. Animation Facilitates Source Understanding and Spontaneous Analogical Transfer , 2015, CogSci.
[100] R. Levy,et al. General and specialized brain correlates for analogical reasoning: A meta‐analysis of functional imaging studies , 2016, Human brain mapping.
[101] Annett Wechsler. Analogy Making As Perception A Computer Model , 2016 .