Speech Aerodynamics and Nasalance in Oral Cancer Patients Treated with Microvascular Transfers

The purpose of the current study was to assess speech aerodynamics and nasal acoustic energy during a follow-up period of 12 months in patients having undergone microvascular free flap reconstruction after tumor ablation from the oral cavity or oropharynx, usually followed by radiotherapy. Velopharyngeal function was assessed in terms of velopharyngeal orifice size by a pressure-flow measurement technique as well as by determining the instrumental correlate of perceived nasality (i.e., nasalance) during speech production. Velopharyngeal closure and nasalance were estimated to be adequate before operation both in oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer patients. After the operation, at the group level, the oral cavity patients showed adequate velopharyngeal closure and nasalance. In contrast, the postoperative velopharynx orifice size was significantly bigger in the oropharyngeal cancer patients as compared with the oral cavity patients 6 months after operation. However, based on average aerodynamic as well as the nasalance data, the impairment of velopharyngeal function was not regarded clinically significant at the group level in either group of patients. The present treatment protocol served to maintain the prerequisites for normal or close to normal speech physiology.

[1]  M. Haapanen.  Nasalance scores in normal Finnish speech. , 1991, Folia phoniatrica.

[2]  Alan A Wrench,et al.  Objective Assessment of Speech after Surgical Treatment for Oral Cancer: Experience from 196 Selected Cases , 2004, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[3]  H. Pillsbury,et al.  Effects of size of the nasal airway on nasal airflow rate. , 1987, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[4]  A. Rademaker,et al.  Swallowing and speech ability after treatment for head and neck cancer with targeted intraarterial versus intravenous chemoradiation , 2002, Head & neck.

[5]  R Sader,et al.  Speech evaluation and swallowing ability after intra‐oral cancer , 2003, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[6]  P. Dulguerov,et al.  Quality of life in patients with oropharynx carcinomas: Assessment after accelerated radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy versus radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy , 2003, Head & neck.

[7]  H. Morris,et al.  Correspondence between nasalance scores and listener judgments of hypernasality and hyponasality. , 1992, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[8]  R. Dalston,et al.  Use of nasometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairment. , 1991, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[9]  R. Dalston,et al.  Hypernasality and velopharyngeal impairment. , 1994, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[10]  T. Kotz,et al.  Swallowing dysfunction after chemoradiation for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck , 2004, Head & neck.

[11]  D. W. Warren,et al.  A PRESSURE-FLOW TECHNIQUE FOR MEASURING VELOPHARYNGEAL ORIFICE AREA DURING CONTINUOUS SPEECH. , 1964, The Cleft palate journal.

[12]  D. W. Warren.  Perci: a method for rating palatal efficiency. , 1979, The Cleft palate journal.

[13]  D. Zajac.  Pressure-flow characteristics of /m/ and /p/ production in speakers without cleft palate: developmental findings. , 2000, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[14]  R. Dalston,et al.  Screening of velopharyngeal closure based on nasal airflow rate measurements. , 1988, The Cleft palate journal.

[15]  Naresh Jha,et al.  Functional Outcomes After Primary Oropharyngeal Cancer Resection and Reconstruction With the Radial Forearm Free Flap , 2003, The Laryngoscope.

[16]  D. W. Warren,et al.  The relationship between nasal airway cross-sectional area and nasal resistance. , 1987, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[17]  S. Ozawa,et al.  The pattern of tongue pressure against the palate during articulating glossal sounds in normal subjects and glossectomy patients. , 2004, Journal of medical and dental sciences.

[18]  A. Wrench,et al.  Chewing and swallowing after surgical treatment for oral cancer: functional evaluation in 196 selected cases. , 2004, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

[19]  A. Isberg,et al.  Intraoral sensation before and after radiotherapy and surgery for oral and pharyngeal cancer , 2004, Head and Neck.

[20]  R. Dalston,et al.  The aerodynamic characteristics of speech produced by normal speakers and cleft palate speakers with adequate velopharyngeal function. , 1990, The Cleft palate journal.

[21]  B E Smith,et al.  Pressure-flow measurements for selected oral and nasal sound segments produced by normal adults. , 1991, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[22]  Tara L. Whitehill,et al.  Consonant intelligibility and tongue motility in patients with partial glossectomy. , 2004, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[24]  Jessica E. Huber,et al.  The control of aerodynamics, acoustics, and perceptual characteristics during speech production. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  R. Mayo,et al.  Aerodynamic and temporal aspects of velopharyngeal function in normal speakers. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[26]  R. Dalston,et al.  Nasometric sensitivity and specificity: a cross-dialect and cross-culture study. , 1993, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[27]  A. Rademaker,et al.  Functional results of primary closure vs flaps in oropharyngeal reconstruction: a prospective study of speech and swallowing. , 1998, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[28]  The influence of oral cavity tumour treatment on the voice quality and on fundamental frequency , 2003, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[29]  Trost Je.  Articulatory additions to the classical description of the speech of persons with cleft palate. , 1981 .

[30]  A. Perry,et al.  Evaluation of speech in people with head and neck cancer: a pilot study. , 2003, International journal of language & communication disorders.