A meta‐analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning

This meta‐analysis reviews the findings of 81 studies (N=24,474) examining the relationship between teachers' verbal or nonverbal immediacy (or both) and students' learning outcomes. The cumulative evidence indicates meaningful correlations between teachers' nonverbal immediacy and student reports of perceived learning (r=.51) and affective learning (r=.49), but only a slight correlation with students' performance on cognitive learning measures (r=.17). Teachers' verbal immediacy was found to correlate with students' perceived learning (r=.49) and affective learning (r=.49), but again the relationship with performed cognitive learning was notably smaller (r=.06). Average effect sizes were generally smaller in experimental research designs than in survey‐type research, and generally larger when verbal/nonverbal immediacy was measured as a single construct. The cumulative results of this meta‐analysis confirm that teacher immediacy has a substantial relationship with certain attitudes and perceptions of students in relation to their learning, but a modest relationship with cognitive learning performance.

[1]  B. Bloom.  Taxonomy of educational objectives , 1956 .

[2]  J. M. Kittross.  The measurement of meaning , 1959 .

[3]  Chester A. Insko,et al.  Theories of attitude change , 1967 .

[4]  A. Mehrabian.  Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior , 1968 .

[5]  Joan Miller,et al.  Influencing attitudes and changing behavior , 1970 .

[6]  J. Kleinfeld.  Using Nonverbal Warmth to Increase Learning: A Cross-Cultural Experiment. ISEGR Research Note. , 1973 .

[7]  Michael D. Scott,et al.  Communication apprehension, student attitudes, and levels of satisfaction , 1977 .

[8]  A. Woolfolk.  Student learning and performance under varying conditions of teacher verbal and nonverbal evaluative communication. , 1978 .

[9]  Edward E. Jones,et al.  Interpersonal attraction. 2nd ed. , 1978 .

[10]  J. F. Andersen.  Teacher Immediacy as a Predictor of Teaching Effectiveness , 1979 .

[11]  Earl E. McDowell.  A Multivariate Study of Teacher Immediacy, Teaching Effectiveness, and Student Attentiveness at the Junior High and Senior High Levels. , 1980 .

[12]  J. F. Andersen,et al.  The impact of lecturer nonverbal expressiveness on improving mediated instruction , 1981 .

[13]  Jon F. Nussbaum,et al.  Three investigations exploring relationships between perceived teacher communication behaviors and student learning , 1981 .

[14]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitude and Attitude Change , 1981 .

[15]  R. Rosenthal.  Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .

[16]  P. Kearney,et al.  Teacher immediacy for affective learning in divergent college classes , 1985 .

[17]  Brian J. Furio.  The relationship between instructor behaviors and student perceptions of control in the classroom , 1986 .

[18]  Patricia Kearney,et al.  Effects of Teacher Immediacy and Strategy Type on College Student Resistance. , 1986 .

[19]  Virginia P. Richmond,et al.  Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning , 1986 .

[20]  H. Giles,et al.  Speech Accommodation Theory: The First Decade and Beyond , 1987 .

[21]  Virginia P. Richmond,et al.  Power in the classroom VII: Linking behavior alteration techniques to cognitive learning , 1987 .

[22]  Virginia P. Richmond,et al.  The Relationship Between Selected Immediacy Behaviors and Cognitive Learning , 1987 .

[23]  Jerry L. Allen.  The Effects of Communication Avoidance, Learning Styles, and Gender upon Classroom Achievement. , 1987 .

[24]  J. Gorham,et al.  Effects of immediacy on recall of information , 1988 .

[25]  J. Gorham.  The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning , 1988 .

[26]  William B. Gudykunst,et al.  Culture and interpersonal communication , 1988 .

[27]  G. Sorensen.  The relationships among teachers' self‐disglosive statements, students' perceptions, and affective learning , 1989 .

[28]  R. Wiseman,et al.  The effects of verbal and nonverbal teacher immediacy on perceived cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning in the multicultural classroom , 1990 .

[29]  Michael Z. Hackman,et al.  Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction , 1990 .

[30]  J. Gorham,et al.  A comparison of teacher and student perceptions of immediacy and learning: Monitoring process and product , 1990 .

[31]  Diane M. Christophel,et al.  The Relationship of Teachers' Use of Humor in the Classroom to Immediacy and Student Learning. , 1990 .

[32]  Jerry L. Allen,et al.  Teachers' communication behaviors and supervisors' evaluation of instruction in elementary and secondary classrooms , 1990 .

[33]  An Investigation of Verbal and Nonverbal Teacher Immediacy Behaviors, Homophily, Interpersonal Solidarity, Student Attentiveness and Student Learning at the Senior High School Level. , 1990 .

[34]  V. Richmond.  Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation , 1990 .

[35]  Diane M. Christophel.  The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning , 1990 .

[36]  Robert G. Powell,et al.  The effects of teacher immediacy and clarity on instructional outcomes: An intercultural assessment , 1990 .

[37]  Michael Z. Hackman,et al.  INFCRMATION TRANSFER AND NONVERBAL IMMEDIACY AS PRIMARY PREDICTORS OF LEARNING AND SATISFACTION IN THE TELEVISED COURSE , 2007 .

[38]  Ron Sept.  Culture and Interpersonal Communication , 1991 .

[39]  S. Beebe,et al.  A Study of the Application of Implicit Communication Theory to Teacher Immediacy and Student Learning. , 1992 .

[40]  S. Booth-Butterfield,et al.  Teacher immediacy and student involvement: A dual process analysis , 1992 .

[41]  Sue Dewine,et al.  The Development of a Communication-Based Model of Teacher Efficacy. , 1993 .

[42]  Ann Bainbridge Frymier.  The impact of teacher immediacy on students' motivation: Is it the same for all students? , 1993 .

[43]  Ann Bainbridge Frymier.  A model of immediacy in the classroom , 1994 .

[44]  C. Orpen.  Academic Motivation as a Moderator of the Effects of Teacher Immediacy on Student Cognitive and Affective Learning , 1994 .

[45]  Diane M. Christophel,et al.  A test‐retest analysis of student motivation, teacher immediacy, and perceived sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes , 1995 .

[46]  J. Comstock,et al.  Food for thought: Teacher nonverbal immediacy, student learning, and curvilinearity , 1995 .

[47]  A comparison of teacher immediacy in African‐American and Euro‐American college classrooms , 1995 .

[48]  Virginia P. Richmond,et al.  Validity of the verbal immediacy scale , 1995 .

[49]  Rena Y. Robinson.  Affiliative Communication Behaviors: A Comparative Analysis of the Interrelationships among Teacher Nonverbal Immediacy, Responsiveness, and Verbal Receptivity on the Prediction of Student Learning. , 1995 .

[50]  Diane M. Christophel,et al.  College teacher immediacy and student ratings of instruction , 1996 .

[51]  Joan M. Fayer,et al.  A multi‐cultural examination of the relationship between nonverbal immediacy and affective learning , 1996 .

[52]  Joan M. Fayer,et al.  Nonverbal immediacy and cognitive learning: A cross‐cultural investigation , 1996 .

[53]  Walter R. Borg,et al.  Educational research: An introduction, 6th ed. , 1996 .

[54]  Patricia Kearney,et al.  Clarifying the relationship between teacher nonverbal immediacy and student cognitive learning: Affective learning as the central causal mediator , 1996 .

[55]  James C. McCroskey,et al.  Communication correlates of teacher clarity in the college classroom , 1997 .

[56]  Stanley H. Cohen,et al.  Fashion in the Classroom II: Instructor Immediacy and Attire. , 1997 .

[57]  J. Neuliep.  A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Teacher Immediacy in American and Japanese College Classrooms , 1997 .

[58]  Paul L. Witt.  A Study of the Relationships among Student Expectations about Teacher Nonverbal Immediacy, Student Perceptions of Teacher Nonverbal Immediacy, and Affective Learning in Distance Learning and the On-Site Classroom , 1997 .

[59]  Laura J. Christensen,et al.  The Linear Relationship between Student Reports of Teacher Immediacy Behaviors and Perceptions of State Motivation, and of Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Learning. , 1998 .

[60]  L. L. Hinkle.  Teacher nonverbal immediacy behaviors and student‐perceived cognitive learning in Japan , 1998 .

[61]  Marian L. Houser,et al.  Does Making Content Relevant Make a Difference in Learning , 1998 .

[62]  S. Myers,et al.  Instructor immediacy in the Chinese college classroom , 1998 .

[63]  The differences in students' perceptions of learning between Extended Learning Program students and on-campus students at Southern Christian University , 1998 .

[64]  A Study of the Relationships among Teachers' Immediacy of Dress Factors and Affective Learning Factors: a Relational Communication Perspective , 1998 .

[65]  Tracy L. Morris,et al.  Fashion in the classroom III: Effects of instructor attire and immediacy in natural classroom interactions , 1999 .

[66]  K. Menzel,et al.  The impact of gender and immediacy on willingness to talk and perceived learning , 1999 .

[67]  M. Wanzer,et al.  The relationship between student perceptions of instructor humor and students’ reports of learning , 1999 .

[68]  Marian L. Houser,et al.  The teacher‐student relationship as an interpersonal relationship , 2000 .

[69]  Joseph L. Chesebro,et al.  The relationship between students' reports of learning and their actual recall of lecture material: A validity test , 2000 .

[70]  Jason D. Baker,et al.  The effects of instructor immediacy and student cohesiveness on affective and cognitive learning in the online classroom , 2001 .

[71]  Jon A. Hess,et al.  Is teacher immediacy actually related to student cognitive learning? , 2001 .

[72]  R. Reynolds,et al.  Computer-mediated immediacy: a new construct in teacher-student communication for computer-mediated distance education , 2001 .

[73]  James C. McCroskey,et al.  The relationship of teacher clarity and immediacy with student state receiver apprehension, affect, and cognitive learning , 2001 .

[74]  B. Titsworth,et al.  The effects of teacher immediacy, use of organizational lecture cues, and students’ notetaking on cognitive learning , 2001 .

[75]  Lawrence R. Wheeless,et al.  An experimental study of teachers’ verbal and nonverbal immediacy and students’ affective and cognitive learning , 2001 .

[76]  K. Roach,et al.  A cross‐cultural comparison of instructor communication in American and German classrooms , 2001 .

[77]  Susan J. Messman,et al.  Effects of communication environment, immediacy, and communication apprehension on cognitive and affective learning , 2001 .

[78]  Timothy P. Mottet,et al.  Relationships between teacher nonverbal immediacy, student emotional response, and perceived student learning , 2002 .