Regional variation in cardiac catheterization appropriateness and baseline risk after acute myocardial infarction.

[1]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Certificate of Need Regulation and Cardiac Catheterization Appropriateness After Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2007, Circulation.

[2]  J. Tu,et al.  Regional Differences in Process of Care and Outcomes for Older Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients in the United States and Ontario, Canada , 2006, Circulation.

[3]  F. Van de Werf,et al.  Intervention in acute coronary syndromes: do patients undergo intervention on the basis of their risk characteristics? The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) , 2005, Heart.

[4]  J. Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). , 2006, Circulation.

[5]  Joseph P Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[6]  J. Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention—summary article: A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines(ACC/AHA/SCAI writing committee to update the 2001 guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention) , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  J V Tu,et al.  Validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) acute coronary syndrome prediction model for six month post-discharge death in an independent data set , 2005, Heart.

[8]  A. Laupacis,et al.  Risk-treatment mismatch in the pharmacotherapy of heart failure. , 2005, JAMA.

[9]  D. Wennberg,et al.  Long-term outcomes of regional variations in intensity of invasive vs medical management of Medicare Patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2005, JAMA.

[10]  Á. Avezum,et al.  Access to catheterisation facilities in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome: multinational registry study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Utilization of early invasive management strategies for high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from the CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative. , 2005, JAMA.

[12]  A. Lucassen,et al.  Family history of breast cancer , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Utilization of Early Invasive Management Strategies for High-Risk Patients With Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: Results From the CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative , 2004 .

[14]  Lippincott Williams Wilkins,et al.  ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction , 2004 .

[15]  G. Lamas,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients wi , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  A. Laupacis,et al.  Age, risk-benefit trade-offs, and the projected effects of evidence-based therapies. , 2004, The American journal of medicine.

[17]  M. Mamdani,et al.  Lipid-lowering therapy with statins in high-risk elderly patients: the treatment-risk paradox. , 2004, JAMA.

[18]  A. Laupacis,et al.  Age, risk-benefit trade-offs, and the projected effects of evidence-based therapies , 2004 .

[19]  Á. Avezum,et al.  Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. , 2003, Archives of internal medicine.

[20]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  National and state trends in quality of care for acute myocardial infarction between 1994-1995 and 1998-1999: the medicare health care quality improvement program. , 2003, Archives of internal medicine.

[21]  P. Austin,et al.  Waiting times, revascularization modality, and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction at hospitals with and without on-site revascularization facilities in Canada. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Regional variation in the treatment and outcomes of myocardial infarction: investigating New England's advantage. , 2003, American heart journal.

[23]  H. Krumholz,et al.  National and State Trends in Quality of Care for Acute Myocardial Infarction Between 1994-1995 and 1998-1999 , 2003 .

[24]  L. Leape,et al.  Regionalization and the underuse of angiography in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System as compared with a fee-for-service system. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  J. W. Schaeffer,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction—summary article , 2002 .

[26]  Carl J Pepine,et al.  ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--2002: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients , 2002, Circulation.

[27]  Carl J Pepine,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Sex Differences in Cardiac Catheterization after Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Role of Procedure Appropriateness , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[29]  C. Vassanelli,et al.  [Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban]. , 2001, Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology.

[30]  B. McNeil,et al.  Appropriateness of coronary angiography after myocardial infarction among Medicare beneficiaries. Managed care versus fee for service. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  H. S,et al.  Early Revascularization in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock , 2000 .

[32]  F. Ragmin.  Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study , 1999, The Lancet.

[33]  H. White,et al.  Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  R. Califf,et al.  1999 update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[35]  L. Wallentin,et al.  Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study , 1999 .

[36]  J. Zhang,et al.  What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. , 1998, JAMA.

[37]  B. McNeil,et al.  Use of cardiac procedures and outcomes in elderly patients with myocardial infarction in the United States and Canada. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  B. McNeil,et al.  Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Ontario and New York State: Which Rate Is Right? , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[39]  Richard P. Lewis,et al.  ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1996 .

[40]  Richard P. Lewis,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[41]  David P Miller,et al.  Determinants of the use of coronary angiography and revascularization after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[42]  B. McNeil,et al.  Variation in the use of cardiac procedures after acute myocardial infarction. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  L. Leape,et al.  Comparison of the appropriateness of coronary angiography and coronary artery bypass graft surgery between Canada and New York State. , 1994, JAMA.