Visual versus quantitative analysis of coronary artery stenoses treated by coronary angioplasty: can the angiographer’s eye be re-educated?

[1]  C. Bauters,et al.  Restenosis after coronary angioplasty. , 1995, European heart journal.

[2]  G. Mancini,et al.  Quantitative coronary angiography , 1994 .

[3]  S E Nissen,et al.  Influence of operator- and patient-dependent variables on the suitability of automated quantitative coronary arteriography for routine clinical use. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  P. Serruys,et al.  Lumen narrowing after percutaneous transluminal coronary balloon angioplasty follows a near gaussian distribution: a quantitative angiographic study in 1,445 successfully dilated lesions. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  G. Mancini,et al.  Effect of coronary stenosis severity on variability of quantitative arteriography, and implications for interventional trials. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  P. Serruys,et al.  Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: the paradox of increased lumen diameter and restenosis. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  K. Gould,et al.  Patterns in visual interpretation of coronary arteriograms as detected by quantitative coronary arteriography. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  P. Serruys,et al.  Prevention of Restenosis After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty With Thromboxane A2‐Receptor Blockade: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Trial , 1991, Circulation.

[9]  R. Califf,et al.  Clinical trials of restenosis after coronary angioplasty. , 1991, Circulation.

[10]  P J de Feyter,et al.  Quantitative coronary angiography to measure progression and regression of coronary atherosclerosis. Value, limitations, and implications for clinical trials. , 1991, Circulation.

[11]  Melvin L. Marcus,et al.  Cardiac Imaging: A Companion to Braunwald's Heart Disease , 1991 .

[12]  M. Stadius,et al.  Coronary artery revascularization. Critical need for, and consequences of, objective angiographic assessment of lesion severity. , 1990, Circulation.

[13]  R. Vogel,et al.  Accuracy of individual and panel visual interpretations of coronary arteriograms: implications for clinical decisions. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  P. Serruys,et al.  Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: new standards for clinical studies. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  N. Kleiman,et al.  Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography to visual estimates of lesion severity pre and post PTCA. , 1990, American heart journal.

[16]  C. J. Kooijman,et al.  How critical is frame selection in quantitative coronary angiographic studies? , 1989, European heart journal.

[17]  P J de Feyter,et al.  Change in diameter of coronary artery segments adjacent to stenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: failure of percent diameter stenosis measurement to reflect morphologic changes induced by balloon dilation. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  K. Gould,et al.  Identifying and Measuring Severity of Coronary Artery Stenosis: Quantitative Coronary Arteriography and Positron Emission Tomography , 1988, Circulation.

[19]  A Crowther,et al.  Assessment of coronary angioplasty: comparison of visual assessment, hand-held caliper measurement and automated digital quantitation. , 1988, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[20]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[21]  J. Forrester,et al.  Digital quantification eliminates intraobserver and interobserver variability in the evaluation of coronary artery stenosis. , 1985, The American journal of cardiology.

[22]  J. J. Gerbrands,et al.  Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. , 1985, Circulation.

[23]  H J ten Katen,et al.  Assessment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by quantitative coronary angiography: diameter versus densitometric area measurements. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  C. White,et al.  Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  E L Bolson,et al.  A new digital electronic caliper for measurement of coronary arterial stenosis: comparison with visual estimates and computer-assisted measurements. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[26]  J. Murray,et al.  Variability in the Analysis of Coronary Arteriograms , 1977, Circulation.

[27]  G W Hamilton,et al.  Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis. Instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. , 1974, The American journal of cardiology.