Visual versus quantitative analysis of coronary artery stenoses treated by coronary angioplasty: can the angiographer’s eye be re-educated?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] C. Bauters,et al. Restenosis after coronary angioplasty. , 1995, European heart journal.
[2] G. Mancini,et al. Quantitative coronary angiography , 1994 .
[3] S E Nissen,et al. Influence of operator- and patient-dependent variables on the suitability of automated quantitative coronary arteriography for routine clinical use. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[4] P. Serruys,et al. Lumen narrowing after percutaneous transluminal coronary balloon angioplasty follows a near gaussian distribution: a quantitative angiographic study in 1,445 successfully dilated lesions. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[5] G. Mancini,et al. Effect of coronary stenosis severity on variability of quantitative arteriography, and implications for interventional trials. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.
[6] P. Serruys,et al. Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: the paradox of increased lumen diameter and restenosis. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[7] K. Gould,et al. Patterns in visual interpretation of coronary arteriograms as detected by quantitative coronary arteriography. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[8] P. Serruys,et al. Prevention of Restenosis After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty With Thromboxane A2‐Receptor Blockade: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Trial , 1991, Circulation.
[9] R. Califf,et al. Clinical trials of restenosis after coronary angioplasty. , 1991, Circulation.
[10] P J de Feyter,et al. Quantitative coronary angiography to measure progression and regression of coronary atherosclerosis. Value, limitations, and implications for clinical trials. , 1991, Circulation.
[11] Melvin L. Marcus,et al. Cardiac Imaging: A Companion to Braunwald's Heart Disease , 1991 .
[12] M. Stadius,et al. Coronary artery revascularization. Critical need for, and consequences of, objective angiographic assessment of lesion severity. , 1990, Circulation.
[13] R. Vogel,et al. Accuracy of individual and panel visual interpretations of coronary arteriograms: implications for clinical decisions. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[14] P. Serruys,et al. Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: new standards for clinical studies. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[15] N. Kleiman,et al. Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography to visual estimates of lesion severity pre and post PTCA. , 1990, American heart journal.
[16] C. J. Kooijman,et al. How critical is frame selection in quantitative coronary angiographic studies? , 1989, European heart journal.
[17] P J de Feyter,et al. Change in diameter of coronary artery segments adjacent to stenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: failure of percent diameter stenosis measurement to reflect morphologic changes induced by balloon dilation. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[18] K. Gould,et al. Identifying and Measuring Severity of Coronary Artery Stenosis: Quantitative Coronary Arteriography and Positron Emission Tomography , 1988, Circulation.
[19] A Crowther,et al. Assessment of coronary angioplasty: comparison of visual assessment, hand-held caliper measurement and automated digital quantitation. , 1988, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.
[20] D. Altman,et al. STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.
[21] J. Forrester,et al. Digital quantification eliminates intraobserver and interobserver variability in the evaluation of coronary artery stenosis. , 1985, The American journal of cardiology.
[22] J. J. Gerbrands,et al. Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. , 1985, Circulation.
[23] H J ten Katen,et al. Assessment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by quantitative coronary angiography: diameter versus densitometric area measurements. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.
[24] C. White,et al. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.
[25] E L Bolson,et al. A new digital electronic caliper for measurement of coronary arterial stenosis: comparison with visual estimates and computer-assisted measurements. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.
[26] J. Murray,et al. Variability in the Analysis of Coronary Arteriograms , 1977, Circulation.
[27] G W Hamilton,et al. Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis. Instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. , 1974, The American journal of cardiology.