Malignant lesion segmentation in contrast-enhanced breast MR images based on the marker-controlled watershed.

Breast tumor volume measured on MRI has been used to assess response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, accurate and reproducible delineation of breast lesions can be challenging, since the lesions may have complicated topological structures and heterogeneous intensity distributions. In this article, the authors present an advanced computerized method to semiautomatically segment tumor volumes on T1-weighted, contrast-enhanced breast MRI. The method starts with manual selection of a region of interest (ROI) that contains the lesion to be segmented in a single image, followed by automated separation of the lesion volume from its surrounding breast parenchyma by using a unique combination of the image processing techniques including Gaussian mixture modeling and a marker-controlled watershed transform. Explicitly, the Gaussian mixture modeling is applied to an intensity histogram of the pixels inside the ROI to distinguish the tumor class from other tissues. Based on the ROI and the intensity distribution of the tumor, internal and external markers are determined and the tumor contour is delineated using the marker-controlled watershed transform. To obtain the tumor volume, the segmented tumor in one slice is propagated to the adjacent slice to form an ROI in that slice. The marker-controlled watershed segmentation is then used again to obtain a tumor contour in the propagated slice. This procedure is terminated when there is no lesion in an adjacent slice. To reduce measurement variations possibly caused by the manual selection of the ROI, the segmentation result is refined based on an automatically determined ROI based on the segmented volume. The algorithm was applied to 13 patients with breast cancer, prospectively accrued prior to beginning neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Each patient had two MRI scans, a baseline MRI examination prior to commencing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and a 1 week follow-up after receiving the first dose of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Blinded to the computer segmentation results, two experienced radiologists manually delineated all tumors independently. The computer results were then compared with the manually generated results using the volume overlap ratio, defined as the intersection of the computer- and radiologist-generated tumor volumes divided by the union of the two. The algorithm reached overall overlap ratios of 62.6% +/- 9.1% and 61.0% +/- 11.3% in comparison to the two manual segmentation results, respectively. The overall overlap ratio between the two radiologists' manual segmentations was 64.3% +/- 10.4%. Preliminary results suggest that the proposed algorithm is a promising method for assisting in tumor volume measurement in contrast-enhanced breast MRI.

[1]  D R Haynor,et al.  Partial volume tissue classification of multichannel magnetic resonance images-a mixel model. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[2]  Luc Vincent,et al.  Watersheds in Digital Spaces: An Efficient Algorithm Based on Immersion Simulations , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  R. Jaszczak,et al.  Parameter estimation of finite mixtures using the EM algorithm and information criteria with application to medical image processing , 1992 .

[4]  Luc Vincent,et al.  Morphological grayscale reconstruction in image analysis: applications and efficient algorithms , 1993, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[5]  A. Stavros,et al.  Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. , 1995, Radiology.

[6]  J O Barentsz,et al.  Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. , 1995, Radiology.

[7]  Laurent Najman,et al.  Geodesic Saliency of Watershed Contours and Hierarchical Segmentation , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  J J Vaquero,et al.  Applying watershed algorithms to the segmentation of clustered nuclei. , 1998, Cytometry.

[9]  J Sijbers,et al.  Watershed-based segmentation of 3D MR data for volume quantization. , 1997, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[10]  Moncef Gabbouj,et al.  Parallel Image Component Labeling With Watershed Transformation , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  Thomas J. Hebert,et al.  Bayesian pixel classification using spatially variant finite mixtures and the generalized EM algorithm , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[12]  Aggelos K. Katsaggelos,et al.  Hybrid image segmentation using watersheds and fast region merging , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[13]  L. Esserman,et al.  Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  L. Joshua Leon,et al.  Watershed-Based Segmentation and Region Merging , 2000, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[15]  S. Wurdinger,et al.  Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography , 2000, Breast Cancer Research.

[16]  Jos B. T. M. Roerdink,et al.  The Watershed Transform: Definitions, Algorithms and Parallelization Strategies , 2000, Fundam. Informaticae.

[17]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[18]  M. Giger,et al.  Automatic segmentation of breast lesions on ultrasound. , 2001, Medical physics.

[19]  Ying Lu,et al.  Accuracy of MR imaging for revealing residual breast cancer in patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  Marcel Worring,et al.  Watersnakes: Energy-Driven Watershed Segmentation , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[21]  Badrinath Roysam,et al.  A hybrid 3D watershed algorithm incorporating gradient cues and object models for automatic segmentation of nuclei in confocal image stacks , 2003, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[22]  M. Dewhirst,et al.  Accuracy of MRI in the detection of residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Combining low-, high-level and empirical domain knowledge for automated segmentation of ultrasonic breast lesions , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Segmentation of breast tumors in mammograms using fuzzy sets , 2003, J. Electronic Imaging.

[25]  Joseph M. Reinhardt,et al.  Classification of breast MRI lesions using a backpropagation neural network (BNN) , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[26]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Improved watershed transform for medical image segmentation using prior information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  Rebecca S Lewis,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. , 2004, Radiology.

[28]  C. Balu-Maestro,et al.  Imaging in Evaluation of Response to Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment Benefits of MRI , 2002, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[29]  L. Esserman,et al.  MRI measurements of breast tumor volume predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence-free survival. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[30]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital Versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  Binsheng Zhao,et al.  Marker-controlled watershed for lymphoma segmentation in sequential CT images. , 2006, Medical physics.

[32]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  A Fuzzy C-Means (FCM)-Based Approach for Computerized Segmentation of Breast Lesions in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Images1 , 2006 .

[33]  Donald S. Fussell,et al.  Interactive lesion segmentation on dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI using a Markov model , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[34]  Deepa Narayanan,et al.  High‐Resolution Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography with Compression (“Positron Emission Mammography”) is Highly Accurate in Depicting Primary Breast Cancer , 2006, The breast journal.

[35]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Level Set Contouring for Breast Tumor in Sonography , 2007, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[36]  Tahsin Kurc,et al.  Malignant‐lesion segmentation using 4D co‐occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[37]  B. C. Penney,et al.  A Gaussian mixture model for definition of lung tumor volumes in positron emission tomography. , 2007, Medical physics.

[38]  Kenji Suzuki,et al.  A dual-stage method for lesion segmentation on digital mammograms. , 2007, Medical physics.

[39]  E. Morris Diagnostic breast MR imaging: current status and future directions. , 2007, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[40]  Robert A Smith,et al.  Cancer Screening in the United States, 2007: A Review of Current Guidelines, Practices, and Prospects , 2007, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[41]  Alfonso Rojas Domínguez,et al.  Improved dynamic-programming-based algorithms for segmentation of masses in mammograms. , 2007, Medical physics.

[42]  P. Fumoleau,et al.  [18F]FDG-PET predicts complete pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[43]  M. Yaffe,et al.  American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography , 2007 .

[44]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2008 , 2008, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[45]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Breast mass segmentation on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance scans using the level set method , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.