Modeling probabilities of patent oppositions in a Bayesian semiparametric regression framework

Previous econometric analyses of patent data rely on regression methods using purely parametric forms of the predictor for modeling the dependence of the response. These approaches lack the capability of identifying potential non-linear relationships between dependent and independent variables. In this paper, we present a Bayesian semiparametric approach making use of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation techniques which is able to capture these non-linearities. Using this methodology we reanalyze the determinants of patent oppositions in Europe for biotechnology/pharmaceutical and semiconductor/computer software patents. Our semiparametric specification clearly finds considerable non-linearities in the effect of various metrical covariates which has been not been discussed previously. Further, a formal model validation based on ROC-methodology which splits the data in a training and a validation data set shows a significant improvement of the explanatory and the predictive power of our approach compared to purely parametric specifications.

[1]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  Applications, grants and the value of patent , 2000 .

[2]  Romuald Singer,et al.  European patent convention , 1995 .

[3]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Characteristics of patent litigation: a window on competition , 2001 .

[4]  Bruno Van Pottelsberghe,et al.  Applications grants and the value of patents , 2000 .

[5]  L. Fahrmeir,et al.  Multivariate statistical modelling based on generalized linear models , 1994 .

[6]  J. Besag,et al.  Bayesian Computation and Stochastic Systems , 1995 .

[7]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Determinants of Opposition against EPO Patent Grants – The Case of Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals ∗ , 2002 .

[8]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[9]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Post-Issue Patent "Quality Control": A Comparative Study of Us Patent Re-Examinations and European Patent Oppositions , 2002 .

[10]  Patent Manuel,et al.  USING PATENT DATA AS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INDICATORS , 1994 .

[11]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Multivariate Statistical Modelling Based on Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.

[12]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[13]  S. Scotchmer,et al.  Innovation and Incentives , 2004 .

[14]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Modelling the Duration of Patent Examination at the European Patent Office , 2005 .

[15]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights: A Survey of the Empirical Literature , 1997 .

[16]  Deepak Somaya Strategic determinants of decisions not to settle patent litigation , 2003 .

[17]  Jean O. Lanjouw,et al.  How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data , 1996 .

[18]  L. Fahrmeir,et al.  Bayesian Semiparametric Regression Analysis of Multicategorical Time-Space Data , 2001 .

[19]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  The Quality of Ideas: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators , 1999 .

[20]  Kerrie Mengersen,et al.  [Bayesian Computation and Stochastic Systems]: Rejoinder , 1995 .

[21]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[22]  Robert P. Merges,et al.  As Many as Six Impossible Patents Before Breakfast: Property Rights for Business Concepts and Patent System Reform , 1999 .

[23]  D. H. Besterfield Quality control , 1979 .

[24]  Peter Green,et al.  Markov chain Monte Carlo in Practice , 1996 .

[25]  Scott Stern,et al.  Are All Patent Examiners Equal? The Impact of Examiner Characteristics , 2002 .

[26]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights Have Profited from Comments and Suggestions , 2002 .

[27]  E. Kaufer,et al.  The Economics of the Patent System , 2002 .

[28]  Paul H. C. Eilers,et al.  Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties , 1996 .

[29]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Post-Issue Patent , 2002 .

[30]  Andreas Brezger,et al.  Generalized structured additive regression based on Bayesian P-splines , 2006, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[31]  Thomas C. Melvin,et al.  European Patent Office , 2002 .

[32]  L. Fahrmeir,et al.  Geoadditive Survival Models , 2006 .

[33]  M. Zweig,et al.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[34]  L. Fahrmeir,et al.  Bayesian inference for generalized additive mixed models based on Markov random field priors , 2001 .

[35]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[36]  Peter Green,et al.  A primer in Markov Chain Monte Carlo , 2001 .

[37]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[38]  Mark Schankerman,et al.  Protecting Intellectual Property Rights: Are Small Firms Handicapped?* , 2004, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[39]  D. Cox,et al.  Complex stochastic systems , 2000 .