Data representation and reduction for chromatin texture in nuclei from premalignant prostatic, esophageal, and colonic lesions.

BACKGROUND To identify nuclei and lesions with great specificity, a large set of karyometric features is arranged in the form of a linear profile, called a nuclear signature. The karyometric feature values are normalized as z-values. Their ordering along the profile axis is arbitrary but consistent. The profile of the nuclear signature is distinctive; it can be characterized by a new set of variables called contour features. A number of data reduction methods are introduced and their performance is compared with that of the karyometric features in the classification of prostatic, colonic, and esophageal lesions. METHODS Contour characteristics were reduced to descriptive statistics of the set of z-values in the nuclear signature and to sequence information. The contour features derived were (1) relative frequencies of occurrence of z-values and of their differences and (2) co-occurrence statistics, run lengths of z-values, and statistics of higher-order dependencies. Performance was evaluated by comparing classification scores of diagnostic groups. RESULTS Rates for correct classification by karyometric features alone and contour features alone indicate equivalent performance. Classification by a combined set of features led to an increase in correct classification. CONCLUSIONS Image analysis and subsequent data reduction of nuclear signatures of contour features is a novel method, providing quantitative information that may lead to an effective identification of nuclei and lesions.

[1]  Mary M. Galloway,et al.  Texture analysis using gray level run lengths , 1974 .

[2]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[3]  P H Bartels,et al.  Chromatin texture in high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and early invasive carcinoma. , 1999, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[4]  G. Mariuzzi,et al.  Quantitative study of ductal breast cancer progression. A progression index (P.I.) for premalignant lesions and in situ carcinoma. , 1996, Pathology, research and practice.

[5]  P H Bartels,et al.  Distinguishing cortical adrenal gland adenomas from carcinomas by their quantitative nuclear features. , 1999, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[6]  P H Bartels,et al.  Karyometric features in nuclei near colonic adenocarcinoma. Statistical analysis. , 1991, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[7]  P H Bartels,et al.  Nuclear chromatin texture in prostatic lesions. I. PIN and adenocarcinoma. , 1998, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[8]  P H Bartels,et al.  Chromatin texture signatures in nuclei from prostate lesions. , 1998, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[9]  P H Bartels,et al.  Nuclear chromatin texture in prostatic lesions. II. PIN and malignancy associated changes. , 1998, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[10]  B Palcic,et al.  Nuclear texture: can it be used as a surrogate endpoint biomarker? , 1994, Journal of cellular biochemistry. Supplement.

[11]  P H Bartels,et al.  Nuclear morphometry in solar keratosis. , 1998, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[12]  W. Kruskal,et al.  Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis , 1952 .

[13]  B H Mayall,et al.  Characterization of chromatin distribution in cell nuclei. , 1986, Cytometry.