Three in-course assessment reforms to improve higher education learning outcomes

A current international concern is that, for too large a proportion of graduates, their higher order cognitive and practical capabilities are below acceptable levels. The constituent courses of academic programmes are the most logical sites for developing these capabilities. Contributing to patchy attainment are deficiencies in three particular aspects of assessment practice: the design and specifications of many assessment tasks; the minimum requirements for awarding a passing grade in a course and granting credit towards the degree; and the accumulation of points derived from quizzes, assessments or activities completed during the teaching period. Rethinking and reforming these would lead to improvements for significant sub-populations of students. Pursuing such a goal would also have significant positive implications for academic teachers, but be contingent on favourable contextual settings including departmental and institutional priorities.

[1]  Anna Jones There is nothing generic about graduate attributes: unpacking the scope of context , 2013 .

[2]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  New developments in goal setting and task performance. , 2013 .

[3]  Henry L. Tosi A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[4]  D. Sadler Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal , 2010 .

[5]  M. Seligman,et al.  Navigating Into the Future or Driven by the Past , 2013, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[6]  A. Abraham,et al.  Social moderation, assessment and assuring standards for accounting graduates , 2014 .

[7]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Has Goal Setting Gone Wild, or Have Its Attackers Abandoned Good Scholarship? , 2009 .

[8]  D. Nicol,et al.  Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice , 2006 .

[9]  D. Royce Sadler,et al.  Academic freedom, achievement standards and professional identity , 2011 .

[10]  Frances K. Stage,et al.  Measuring College Learning Responsibly: Accountability in a New Era (review) , 2012 .

[11]  Anna Jones,et al.  Redisciplining generic attributes: the disciplinary context in focus , 2009 .

[12]  H. Pashler,et al.  Recent Research on Human Learning Challenges Conventional Instructional Strategies , 2010 .

[13]  S. Page,et al.  Student perception of academic grading: Personality, academic orientation, and effort , 2012 .

[14]  D. Sadler Opening up feedback: teaching learners to see , 2013 .

[15]  D. Murphey,et al.  Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses , 2011 .

[16]  J. Williams,et al.  The place of the closed book, invigilated final examination in a knowledge economy , 2005 .

[17]  J. Biggs,et al.  Teaching For Quality Learning At University , 1999 .

[18]  Victoria Watkins Modeling and Measuring Competencies in Higher Education: Tasks and Challenges , 2016 .

[19]  Hermann Ebbinghaus (1885) Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology , 2013, Annals of Neurosciences.

[20]  Gareth Williams Subject Benchmarking in the UK , 2010 .

[21]  D. Dill,et al.  Public Policy for Academic Quality , 2010 .

[22]  N. Sommers Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers , 1980, College Composition & Communication.

[23]  Karine Tremblay,et al.  OECD Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO) , 2013 .

[24]  D. Royce Sadler,et al.  Assessment in Education : Principles , Policy & Practice , 2012 .

[25]  M. Jahoda,et al.  Assumptions underlying the use of university examinations , 1967 .

[26]  Janice Fiamengo The Fail-Proof Student , 2013 .

[27]  Rosario Hernández,et al.  Does continuous assessment in higher education support student learning? , 2012 .

[28]  D. Sadler Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems , 1989 .

[29]  Theodore R. Schatzki,et al.  Practice mind-ed orders , 2005 .

[30]  H. Coates Higher Education Learning Outcomes Assessment , 2015 .

[31]  Mona Hicks,et al.  Our Underachieving Colleges: A Candid Look at How Much Students Learn and Why They Should Be Learning More , 2006 .

[32]  Chris J. Park,et al.  In Other (People's) Words: Plagiarism by university students--literature and lessons , 2003 .

[33]  D. Sadler The futility of attempting to codify academic achievement standards , 2014 .

[34]  Sigrid Blömeke,et al.  Modeling and Measuring Competencies in Higher Education , 2013 .

[35]  F. Strydom Higher education learning outcomes assessment: international perspectives , 2017 .

[36]  Sven Isaksson Assess as you go: the effect of continuous assessment on student learning during a short course in archaeology , 2008 .

[37]  Jeff Zorn English Compositionism as Fraud and Failure , 2013 .

[38]  M. Strathern ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system , 1997, European Review.

[39]  J. Edwards,et al.  Anxiety, coping and academic performance , 1992 .

[40]  Kristin A. Duncan Grade Inflation: A Crisis in College Education , 2004 .

[41]  Sjur Bergan,et al.  Higher education for modern societies : competences and values , 2010 .

[42]  E. Pacherie The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework , 2008, Cognition.

[43]  M. Hookey Book Review: Wells, Gordon. (Ed.). (2001). Action, talk, and text: learning and teaching through inquiry. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University. , 2003 .

[44]  Martin A. Conway,et al.  Very long‐term memory for knowledge acquired at school and university , 1992 .

[45]  S. Brookhart Grading Practices and Validity , 1991 .

[46]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. , 1981 .

[47]  Ronald N. Taylor NATURE OF PROBLEM ILL-STRUCTUREDNESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR PROBLEM FORMULATION AND SOLUTION , 1974 .

[48]  Wales,et al.  Innovations in language testing : proceedings of the IUS/NFER Conference, April, 1985 , 1986 .

[49]  D. Dill,et al.  Designing the framework conditions for assuring academic standards: lessons learned about professional, market, and government regulation of academic quality , 2013 .

[50]  J. Emig Writing as a Mode of Learning. , 1977 .

[51]  C. Frith,et al.  Action, agency and responsibility , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[52]  Chun-Mei Zhao,et al.  The learning outcomes race: the value of self-reported gains in large research universities , 2012 .

[53]  Judith Grunert The Course Syllabus: A Learning-Centered Approach , 1997 .

[54]  Robert Weissberg Critically Thinking about Critical Thinking , 2013 .

[55]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Frameworks for understanding as experienced in essay writing and in preparing for examination , 1995 .

[56]  D. Royce,et al.  Sadler, D. R. (2013) 'Opening up feedback: Teaching learners to see'. In Merry, S., Price, M., Carless, D., & Taras, M. (Eds.) Reconceptualising Feedback in Higher Education: developing dialogue with students. (Ch. 5, 54-63). , 2013 .

[57]  Eileen Trotter Student perceptions of continuous summative assessment , 2006 .

[58]  A. P. Craig,et al.  Time and Learning , 2000, On Learning.

[59]  Richard J. Shavelson,et al.  On an Approach to Testing and Modeling Competence , 2013 .

[60]  Learning from assessment events: the role of goal knowledge , 2014 .

[61]  Robb Lindgren,et al.  Transforming Online Learning through Narrative and Student Agency , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[62]  Lewis Elton A Challenge to Established Assessment Practice , 2004 .

[63]  John Walker,et al.  Measuring plagiarism: researching what students do, not what they say they do , 2010 .

[64]  John B. Biggs,et al.  Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does , 1999 .

[65]  M. S. Sternglass Time To Know Them: A Longitudinal Study of Writing and Learning at the College Level , 1997 .

[66]  D. Royce Sadler,et al.  Grade integrity and the representation of academic achievement , 2009 .

[67]  N. Roese Counterfactual thinking. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[68]  K. Duncker On Pleasure, Emotion, and Striving , 1941 .

[69]  Jeremy B. Williams,et al.  The efficacy of final examinations: A comparative study of closed-book, invigilated exams and open-book, open-web exams , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[70]  Mark Barrow,et al.  Book Review: The Course Syllabus: A Learning-centred Approach (2nd Ed.) by Judith Grunert O’Brien, Barbara Millis, and Margaret Cohen (Jossey Bass, 2008) , 2009 .

[71]  F. Schrag FROM HERE TO EQUALITY GRADING POLICIES FOR EGALITARIANS , 2001 .

[72]  D. Sadler Fidelity as a precondition for integrity in grading academic achievement , 2010 .

[73]  Martijn P. F. Berger,et al.  The effect of distributed practice on students’ conceptual understanding of statistics , 2011 .

[74]  N. Allen,et al.  Assessing dissimilarity relations under missing data conditions: evidence from computer simulations. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[75]  D. Sadler,et al.  Making Competent Judgments of Competence , 2013 .

[76]  Magda Osman Future-Minded: The Psychology of Agency and Control , 2014 .

[77]  Hilary Nesi,et al.  A Classification of Genre Families in University Student Writing. , 2013 .