Study of body weight shifting on robotic assisted gait rehabilitation with NaTUre-gaits

Therapist assisted body weight supported gait rehabilitation was introduced about 20 years ago. Subsequently, several robotic systems have been introduced for assisted body weight supported gait rehabilitation. However, pelvic assistance is not commonly found in those robotic systems. Lacking of pelvic assistance has several disadvantages. The most obvious disadvantage is the inability to promote body weight shifting during the gait rehabilitation. This work presents a pelvic assistance mechanism design to provide pelvic motion assistance during gait rehabilitation. The mechanism is a module found on NaTUre-gaits, a robotic system that provides gait rehabilitation in the context of over ground walking. The methodology of processing the pelvic motion for playback on the proposed pelvic assistance mechanism is discussed. The pelvic assistance mechanism is tested on human and ground reaction force was recorded for analysis of body weight shifting with/without pelvic motion assistance. It is found that the ground reaction force during robotic assisted walking is significantly affected due to the intervention of the robotic system. Future work is suggested for further study on other potential factors, which could have contributed to the change of the ground reaction force.

[1]  Sandra B. Davis,et al.  Locomotor training progression and outcomes after incomplete spinal cord injury. , 2005, Physical therapy.

[2]  Adela Tow,et al.  Effective Gait planning for robotic rehabilitation - From normal gait study to application in clinical rehabilitation , 2009, 2009 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics.

[3]  Henning Schmidt,et al.  Effect of different training modes on ground reaction forces during robot assisted floor walking and stair climbing , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[4]  Kiichi Kiriyama,et al.  Posterior-anterior body weight shift during stance period studied by measuring sole-floor reaction forces during healthy and hemiplegic human walking , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[5]  S. Hesse,et al.  Connecting research to the needs of patients and clinicians , 2009, Brain Research Bulletin.

[6]  S.J. Harkema,et al.  A Robot and Control Algorithm That Can Synchronously Assist in Naturalistic Motion During Body-Weight-Supported Gait Training Following Neurologic Injury , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  F. Zajac,et al.  Contributions of the individual ankle plantar flexors to support, forward progression and swing initiation during walking. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  H. Barbeau,et al.  Description and application of a system for locomotor rehabilitation , 1987, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[9]  H. Barbeau Locomotor Training in Neurorehabilitation: Emerging Rehabilitation Concepts , 2003, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[10]  M. HenryF.,et al.  Specificity vs.generality in learning motor skill , 1968 .

[11]  Reymond Clavel,et al.  The WalkTrainer: A Robotic System for Walking Rehabilitation , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[12]  Christopher L. Vaughan,et al.  Dynamics of human gait , 1992 .

[13]  S. Harkema,et al.  Locomotor training after human spinal cord injury: a series of case studies. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[14]  J. Hidler,et al.  Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lokomat in Subacute Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[15]  H. van der Kooij,et al.  Design and Evaluation of the LOPES Exoskeleton Robot for Interactive Gait Rehabilitation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[16]  S. Simon Gait Analysis, Normal and Pathological Function. , 1993 .

[17]  S. Hesse,et al.  Gait rehabilitation machines based on programmable footplates , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.