A framework for sustainable nanomaterial selection and design based on performance, hazard, and economic considerations

Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) and ENM-enabled products have emerged as potentially high-performance replacements to conventional materials and chemicals. As such, there is an urgent need to incorporate environmental and human health objectives into ENM selection and design processes. Here, an adapted framework based on the Ashby material selection strategy is presented as an enhanced selection and design process, which includes functional performance as well as environmental and human health considerations. The utility of this framework is demonstrated through two case studies, the design and selection of antimicrobial substances and conductive polymers, including ENMs, ENM-enabled products and their alternatives. Further, these case studies consider both the comparative efficacy and impacts at two scales: (i) a broad scale, where chemical/material classes are readily compared for primary decision-making, and (ii) within a chemical/material class, where physicochemical properties are manipulated to tailor the desired performance and environmental impact profile. Development and implementation of this framework can inform decision-making for the implementation of ENMs to facilitate promising applications and prevent unintended consequences.An adapted framework based on the Ashby material selection strategy can be used to select nanomaterials based on their functional performance and on their environmental and human health considerations.

[1]  Erik K Richman,et al.  The nanomaterial characterization bottleneck. , 2009, ACS nano.

[2]  Mary Ann Curran,et al.  Life cycle assessment as a tool to enhance the environmental performance of carbon nanotube products: a review , 2012 .

[3]  Elvin Karana,et al.  Material considerations in product design: A survey on crucial material aspects used by product designers , 2007 .

[4]  Mark A Chappell,et al.  Limitations of toxicity characterization in life cycle assessment: Can adverse outcome pathways provide a new foundation? , 2016, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[5]  Yen Wei,et al.  One-dimensional conducting polymer nanocomposites: Synthesis, properties and applications , 2011 .

[6]  Mehdi Shanbedi,et al.  Enhanced antibacterial activity of amino acids-functionalized multi walled carbon nanotubes by a simple method. , 2012, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[7]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Shape-Dependent Surface Reactivity and Antimicrobial Activity of Nano-Cupric Oxide. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Nanomaterials, Nanotechnologies and Design : An Introduction for Engineers and Architects , 2009 .

[9]  Julie B. Zimmerman,et al.  Designing nanomaterials to maximize performance and minimize undesirable implications guided by the Principles of Green Chemistry. , 2015, Chemical Society reviews.

[10]  Ashish Ranjan Sharma,et al.  Zebrafish: A complete animal model to enumerate the nanoparticle toxicity , 2016, Journal of Nanobiotechnology.

[11]  Y.-M. Deng,et al.  The role of materials identification and selection in engineering design , 2007 .

[12]  Ana Proykova,et al.  Dealing with nanosafety around the globe-Regulation vs. innovation. , 2016, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[13]  Paul M. Weaver,et al.  Green composites: A review of material attributes and complementary applications , 2014 .

[14]  Leanne M Gilbertson,et al.  Toward tailored functional design of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs): electrochemical and antimicrobial activity enhancement via oxidation and selective reduction. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  P. Anastas,et al.  Toward substitution with no regrets , 2015, Science.

[16]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Materials and the Environment: Eco-informed Material Choice , 2009 .

[17]  Yan Zhao,et al.  Zebrafish: an in vivo model for nano EHS studies. , 2013, Small.

[18]  Shikha Lohan,et al.  Studies on Enhancement of Anti-microbial Activity of Pristine MWCNTs Against Pathogens , 2015, AAPS PharmSciTech.

[19]  Kenneth A Dawson Leave the policing to others. , 2013, Nature nanotechnology.

[20]  P. Anastas,et al.  Toward Green Nano , 2008 .

[21]  Jan M. Lucht,et al.  Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops , 2015, Viruses.

[22]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Coupling Multicriteria Decision Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment for Nanomaterials , 2008 .

[23]  David Cebon,et al.  Materials Selection in Mechanical Design , 1992 .

[24]  Soumyo Mukherji,et al.  Size-controlled silver nanoparticles synthesized over the range 5–100 nm using the same protocol and their antibacterial efficacy , 2014 .

[25]  Bernd Nowack,et al.  A critical review of engineered nanomaterial release data: Are current data useful for material flow modeling? , 2016, Environmental pollution.

[26]  Ahmed A. Tayel,et al.  ANTIBACTERIAL ACTION OF ZINC OXIDE NANOPARTICLES AGAINST FOODBORNE PATHOGENS , 2011 .

[27]  T. Seager,et al.  Coupling multi-criteria decision analysis, life-cycle assessment, and risk assessment for emerging threats. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  Wouter Fransman,et al.  LICARA nanoSCAN - A tool for the self-assessment of benefits and risks of nanoproducts. , 2016, Environment international.

[29]  Paul S Weiss,et al.  Standardizing Nanomaterials. , 2016, ACS Nano.

[30]  Deborah Berhanu,et al.  The complexity of nanoparticle dissolution and its importance in nanotoxicological studies. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[31]  Wahid Khan,et al.  Alternative Antimicrobial Approach: Nano-Antimicrobial Materials , 2015, Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM.

[32]  S. Klaine,et al.  Paradigms to assess the environmental impact of manufactured nanomaterials , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[33]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  Standardizing data , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.