The Influence of Paratext on Narrative Persuasion: Fact, Fiction, or Fake?

The present research examined the role of personality factors and paratextual information about the reliability of a story on its persuasiveness. Study 1 (N = 135) was focused on recipients' explicit expectations about the trustworthiness/usefulness and the immersiveness/entertainment value of stories introduced as nonfiction, fiction, or fake. Study 2 (experimental, N = 186) demonstrated that a story was persuasive in all three paratext conditions (nonfiction, fiction, or fake versus belief-unrelated control story) and that its influence increased with the recipients' need for affect. Participants' need for cognition increased the difference in persuasiveness of a nonfictional versus a fake story. Additional mediation analyses suggest that fiction is more persuasive than fake because readers of fiction get more deeply transported into the story world.

[1]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  The Representation of Fictional Information , 1991 .

[2]  S. West,et al.  Experimental personality designs: analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. , 1996, Journal of personality.

[3]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  You are who you watch: Identification and transportation effects on temporary self-concept , 2010 .

[4]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[5]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  Fictional narratives change beliefs: Replications of Prentice, Gerrig, and Bailis (1997) with mixed corroboration , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  Robin L. Nabi,et al.  Explaining the Effects of Narrative in an Entertainment Television Program: Overcoming Resistance to Persuasion , 2010 .

[7]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  In the Mind's Eye Transportation-Imagery Model of Narrative Persuasion , 2002 .

[8]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  Transportation Into Narrative Worlds: The Role of Prior Knowledge and Perceived Realism , 2004 .

[9]  G. Maio,et al.  The need for affect: individual differences in the motivation to approach or avoid emotions. , 2001, Journal of personality.

[10]  S. Gosling,et al.  Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[11]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. , 1999 .

[12]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  Fact Versus Fiction Labeling: Persuasion Parity Despite Heightened Scrutiny of Fact , 2006 .

[13]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[14]  Markus Appel,et al.  Fictional Narratives Cultivate Just‐World Beliefs , 2008 .

[15]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  E. Paluck.  Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: a field experiment in Rwanda. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  David S. Miall.  Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading , 2000 .

[18]  Markus Appel,et al.  Predicting Emotions and Meta-Emotions at the Movies: The Role of the Need for Affect in Audiences’ Experience of Horror and Drama , 2010, Commun. Res..

[19]  Hollyn M. Johnson,et al.  Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences. , 1994 .

[20]  Wendy Wood,et al.  Forewarned and forearmed? Two meta-analytic syntheses of forewarnings of influence appeals. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Narrative Persuasion and Overcoming Resistance. , 2004 .

[22]  Helena Bilandzic,et al.  Measuring Narrative Engagement , 2009 .

[23]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  16 Simulated Worlds: Transportation Into Narratives , 2008 .

[24]  M. Leary,et al.  Handbook of individual differences in social behavior , 2009 .

[25]  G. Currie.  Fictional truth , 1986 .

[26]  Katherine Maynard,et al.  Six walks in the fictional woods , 1995 .

[27]  Jakob D. Jensen,et al.  The Delay Hypothesis: The Manifestation of Media Effects over Time. , 2011 .

[28]  Gerd Bohner,et al.  Need for cognition: eine Skala zur Erfassung von Engagement und Freude bei Denkaufgaben , 1991 .

[29]  L. Ross,et al.  Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Hans Hoeken,et al.  Identification as a Mechanism of Narrative Persuasion , 2012, Commun. Res..

[31]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. , 1998 .

[32]  Tobias Richter,et al.  Getting a Picture that Is Both Accurate and Stable: Situation Models and Epistemic Validation. , 2008 .

[33]  J. J. Strange,et al.  How Anecdotal Accounts in News and in Fiction Can Influence Judgments of a Social Problem’s Urgency, Causes, and Cures , 1999 .

[34]  Bertram Gawronski,et al.  Unraveling the Processes Underlying Evaluation: Attitudes from the Perspective of the Ape Model , 2007 .

[35]  Keith M. Johnston,et al.  Show Sold Separately: Promos, Spoilers and Other Media Paratexts , 2011 .

[36]  Tobias Richter,et al.  You don't have to believe everything you read: background knowledge permits fast and efficient validation of information. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Markus Appel.  A Story About a Stupid Person Can Make You Act Stupid (or Smart): Behavioral Assimilation (and Contrast) as Narrative Impact , 2011 .

[38]  C. Judd,et al.  When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  Seymour Epstein,et al.  Cognitive-experiential self-theory. , 1998 .

[40]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Learning facts from fiction. , 2003 .

[41]  G. Maio,et al.  Should Persuasion Be Affective or Cognitive? The Moderating Effects of Need for Affect and Need for Cognition , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[42]  E. Konijn,et al.  Emotions Bias Perceptions of Realism in Audiovisual Media: Why We May Take Fiction for Real , 2009 .

[43]  Rebecca L. Volpe.  “Please Help Me” , 2013, Narrative inquiry in bioethics.

[44]  A. Hayes.  Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium , 2009 .

[45]  Manche mögen’s heiß , 2008 .

[46]  S. Larsen,et al.  Cultural–historical knowledge and personal experience in appreciation of literature , 1990 .

[47]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[48]  Keith Oatley,et al.  Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes , 2009 .

[49]  C. B. Colby.  The weirdest people in the world , 1973 .

[50]  Michael D. Slater,et al.  Television Dramas and Support for Controversial Public Policies: Effects and Mechanisms , 2006 .

[51]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[52]  Markus Appel,et al.  Transportation and Need for Affect in Narrative Persuasion: A Mediated Moderation Model , 2010 .

[53]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[54]  Geoff F. Kaufman,et al.  Understanding Media Enjoyment: The Role of Transportation Into Narrative Worlds , 2004 .

[55]  Käte Hamburger.  Logik der Dichtung , 1957 .

[56]  S. Levinson,et al.  WEIRD languages have misled us, too , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[57]  Philip G. Zimbardo,et al.  The psychological impact of viewing the film JFK: Emotions, beliefs, and political behavioral intentions. , 1995 .

[58]  W. Gunn.  How We Die: Reflections on Life's Final Chapter , 1994 .

[59]  Ulf-Dietrich Reips,et al.  27 Behavioral Research and Data Collection via the Internet , 2005 .

[60]  R. Lebow.  If Mozart had Died at Your Age: Psychologic Versus Statistical Interence , 2006 .

[61]  M. Kreuter,et al.  Using Narrative Communication as a Tool for Health Behavior Change: A Conceptual, Theoretical, and Empirical Overview , 2007, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[62]  Elizabeth J Marsh,et al.  Slowing presentation speed increases illusions of knowledge , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[63]  Margrit Schreier,et al.  "Please Help Me; All I Want to Know Is: Is It Real or Not?": How Recipients View the Reality Status of The Blair Witch Project , 2004 .

[64]  Keith Oatley,et al.  The Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience , 2008, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[65]  Keith Oatley,et al.  On Being Moved by Art: How Reading Fiction Transforms the Self , 2009 .

[66]  Peter Lamarque,et al.  Truth, Fiction, and Literature: A Philosophical Perspective. , 1997 .

[67]  Keith Oatley,et al.  Why Fiction May be Twice as True as Fact: Fiction as Cognitive and Emotional Simulation , 1999 .

[68]  Elizabeth J Marsh,et al.  Learning errors from fiction: Difficulties in reducing reliance on fictional stories , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[69]  Markus Appel,et al.  Persuasive Effects of Fictional Narratives Increase Over Time , 2007 .

[70]  Michael F. Dahlstrom.  The Role of Causality in Information Acceptance in Narratives: An Example From Science Communication , 2010, Commun. Res..

[71]  T. Brock,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology the Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives Text Quality Individual Differences and Situational Influences Transportation Scale Items Gender Differences Discriminant Validation: Need for Cognition Effect of Text Manipulation Beli , 2022 .

[72]  K. Oatley,et al.  Effects of reading on knowledge, social abilities, and selfhood: Theory and empirical studies , 2008 .

[73]  Susan E. Morgan,et al.  The Power of Narratives: The Effect of Entertainment Television Organ Donation Storylines on the Attitudes, Knowledge, and Behaviors of Donors and Nondonors , 2009 .

[74]  Jordan B. Peterson,et al.  Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds , 2006 .

[75]  Dan Farrell,et al.  The Growth of Internet Research Methods and the Reluctant Sociologist , 2010 .

[76]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  Exploring the boundary between fiction and reality. , 1999 .

[77]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  This Story Is Not for Everyone: Transportability and Narrative Persuasion , 2010 .

[78]  L. Thurstone,et al.  Motion Pictures and the Social Attitudes of Children The Social Conduct and Attitudes of Movie Fans , 1933 .

[79]  Anja S. Göritz,et al.  Using Online Panels in Psychological Research , 2009 .

[80]  G. Clore,et al.  The Influence of Affect on Attitude , 2005 .

[81]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  What readers bring to the processing of fictional texts , 1997 .