Health care system and socioeconomic factors associated with variance in use of sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma in the United States.

PURPOSE Guidelines recommend sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for patients with clinical stage IB/II melanomas, but not clinical stage IA melanoma. This study examines factors associated with SLNB use for clinically node-negative melanoma. METHODS Patients diagnosed with clinically node-negative invasive melanoma in 2004 and 2005 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base. Regression models were developed to assess the association of clinicopathologic (sex, age, race/ethnicity, comorbidities, T stage), socioeconomic (insurance status, educational level, income), and hospital (hospital type, geographic area) factors with SLNB use. RESULTS A total of 16,598 patients were identified: 8,073 patients with clinical stage IA and 8,525 patients with clinical stage IB/II melanoma. For clinical stage IB/II melanoma, SLNB use was reported in 48.7% of patients. Patients with clinical stage IB/II melanoma were less likely to undergo SLNB if they were older than 75 years; had T1b tumors, no tumor ulceration, or head/neck or truncal lesions; were covered by Medicaid or Medicare; or lived in the Northeast, South, or West census regions. SLNB use was reported in 13.3% of patients with clinical stage IA melanoma and was more likely in patients who were younger than 56 years or lived in the Mountain or Pacific census regions. Patients treated at National Comprehensive Cancer Network-or National Cancer Institute-designated hospitals were most likely to undergo SLNB in adherence with national consensus guidelines. CONCLUSION SLNB use was associated with clinicopathologic factors but also with health system factors, including type of insurance, geographic area, and hospital type. These findings have implications for provider education and health policy.

[1]  J. Lang Survival for Patients With Invasive Cutaneous Melanoma Among Ethnic Groups: The Effects of Socioeconomic Status and Treatment , 2009 .

[2]  Amy Y. Chen,et al.  Association of Insurance Status and Ethnicity With Cancer Stage at Diagnosis for 12 Cancer Sites: A Retrospective Analysis , 2008 .

[3]  Amy Y. Chen,et al.  Disparities and trends in sentinel lymph node biopsy among early-stage breast cancer patients (1998-2005). , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2008 , 2008, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[5]  J. Thomas,et al.  Prognostic false-positivity of the sentinel node in melanoma , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Oncology.

[6]  S. Rosenberg Why perform sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with melanoma? , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Oncology.

[7]  C. Ko,et al.  The National Cancer Data Base: A Powerful Initiative to Improve Cancer Care in the United States , 2008, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[8]  D. Coit,et al.  Multivariate prognostic model for patients with thick cutaneous melanoma: Importance of sentinel lymph node status , 2002, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[9]  J. Lang Value of sentinel node status as a prognostic factor in melanoma: prospective observational study , 2007 .

[10]  P. G. Lang,et al.  Sentinel-Node Biopsy or Nodal Observation in Melanoma , 2007 .

[11]  E. Gershenwald Improved staging of node-negative patients with intermediate to thick melanomas (>1 mm) with the use of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy , 2007, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[12]  C. Balch,et al.  Sentinel-node biopsy in melanoma. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  N. Cascinelli,et al.  Sentinel and nonsentinel node status in stage IB and II melanoma patients: two-step prognostic indicators of survival. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  C. Balch,et al.  Socioeconomic and demographic factors associated with use of sentinel node biopsy and adjuvant biologic response modifiers in melanoma. , 2006, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  C. Masi,et al.  Racial and ethnic disparities in breast cancer mortality: are we doing enough to address the root causes? , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  Charles R. Thomas,et al.  Disparities in cancer care: a worldwide perspective and roadmap for change. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  O. Olopade,et al.  Colorectal cancer model of health disparities: understanding mortality differences in minority populations. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  Xianglin L. Du,et al.  Population-based assessment of surgical treatment trends for patients with melanoma in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  S. Soong,et al.  Clinical Significance of Occult Metastatic Melanoma in Sentinel Lymph Nodes and Other High-risk Factors Based on Long-term Follow-up , 2005, World Journal of Surgery.

[20]  K. McMasters What Good is Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma if it does not Improve Survival? , 2004, Annals of surgical oncology.

[21]  Jeremy MG Taylor,et al.  Mitotic Rate and Younger Age Are Predictors of Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity: Lessons Learned From the Generation of a Probabilistic Model , 2004, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[22]  A. Stewart,et al.  The National Cancer Data Base: A clinical surveillance and quality improvement tool , 2004 .

[23]  C. Begg,et al.  The Effect of Clustering of Outcomes on the Association of Procedure Volume and Surgical Outcomes , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[24]  E. McGlynn,et al.  The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  Jeffrey E. Lee,et al.  Revised American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Criteria Accurately Predict Sentinel Lymph Node Positivity in Clinically Node-Negative Melanoma Patients , 2003, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[26]  H. Gietema,et al.  Clinical outcome of stage I/II melanoma patients after selective sentinel lymph node dissection: long-term follow-up results. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  M. Ross,et al.  Patterns of early recurrence after sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma. , 2002, American journal of surgery.

[28]  S. Dinehart,et al.  Sentinel node biopsy for melanoma: what is the evidence? , 2001, Archives of dermatology.

[29]  M. Ross,et al.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: controversy despite widespread agreement. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  M. Ross,et al.  Improved Staging of Node-Negative Patients With Intermediate to Thick Melanomas (>1 mm) With the Use of Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , 2001, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[31]  M. Ross,et al.  Multi-institutional melanoma lymphatic mapping experience: the prognostic value of sentinel lymph node status in 612 stage I or II melanoma patients. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  B. Eisenberg,et al.  NCCN MELANOMA PRACTICE GUIDELINES , 1998 .

[33]  A. Buzaid,et al.  NCCN melanoma practice guidelines. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. , 1998, Oncology.

[34]  R. Lew,et al.  Cutaneous melanoma mortality among the socioeconomically disadvantaged in Massachusetts. , 1996, American journal of public health.

[35]  R. Deyo,et al.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[36]  D L Morton,et al.  Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. , 1992, Archives of surgery.

[37]  R. Deyo,et al.  ADAPTING A CLINICAL COMORBIDITY USE WITH ICD-g-CM ADMINISTRATIVE INDEX FOR DATABASES , 1992 .

[38]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[39]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.