Automated in vivo patch-clamp evaluation of extracellular multielectrode array spike recording capability.

Much innovation is currently aimed at improving the number, density, and geometry of electrodes on extracellular multielectrode arrays for in vivo recording of neural activity in the mammalian brain. To choose a multielectrode array configuration for a given neuroscience purpose, or to reveal design principles of future multielectrode arrays, it would be useful to have a systematic way of evaluating the spike recording capability of such arrays. We describe an automated system that performs robotic patch-clamp recording of a neuron being simultaneously recorded via an extracellular multielectrode array. By recording a patch-clamp data set from a neuron while acquiring extracellular recordings from the same neuron, we can evaluate how well the extracellular multielectrode array captures the spiking information from that neuron. To demonstrate the utility of our system, we show that it can provide data from the mammalian cortex to evaluate how the spike sorting performance of a close-packed extracellular multielectrode array is affected by bursting, which alters the shape and amplitude of spikes in a train. We also introduce an algorithmic framework to help evaluate how the number of electrodes in a multielectrode array affects spike sorting, examining how adding more electrodes yields data that can be spike sorted more easily. Our automated methodology may thus help with the evaluation of new electrode designs and configurations, providing empirical guidance on the kinds of electrodes that will be optimal for different brain regions, cell types, and species, for improving the accuracy of spike sorting. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We present an automated strategy for evaluating the spike recording performance of an extracellular multielectrode array, by enabling simultaneous recording of a neuron with both such an array and with patch clamp. We use our robot and accompanying algorithms to evaluate the performance of multielectrode arrays on supporting spike sorting.

[1]  M S Lewicki,et al.  A review of methods for spike sorting: the detection and classification of neural action potentials. , 1998, Network.

[2]  Cyrille Rossant,et al.  Spike sorting for large, dense electrode arrays , 2015 .

[3]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Mapping a Complete Neural Population in the Retina , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Phase relationship between hippocampal place units and the EEG theta rhythm , 1993, Hippocampus.

[5]  David Jäckel,et al.  Applicability of independent component analysis on high-density microelectrode array recordings. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  B L McNaughton,et al.  Dynamics of the hippocampal ensemble code for space. , 1993, Science.

[7]  Itzhak Fried,et al.  Single neuron burst firing in the human hippocampus during sleep , 2002, Hippocampus.

[8]  Diego Contreras,et al.  Electrophysiological classes of neocortical neurons , 2004, Neural Networks.

[9]  Klaus Obermayer,et al.  An online spike detection and spike classification algorithm capable of instantaneous resolution of overlapping spikes , 2009, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[10]  Srinjoy Mitra,et al.  A Neural Probe With Up to 966 Electrodes and Up to 384 Configurable Channels in 0.13 $\mu$m SOI CMOS , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[11]  Edward S. Boyden,et al.  A direct-to-drive neural data acquisition system , 2015, Front. Neural Circuits.

[12]  Sotiris C Masmanidis,et al.  Brain activity mapping at multiple scales with silicon microprobes containing 1,024 electrodes. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Edward S Boyden,et al.  Closed-loop, ultraprecise, automated craniotomies. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Kenneth D. Harris,et al.  Fast and accurate spike sorting of high-channel count probes with KiloSort , 2016, NIPS.

[15]  Eran Stark,et al.  Large-scale, high-density (up to 512 channels) recording of local circuits in behaving animals. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Nancy Kopell,et al.  Close-Packed Silicon Microelectrodes for Scalable Spatially Oversampled Neural Recording , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Michael L. Roukes,et al.  Nanofabricated Neural Probes for Dense 3-D Recordings of Brain Activity , 2016, Nano letters.

[18]  Brain activity. , 2014, Nature nanotechnology.

[19]  C. Koch,et al.  On the origin of the extracellular action potential waveform: A modeling study. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Kenneth L. Shepard,et al.  A very large-scale microelectrode array for cellular-resolution electrophysiology , 2017, Nature Communications.

[21]  J. Csicsvari,et al.  Intracellular features predicted by extracellular recordings in the hippocampus in vivo. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Thomas Wachtler,et al.  Unsupervised neural spike sorting for high-density microelectrode arrays with convolutive independent component analysis , 2016, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[23]  G. Buzsáki Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Suhasa B. Kodandaramaiah,et al.  Automated whole-cell patch clamp electrophysiology of neurons in vivo , 2012, Nature Methods.

[25]  T. Blanche,et al.  Polytrodes: high-density silicon electrode arrays for large-scale multiunit recording. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Jeremy F. Magland,et al.  A Fully Automated Approach to Spike Sorting , 2017, Neuron.

[27]  C. Koch,et al.  Cell type- and activity-dependent extracellular correlates of intracellular spiking. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Andreas Hierlemann,et al.  Combination of High-density Microelectrode Array and Patch Clamp Recordings to Enable Studies of Multisynaptic Integration , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[29]  Nicholas V. Swindale,et al.  Spike sorting for polytrodes: a divide and conquer approach , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[30]  Daniel K. Hartline,et al.  Separation of multi-unit nerve impulse trains by a multi-channel linear filter algorithm , 1975, Brain Research.

[31]  S. Takahashi,et al.  Real-time and automatic sorting of multi-neuronal activity for sub-millisecond interactions in vivo , 2005, Neuroscience.

[32]  W. Freygang,et al.  EXTRACELLULAR POTENTIALS FROM SINGLE SPINAL MOTONEURONS , 1959, The Journal of general physiology.

[33]  Klaus Obermayer,et al.  Improved optimal linear filters for the discrimination of multichannel waveform templates for spike-sorting applications , 2006, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[34]  Vijay Viswam,et al.  A 1024-Channel CMOS Microelectrode Array With 26,400 Electrodes for Recording and Stimulation of Electrogenic Cells In Vitro , 2014, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[35]  Kenneth D Harris,et al.  Towards reliable spike-train recordings from thousands of neurons with multielectrodes , 2012, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[36]  Pedro Barquinha,et al.  “Validating silicon polytrodes with paired juxtacellular recordings: method and dataset” , 2016 .

[37]  R. Quian Quiroga,et al.  Unsupervised Spike Detection and Sorting with Wavelets and Superparamagnetic Clustering , 2004, Neural Computation.

[38]  B W Connors,et al.  Synchronized excitation and inhibition driven by intrinsically bursting neurons in neocortex. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  Supratim Ray Challenges in the quantification and interpretation of spike-LFP relationships , 2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[40]  Kip A Ludwig,et al.  Using a common average reference to improve cortical neuron recordings from microelectrode arrays. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  Bruce L. McNaughton,et al.  The stereotrode: A new technique for simultaneous isolation of several single units in the central nervous system from multiple unit records , 1983, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[42]  J. Csicsvari,et al.  Accuracy of tetrode spike separation as determined by simultaneous intracellular and extracellular measurements. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  Terrence J Sejnowski,et al.  Validation of independent component analysis for rapid spike sorting of optical recording data. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  D. Kleinfeld,et al.  Variability of extracellular spike waveforms of cortical neurons. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  Suhasa B Kodandaramaiah,et al.  Assembly and operation of the autopatcher for automated intracellular neural recording in vivo , 2016, Nature Protocols.

[46]  David Tsai,et al.  High-channel-count, high-density microelectrode array for closed-loop investigation of neuronal networks , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[47]  B. Connors,et al.  Electrophysiological properties of neocortical neurons in vitro. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  D. Tank,et al.  In vivo dendritic calcium dynamics in deep-layer cortical pyramidal neurons , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.