Calibration of agricultural risk programming models

Positive Mathematical Programming (PMP) is one of the most commonly used methods for calibrating activity programming models. In this article we consider PMP as a calibration method for risk programming models with a mean-variance (E-V) specification. We argue that the restrictive theoretical assumptions employed by typical linear E-V models limit their applicability in analyzing the effects of decoupled payments on agricultural production decisions. Furthermore, the requirement for eliciting a risk aversion coefficient renders such models incompatible with the PMP method. For this reason we propose a nonlinear E-V specification and develop a PMP-based procedure for its calibration which does not aim at introducing (further) nonlinearities in the objective function, but at recovering the “true” distribution of wealth that will allow the final model to reproduce base year observations. We also examine how our approach relates to the recent PMP developments on calibration against elasticity priors and we show how such priors can be used for the calibration of the nonlinear E-V model.

[1]  Richard E. Howitt,et al.  A CALIBRATION METHOD FOR AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC PRODUCTION MODELS , 1995 .

[2]  David Zilberman,et al.  Effects of decoupling on the mean and variability of output , 2006 .

[3]  A. Sandmo.  On the theory of the competitive firm under price uncertainty , 1971 .

[4]  M. Best,et al.  On the Sensitivity of Mean-Variance-Efficient Portfolios to Changes in Asset Means: Some Analytical and Computational Results , 1991 .

[5]  Laura Riesgo,et al.  An MCDM analysis of agricultural risk aversion , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  S. Misra,et al.  Crop‐Yield Distributions Revisited , 2003 .

[7]  J. Pratt.  RISK AVERSION IN THE SMALL AND IN THE LARGE11This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant NSF-G24035). Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government. , 1964 .

[8]  Simone Severini,et al.  Modeling farmer participation to a revenue insurance scheme by means of Positive Mathematical Programming , 2011 .

[9]  R. Freund.  THE INTRODUCTION OF RISK INTO A PROGRAMMING MODEL , 1956 .

[10]  B. McCarl,et al.  An Investigation of the Relationship Between Constraint Omission and Risk Aversion in Firm Risk Programming Models , 1986, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[11]  John Helming,et al.  Assessing the consequences of environmental policy scenarios in Flemish agriculture , 2001 .

[12]  David Hennessy,et al.  The Production Effects of Agricultural Income Support Policies Under Uncertainty , 1998 .

[13]  Amos Golan,et al.  Estimation and inference with censored and ordered multinomial response data , 1997 .

[14]  H. Levy,et al.  Approximating Expected Utility by a Function of Mean and Variance , 1979 .

[15]  Peter B. R. Hazell,et al.  Mathematical Programming for Economic Analysis in Agriculture. , 1987 .

[16]  Richard E. Howitt,et al.  An Analysis of Ill‐Posed Production Problems Using Maximum Entropy , 1998 .

[17]  Martin K. van Ittersum,et al.  Assessing the Forecasting Performance of a Generic Bio-Economic Farm Model Calibrated With Two Different PMP Variants , 2010 .

[18]  Michael R. Caputo,et al.  Comparative statics of the generalized maximum entropy estimator of the general linear model , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Richard E. Howitt,et al.  Positive Mathematical Programming , 1995 .

[20]  Thomas Heckelei,et al.  Positive Mathematical Programming Approaches - Recent Developments in Literature and Applied Modelling , 2012 .

[21]  S. Tsiang.  The Rationale of the Mean-Standard Deviation Analysis, Skewness Preference, and the Demand for Money , 1972 .

[22]  Alexandre Gohin,et al.  La programmation mathématique positive dans les modèles d'exploitation agricole. Principes et importance du calibrage , 1999, Cahiers d'Economie et sociologie rurales.

[23]  Lawrence B. Pulley,et al.  Mean-Variance Approximations to Expected Logarithmic Utility , 1983, Oper. Res..

[24]  D. Just,et al.  Is Expected Utility Theory Applicable? A Revealed Preference Test , 2010 .

[25]  J. Antle.  Incorporating Risk in Production Analysis , 1983 .

[26]  Roger D. Norton,et al.  Operations research methods in agricultural policy analysis , 1982 .

[27]  Hendrik Wolff,et al.  Estimation of constrained optimisation models for agricultural supply analysis based on generalised maximum entropy , 2003 .

[28]  Yves Surry,et al.  The Use of Maximum Entropy to Estimate Input‐Output Coefficients From Regional Farm Accounting Data , 2008 .

[29]  Fujin Yi,et al.  A Fully Calibrated Generalized Constant‐Elasticity‐Of‐Substitution Programming Model of Agricultural Supply , 2011 .

[30]  T. Wiens.  Peasant Risk Aversion and Allocative Behavior: A Quadratic Programming Experiment , 1976 .

[31]  B. McCarl,et al.  The Tradeoff between Expected Return and Risk Among Cornbelt Farmers , 1978 .

[32]  Moshe Levy,et al.  The Benefits of Differential Variance-Based Constraints in Portfolio Optimization , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Quirino Paris,et al.  Revenue and Cost Uncertainty, Generalized Mean-Variance, and the Linear Complementarity Problem , 1979 .

[34]  Pierre R. Merel,et al.  Exact calibration of programming models of agricultural supply against exogenous supply elasticities , 2010 .

[35]  Torbjörn Jansson,et al.  Estimating a Primal Model of Regional Crop Supply in the European Union , 2011 .