Classification of 1H MR spectra of human brain neoplasms: The influence of preprocessing and computerized consensus diagnosis on classification accuracy

We study how classification accuracy can be improved when both different data preprocessing methods and computerized consensus diagnosis (CCD) are applied to 1H magnetic resonance (MR) spectra of astrocytomas, meningiomas, and epileptic brain tissue. The MR spectra (360 MHz, 37°C) of tissue specimens (biopsies) from subjects with meningiomas (95; 26 cases), astrocytomas (74; 26 cases), and epilepsy (37; 8 cases) were preprocessed by several methods. Each data set was partitioned into training and validation sets. Robust classification was carried out via linear discriminant analysis (LDA), artificial neural nets (NN), and CCD, and the results were compared with histopathological diagnosis of the MR specimens. Normalization of the relevant spectral regions affects classification accuracy significantly. The spectra‐based average three‐class classification accuracies of LDA and NN increased from 81.7% (unnormalized data sets) to 89.9% (normalized). CCD increased the classification accuracy of the normalized sets to an average of 91.8%. CCD invariably decreases the fraction of unclassifiable spectra. The same trends prevail, with improved results, for casebased classification. Preprocessing the 1H MR spectra is essential for accurate and reliable classification of astrocytomas, meningiomas, and nontumorous epileptic brain tissue. CCD improves classification accuracy, with an attendant decrease in the fraction of unclassifiable spectra or cases.

[1]  J. Frahm,et al.  Localized proton NMR spectroscopy of brain tumors using short-echo time STEAM sequences. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  J. Saunders,et al.  A simple procedure for obtaining high‐quality nmr spectra of semiquantitative value from small tissue specimens: cervical biopsies. , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  A Haase,et al.  High‐resolution one‐and two‐dimensional 1H MRS of human brain tumor and normal glial cells , 1994, NMR in biomedicine.

[4]  B. Flury Common Principal Components and Related Multivariate Models , 1988 .

[5]  David H. Wolpert,et al.  Stacked generalization , 1992, Neural Networks.

[6]  Ian C. P. Smith,et al.  1H MRS of high grade astrocytomas: Mobile lipid accumulation in necrotic tissue , 1994, NMR in biomedicine.

[7]  R. Palmer,et al.  Introduction to the theory of neural computation , 1994, The advanced book program.

[8]  H. Bachelard,et al.  25 Years of The International Society for Neurochemistry , 1993 .

[9]  P. Kelly,et al.  Grading of astrocytomas: A simple and reproducible method , 1988, Cancer.

[10]  J. E. Jackson A User's Guide to Principal Components , 1991 .

[11]  G. McLachlan Discriminant Analysis and Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1992 .

[12]  G Friedmann,et al.  Human brain tumors: spectral patterns detected with localized H-1 MR spectroscopy. , 1992, Radiology.

[13]  H. Bachelard,et al.  NMR Spectroscopy in Neurochemistry , 1993, Journal of Neurochemistry.

[14]  Peter Russell,et al.  Computerized Consensus Diagnosis: A Classification Strategy for the Robust Analysis of MR Spectra. I. Application to 1H Spectra of Thyroid Neoplasms , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  G. Sutherland,et al.  Mobile lipids and metabolic heterogeneity of brain tumours as detectable by Ex Vivo 1H MR spectroscopy , 1994, NMR in biomedicine.

[16]  G. Sutherland,et al.  High‐Resolution 1H NMR spectroscopy studies of extracts of human cerebral neoplasms , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  J. Saunders,et al.  Classification of Brain Tumors by Ex Vivo 1H NMR Spectroscopy , 1995, Journal of neurochemistry.

[18]  J Hennig,et al.  Human brain tumors: assessment with in vivo proton MR spectroscopy. , 1993, Radiology.