Customizing Europe: transposition as bottom-up implementation

ABSTRACT European Union (EU) implementation research has neglected situations when member states go beyond the minimum requirements prescribed in EU directives (gold-plating). The top–down focus on compliance insufficiently accounts for the fact that positive integration actually allows member states to transcend the EU's requirements to facilitate context-sensitive problem-solving. This study adopts a bottom–up implementation perspective. Moving beyond compliance, it introduces the concept of ‘customization’ to depict how transposition results in tailor-made solutions in a multilevel system. The study analyses the hitherto unexplored veterinary drug regulations of four member states. Using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis and formal theory evaluation, this article assesses how policy and country-level factors interact. Results reveal the countries’ different customization styles. The latter simultaneously reflect the interplay of domestic politics with institutions, and the ‘fit’ of EU regulatory modes with domestic, sectoral interventionist styles. Compliance approaches cannot fully explain these fine-grained patterns of Europeanization.

[1]  Richard Macrory,et al.  ‘Gold Plating’ of European Environmental Measures? , 2009 .

[2]  Michael Kaeding,et al.  Europeanization Beyond the Goodness of Fit: Domestic Politics in the Forefront , 2006 .

[3]  Oliver Treib,et al.  Implementing and complying with EU governance outputs , 2006 .

[4]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis , 2012 .

[5]  R. Morris The application of the Habitats Directive in the UK: Compliance or gold plating? , 2011 .

[6]  B. Steunenberg,et al.  Comparing transposition in the 27 member states of the EU: the impact of discretion and legal fit , 2009 .

[7]  T. König,et al.  HOW ROBUST ARE COMPLIANCE FINDINGS? A RESEARCH SYNTHESIS , 2012 .

[8]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: Contents , 2012 .

[9]  Lars Tummers Book review of: Enforcement Matters: Enforcement and Compliance of European Directives in Four Member States / E. Versluis. - Delft: Eburon, 2003 , 2006 .

[10]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Fuzzy-Set Social Science , 2001 .

[11]  Sara Berglund Complying with Europe: EU Harmonisation and Soft Law in the Member States , 2007 .

[12]  F. Sager,et al.  Confronting Theories of European Integration: A Comparative Congruence Analysis of Veterinary Drug Regulations in Five Countries , 2014 .

[13]  Andrea Lenschow,et al.  Coping with Europe : the impact of British and German administrations on the implementation of EU environmental policy , 1998 .

[14]  F. Sager Governance and Coercion , 2009 .

[15]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: Potential pitfalls and suggestions for solutions , 2012 .

[16]  B. Steunenberg A policy solution to the European Union's transposition puzzle: Interaction of interests in different domestic arenas , 2007 .

[17]  Esther Versluis,et al.  Enforcement Matters: Enforcement And Compliance Of European Directives In Four Member States , 2007 .

[18]  Christoph Knill,et al.  Regulatory policy outputs and impacts: Exploring a complex relationship , 2012 .

[19]  Gerda Falkner,et al.  Modes of governance: towards a conceptual clarification , 2007 .

[20]  Ellen Mastenbroek,et al.  EU compliance: Still a ‘black hole’? , 2005 .

[21]  Evert Vedung,et al.  Policy instruments : Typologies and theories , 1998 .

[22]  Markus Haverland,et al.  National Adaptation to European Integration: The Importance of Institutional Veto Points , 2000, Journal of Public Policy.

[23]  D. Toshkov Taking stock: a review of quantitative studies of transposition and implementation of EU law , 2010 .

[24]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders , 1998, International Organization.

[25]  Annica Kronsell,et al.  The willing, the unwilling and the unable – explaining implementation of the EU Biofuels Directive , 2010 .

[26]  Annette Elisabeth Töller Measuring and Comparing the Europeanization of National Legislation: A Research Note , 2010 .

[27]  George Tsebelis,et al.  Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism , 1995, British Journal of Political Science.

[28]  Christoph Knill,et al.  The national impact of European Union regulatory policy: Three Europeanization mechanisms , 2002 .

[29]  Giandomenico Majone,et al.  Regulation in Comparative Perspective , 1999 .

[30]  E. Neumayer,et al.  Implementing Multilateral Environmental Agreements: An Analysis of EU Directives , 2007, Global Environmental Politics.

[31]  Tanja A. Börzel,et al.  From Europeanisation to Diffusion: Introduction , 2012, From Europeanisation to Diffusion.

[32]  Andrea Lenschow,et al.  Modes of Regulation in the Governance of the European Union: Towards a Comprehensive Evaluation , 2003 .

[33]  S. Schmidt Beyond Compliance: The Europeanization of Member States through Negative Integration and Legal Uncertainty , 2008 .

[34]  Michael Hill,et al.  Implementing public policy , 2002 .