A NEW ONTOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE FOR INTEGRATION OF SOCIAL AND PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENTS: DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION CONTEXT

Abstract. Social dimension of environment is an important aspect that should be reflected in research works related to studying the interactions between human and the environment. However, this dimension is usually neglected when representing the environment in geographic information systems for different applications. For instance, disability as a result of the interaction between human and environment is influenced by social and physical dimensions of environment. Although, this aspect is highlighted in most conceptual disability models by defining various taxonomies of the environment, from ontological perspective justifying and connecting social dimension to the physical dimension of the environment is not clearly determined. Integrating social dimension of the environment with its physical dimension for disability studies is a challenging task, which is the main objective of the present study. Here, we review some of the disability models and their perspective about classifying the environment. Then, from ontological perspective, their limitations are discussed and a new approach for the classification of concepts form the environment is presented. This approach facilitates and simplifies integration of social dimension in ontologies for more effective assessment of disability issue in Geographic Information System.

[1]  B. McFadyen,et al.  Disability, Rehabilitation Research and Post-Cartesian Embodied Ontologies – Has the Research Paradigm Changed? , 2014 .

[2]  W H Warren,et al.  Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  David Briggs,et al.  Modelling Access with GIS in Urban Systems (MAGUS): capturing the experiences of wheelchair users , 2003 .

[4]  Hassan A. Karimi,et al.  Personalised routing for wheelchair navigation , 2009, J. Locat. Based Serv..

[5]  Chantal Berdier An Ontology for Urban Mobility , 2011 .

[6]  G. Whiteneck,et al.  Quantifying environmental factors: a measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  Fernandez Lopez,et al.  Overview Of Methodologies For Building Ontologies , 1999, IJCAI 1999.

[8]  Sumit Sen Use of Affordances in Geospatial Ontologies , 2006, Towards Affordance-Based Robot Control.

[9]  Sabine Timpf Ontologies of Wayfinding: a Traveler's Perspective , 2002 .

[10]  E. Brandt,et al.  Enabling America: Assessing the Role of Rehabilitation Science and Engineering , 1997 .

[11]  Martin L. King,et al.  Towards a Methodology for Building Ontologies , 1995 .

[12]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[13]  Catherine Roussey,et al.  Urban Ontologies: the Towntology Prototype towards Case Studies , 2007, Ontologies for Urban Development.

[14]  Sabine Timpf,et al.  Modelling the Suitability of Urban Networks for Pedestrians: An Affordance-Based Framework , 2013, AGILE Conf..