Power Law Distributions of Patents as Indicators of Innovation

The total number of patents produced by a country (or the number of patents produced per capita) is often used as an indicator for innovation. Here we present evidence that the distribution of patents amongst applicants within many countries is well-described by power laws with exponents that vary between 1.66 (Japan) and 2.37 (Poland). We suggest that this exponent is a useful new metric for studying innovation. Using simulations based on simple preferential attachment-type rules that generate power laws, we find we can explain some of the variation in exponents between countries, with countries that have larger numbers of patents per applicant generally exhibiting smaller exponents in both the simulated and actual data. Similarly we find that the exponents for most countries are inversely correlated with other indicators of innovation, such as research and development intensity or the ubiquity of export baskets. This suggests that in more advanced economies, which tend to have smaller values of the exponent, a greater proportion of the total number of patents are filed by large companies than in less advanced countries.

[1]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  Urban Scaling and Its Deviations: Revealing the Structure of Wealth, Innovation and Crime across Cities , 2010, PloS one.

[2]  F. Carmignani,et al.  Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. , 2012 .

[3]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Growth in Cities , 1991, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  Yoshi Fujiwara,et al.  Do Pareto–Zipf and Gibrat laws hold true? An analysis with European firms , 2004 .

[5]  Jean O. Lanjouw,et al.  How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data , 1996 .

[6]  H. Takayasu,et al.  Zipf's law in income distribution of companies , 1999 .

[7]  C. I. Jones,et al.  The Shape of Production Function and the Direction of Technical Change , 2004 .

[8]  H. Simon,et al.  ON A CLASS OF SKEW DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS , 1955 .

[9]  Khadija Iqbal,et al.  An introduction , 1996, Neurobiology of Aging.

[10]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[11]  F. E..  Principles of Economics , 1890, Nature.

[12]  P. Romer.  Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  César A. Hidalgo,et al.  The building blocks of economic complexity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Christian Ghiglino,et al.  Random walk to innovation: Why productivity follows a power law , 2012, J. Econ. Theory.

[15]  Erzo G. J. Luttmer.  On the Mechanics of Firm Growth , 2008 .

[16]  M. Newman.  Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law , 2005 .

[17]  New Zealand Science Review , 1954, Nature.

[18]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[19]  Michael Mitzenmacher,et al.  A Brief History of Generative Models for Power Law and Lognormal Distributions , 2004, Internet Math..

[20]  G. Yule,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evolution Based on the Conclusions of Dr. J. C. Willis, F.R.S. , 1925 .

[21]  James H. Brown,et al.  A General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology , 1997, Science.

[22]  Gary G Yen,et al.  Group-based Yule model for bipartite author-paper networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  D. Helbing,et al.  Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  E. Andrade.  Contemporary Physics , 1945, Nature.

[25]  Erzo G. J. Luttmer.  Selection, Growth, and the Size Distribution of Firms , 2007 .

[26]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Accessibility of Cities in the Digital Economy , 2004, cond-mat/0412004.

[27]  Redaktionen.  THE REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES , 1960 .

[28]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[29]  R. Axtell.  Zipf Distribution of U.S. Firm Sizes , 2001, Science.

[30]  R. Blundell,et al.  Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms , 1999 .

[31]  Samuel Arbesman,et al.  Superlinear scaling for innovation in cities. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.