SCALE STRUCTURE AND THE SEMANTIC TYPOLOGY OF GRADABLE PREDICATES

In this paper we develop a semantic typology of gradable predicates, with special emphasis on deverbal adjectives. We argue for the linguistic relevance of this typology by demonstrating that the distribution and interpretation of degree modifiers is sensitive to its two major classificatory parameters: (1) whether a gradable predicate is associated with what we call an OPEN or CLOSED scale and (2) whether the standard of comparison for the applicability of the predicate is ABSOLUTE or RELATIVE to a context. We further show that the classification of adjectives within the typology is largely predictable. Specifically, the scale structure of a deverbal gradable adjective correlates either with the algebraic part structure of the event denoted by its source verb or with the part structure of the entities to which the adjective applies. These correlations underscore the fact that gradability is characteristic not only of adjectives but also of verbs and nouns, and that scalar properties are shared by categorially distinct but derivationally-related expressions.∗

[1]  M. Cresswell THE SEMANTICS OF DEGREE , 1976 .

[2]  Christopher Kennedy The Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison , 1999 .

[3]  I. Heim Degree Operators and Scope , 2000 .

[4]  E. Sapir Grading, A Study in Semantics , 1944, Philosophy of Science.

[5]  B. Levin,et al.  Scalar Structure Underlies Telicity in "Degree Achievements" , 1999 .

[6]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  The Generative Lexicon , 1995, CL.

[7]  Christopher Kennedy,et al.  Polar Opposition and the Ontology of ‘Degrees’ , 2001 .

[8]  Ewan Klein,et al.  A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives , 1980 .

[9]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Word Meaning and Montague Grammar , 1979 .

[11]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Thematic Relations as Links between Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution , 1992 .

[12]  Christopher Kennedy,et al.  From Event Structure to Scale Structure: Degree Modification in Deverbal Adjectives , 1999 .

[13]  Kai-Uwe Von Fintel,et al.  Restrictions on quantifier domains , 1994 .

[14]  Jen Hay,et al.  The Non-Uniformity of Degree Achievements , 1998 .

[15]  Manfred Bierwisch,et al.  The Semantics of Gradation , 1989 .

[16]  Sally McConnell-Ginet,et al.  Comparative constructions in English : a syntactic and semantic analysis , 1973 .

[17]  David R. Dowty Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .

[18]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation , 1999, Cognition.

[19]  C. Barker The Dynamics of Vagueness , 2002 .

[20]  R. Jackendoff The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in english , 1996 .

[21]  Youngeun Yoon,et al.  Total and partial predicates and the weak and strong interpretations , 1996 .

[22]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  MY REACTION TO CRESSWELL'S, HELLAN'S, HOEKSEMA'S AND SEUREN'S COMMENTS , 1984 .

[23]  Hotze Rullmann,et al.  Maximality in the semantics of wh -constructions , 1995 .

[24]  Christopher Kennedy,et al.  Gradable adjectives denote measure functions, not partial functions , 1999 .

[25]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Nominal Reference, Temporal Constitution and Quantification in Event Semantics , 1989 .

[26]  Natsuko Tsujimura Degree words and scalar structure in Japanese , 2001 .

[27]  Peter Lasersohn Plurality, Conjunction and Events , 1994 .

[28]  Yoko Yumoto,et al.  THE ROLE OF ASPECTUAL FEATURES IN MORPHOLOGY , 1991 .

[29]  D. Fara Shifting sands: An interest relative theory of vagueness , 2000 .

[30]  Carita Paradis Adjectives and boundedness , 2001 .

[31]  John Knowles The Degree Adverbial , 1974 .

[32]  Roger Schwarzschild,et al.  Interval Semantics for Scalar Predication , 1999 .

[33]  Christopher Kennedy,et al.  On the monotonicity of polar adjectives , 2001 .

[34]  J. Stanley Context and Logical Form , 2000 .

[35]  A. Kyburg,et al.  Fitting Words: Vague Language in Context , 2000 .

[36]  A. Lehrer Markedness and antonymy , 1985, Journal of Linguistics.

[37]  L. Hellan Towards an integrated analysis of comparatives , 1981 .

[38]  A. Stechow COMPARING SEMANTIC THEORIES OF COMPARISON , 1984 .

[39]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar , 1972 .

[40]  Pieter A. M. Seuren The structure and selection of positive and negative gradable adjectives , 1978 .

[41]  Renate Bartsch,et al.  Semantic structures : a study in the relation between semantics and syntax , 1972 .

[42]  Beth Levin,et al.  Telicity Corresponds to Degree of Change , 2002 .

[43]  Carol L. Tenny,et al.  How motion verbs are special: The interaction of semantic and pragmatic information in aspectual verb meanings , 1995 .

[44]  Peter Ludlow,et al.  Implicit comparison classes , 1989 .

[45]  G. Gazdar A Phrase Structure Syntax for Comparative Clauses , 1980 .