Detrimental influence of contextual change on spacing effects in free recall.

Two experiments were conducted to determine the mechanism underlying the spacing effect in free-recall tasks. Participants were required to study a list containing once-presented words as well as massed and spaced repetitions. In both experiments, presentation background at repetition was manipulated. The results of Experiment 1 demonstrated that free recall was higher for massed items repeated in a different context than for massed items repeated in the same context, whereas free recall for spaced items was higher when repeated in the same context. Furthermore, a spacing effect was shown for words repeated in the same context, whereas an attenuated spacing effect was revealed for words repeated in a different context. These findings were replicated in Experiment 2 under a different presentation background manipulation. Both experiments seem to be most consistent with a model that combines the contextual variability and the study-phase retrieval mechanism to account for the spacing effect in free-recall tasks.

[1]  Robert L. Greene,et al.  Spacing effects in memory: evidence for a two-process account , 1989 .

[2]  Revising current two-process accounts of spacing effects in memory. , 1998 .

[3]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: on land and underwater. , 1975 .

[4]  William A. Johnston,et al.  The contributions of encoding effort and variability to the spacing effect on free recall. , 1976 .

[5]  S. Madigan,et al.  Intraserial repetition and coding processes in free recall , 1969 .

[6]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition , 1979, Memory & cognition.

[7]  A. W. Melton.  Repetition and retrieval from memory. , 1967, Science.

[8]  Colleen M. Kelley,et al.  A contextual change account of the directed forgetting effect. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Riccardo Russo,et al.  Spacing effects in cued-memory tasks for unfamiliar faces and nonwords , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[10]  D. L. Hintzman,et al.  Spacing judgments as an index of study-phase retrieval. , 1975 .

[11]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Environmental context and human memory , 1978 .

[12]  John A. Glover,et al.  Massed versus distributed repeated reading: A case of forgetting helping recall? , 1990 .

[13]  R. L. Solso.  Theories in cognitive psychology : the Loyola symposium , 1975 .

[14]  A. W. Melton.  The situation with respect to the spacing of repetitions and memory , 1970 .

[15]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. , 1973 .

[17]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  MEMORY FOR THE SPACING OF REPETITIONS , 1973 .

[18]  R. G. Crowder.  Principles of learning and memory , 1977 .

[19]  Riccardo Russo,et al.  Toward a unified account of spacing effects in explicit cued-memory tasks. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  E. Tulving.  Elements of episodic memory , 1983 .

[21]  Benton J. Underwood,et al.  Some correlates of item repetition in free-recall learning , 1969 .

[22]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  SAM: A theory of probabilistic search in associative memory. , 1980 .

[23]  P. R. D’Agostino,et al.  Effects of repetition as a function of study-phase retrieval , 1976 .

[24]  W. Kintsch.  Learning, memory, and conceptual processes , 1970 .

[25]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Search of associative memory. , 1981 .

[26]  Robert L. Greene,et al.  Spacing effects on implicit memory tests. , 1990 .

[27]  K. Malmberg,et al.  Context-dependent recognition memory: the ICE theory. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers,et al.  Spacing and repetition effects in human memory: application of the SAM model , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Theoretical implications of the spacing effect. , 1974 .

[30]  T. Toppino,et al.  The spacing effect in the free recall of homogeneous lists: Present and accounted for , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[31]  D. L. Hintzman.  Repetition and Memory1 , 1976 .

[32]  F. N. Dempster,et al.  Distributing and Managing the Conditions of Encoding and Practice , 1996 .

[33]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[34]  L. E. Bourne,et al.  Surface form and the spacing effect , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Bradford H. Challis,et al.  Spacing effects on cued-memory tests depend on level of processing. , 1993 .

[36]  Riccardo Russo,et al.  Spacing effects in recognition memory: When meaning matters , 2002 .

[37]  D C Rubin,et al.  The spacing effect depends on an encoding deficit, retrieval, and time in working memory: evidence from once-presented words. , 1998, Memory.

[38]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Test differences in accessing bilingual memory , 1987 .

[39]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  The spacing effect, free recall, and two-process theory: a closer look. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  A. Stillwell,et al.  Effects of encoding variability and spacing on frequency discrimination , 1995 .