Linear Parameter Varying Representation of a class of MIMO Nonlinear Systems

Linear parameter-varying (LPV) models form a powerful model class to analyze and control a (nonlinear) system of interest. Identifying an LPV model of a nonlinear system can be challenging due to the difficulty of selecting the scheduling variable(s) a priori, especially if a first principles based understanding of the system is unavailable. Converting a nonlinear model to an LPV form is also non-trivial and requires systematic methods to automate the process. Inspired by these challenges, a systematic LPV embedding approach starting from multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) linear fractional representations with a nonlinear feedback block (NLFR) is proposed. This NLFR model class is embedded into the LPV model class by an automated factorization of the (possibly MIMO) static nonlinear block present in the model. As a result of the factorization, an LPV-LFR or an LPV state-space model with affine dependency on the scheduling is obtained. This approach facilitates the selection of the scheduling variable and the connected mapping of system variables. Such a conversion method enables to use nonlinear identification tools to estimate LPV models. The potential of the proposed approach is illustrated on a 2-DOF nonlinear mass-spring-damper example.

[1]  Roland Tóth,et al.  From Nonlinear Identification to Linear Parameter Varying Models: Benchmark Examples , 2018, ArXiv.

[2]  Carlo Novara,et al.  Parametric identification of structured nonlinear systems , 2011, Autom..

[3]  R. Tóth,et al.  Embedding of Nonlinear Systems in a Linear Parameter-Varying Representation , 2014 .

[4]  Gerd Vandersteen,et al.  Measurement and identification of nonlinear systems consisting of linear dynamic blocks and one static nonlinearity , 1999, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[5]  Laurent Vanbeylen,et al.  Nonlinear LFR Block-Oriented Model: Potential Benefits and Improved, User-Friendly Identification Method , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[6]  J. R. Trapero,et al.  Recursive Estimation and Time-Series Analysis. An Introduction for the Student and Practitioner, Second edition, Peter C. Young. Springer (2011), 504 pp., Hardcover, $119.00, ISBN: 978-3-642-21980-1 , 2015 .

[7]  E. Bai,et al.  Block Oriented Nonlinear System Identification , 2010 .

[8]  Tyrone L. Vincent,et al.  Identification of Structured Nonlinear Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[9]  L. Chisci,et al.  Gain‐scheduling MPC of nonlinear systems , 2003 .

[10]  Hms Hossam Abbas,et al.  An improved robust model predictive control for linear parameter‐varying input‐output models , 2018 .

[11]  Carlo Novara,et al.  Linear Parameter-Varying System Identification: New Developments and Trends , 2011 .

[12]  José A. De Doná,et al.  Fault estimation and controller compensation in Lure systems by LPV-embedding , 2019, Int. J. Control.

[13]  Javad Mohammadpour,et al.  Control of linear parameter varying systems with applications , 2012 .

[14]  Koen Tiels,et al.  Identification of block-oriented nonlinear systems starting from linear approximations: A survey , 2016, Autom..

[15]  Yves Rolain,et al.  Parametric identification of parallel Wiener-Hammerstein systems , 2017, Autom..

[16]  José A. De Doná,et al.  On robust stability and set invariance of switched linear parameter varying systems , 2015, Int. J. Control.

[17]  Roland Toth,et al.  Modeling and Identification of Linear Parameter-Varying Systems , 2010 .

[18]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix Computations, Third Edition , 1996 .

[19]  Roland Tóth,et al.  LPV system identification under noise corrupted scheduling and output signal observations , 2015, Autom..