A model for dictyostelium slug movement

Dictyostelium slug movement results from the coordinated movement of its 10(5)constituent cells. We have shown experimentally that cells in the tip of the slug show a rotational cell movement while the cells in the back of the slug move periodically forward (Siegert & Weijer, 1992). We have put forward the hypothesis that cell movement in slugs is controlled by chemotaxis to scroll waves generated in the tip which convert to twisted scroll or planar waves in the back of the slug (Bretschneider et al., 1995). The coordinated movement of all individual cells in response to these waves could then result in forward movement of the slug. We now test this hypothesis by extending our model for mound formation (Bretschneider et al., 1997) to include two cell types with different signalling and movement properties. All cells are able to relay cAMP and move chemotactically in response to cAMP gradients. Cells interact by adhesion, pressure and friction with neighbouring cells and the extracellular matrix. The model can generate stable scroll waves propagating from the tip to the back of a slug which coordinate forward cell movement and result in slug migration. We use the model to investigate the influence of cell type specific differences in excitability, adhesion and cell interactions on slug motion. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

[1]  R. Kamboj,et al.  Cell-cell adhesion and morphogenesis in Dictyostelium discoideum. , 1990, Developmental genetics.

[2]  M. Caterina,et al.  Molecular insights into eukaryotic chemotaxis , 1991, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[3]  R. Kay,et al.  Combinatorial control of cell differentiation by cAMP and DIF-1 during development of Dictyostelium discoideum. , 1990, Development.

[4]  J. Williams,et al.  An analysis of culmination in Dictyostelium using prestalk and stalk-specific cell autonomous markers. , 1991, Development.

[5]  D R Soll,et al.  Behavior of Dictyostelium amoebae is regulated primarily by the temporal dynamic of the natural cAMP wave. , 1992, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[6]  A Goldbeter,et al.  A Model Based on Receptor Desensitization for Cyclic AMP Signaling in Dictyostelium Cells. , 1987, Biophysical journal.

[7]  J. Tyson Cyclic-AMP waves in Dictyostelium: Specific models and general theories , 1989 .

[8]  R. Firtel Signal transduction pathways controlling multicellular development in Dictyostelium. , 1991, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[9]  Bretschneider,et al.  A Model for Cell Movement During Dictyostelium Mound Formation , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  Florian Siegert,et al.  Spiral and concentric waves organize multicellular Dictyostelium mounds , 1995, Current Biology.

[11]  F. Siegert,et al.  A gradient method for the quantitative analysis of cell movement and tissue flow and its application to the analysis of multicellular Dictyostelium development. , 1994, Journal of cell science.

[12]  J. Williams,et al.  A new anatomy of the prestalk zone in Dictyostelium , 1989, Nature.

[13]  K. Yabuno CHANGES IN CELLULAR ADHESIVENESS DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SLIME MOLD DICTYOSTELIUM DISCOIDEUM * , 1971, Development, growth & differentiation.

[14]  Florian Siegert,et al.  Patterns of cell movement within the Dictyostelium slug revealed by cell type-specific, surface labeling of living cells , 1994, Cell.

[15]  J. Williams,et al.  Disruption of the gene encoding the EcmA, extracellular matrix protein of Dictyostelium alters slug morphology. , 1994, Developmental Biology.

[16]  C J Weijer,et al.  Three-dimensional scroll waves organize Dictyostelium slugs. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  F. Siegert,et al.  Analysis of optical density wave propagation and cell movement in the cellular slime mould Dictyostelium discoideum , 1991 .

[18]  F. Siegert,et al.  Three-dimensional scroll waves of cAMP could direct cell movement and gene expression in Dictyostelium slugs. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  P. Fisher,et al.  Photosensory and thermosensory responses in Dictyostelium slugs are specifically impaired by absence of the F-actin cross-linking gelation factor (ABP-120) , 1997, Current Biology.

[20]  P. Devreotes Dictyostelium discoideum: a model system for cell-cell interactions in development. , 1989, Science.

[21]  Florian Siegert,et al.  A Hydrodynamic model forDictyostelium discoideumMound Formation , 1997 .

[22]  U. Dohrmann,et al.  Signal processing in Dictyostelium discoideum slugs , 1984 .

[23]  C J Weijer,et al.  Three-dimensional waves of excitation during Dictyostelium morphogenesis. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  P. Hogeweg,et al.  Modelling Morphogenesis: From Single Cells to Crawling Slugs. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  G. Gerisch,et al.  Oscillations of cyclic nucleotide concentrations in relation to the excitability of Dictyostelium cells. , 1979, The Journal of experimental biology.

[26]  F. Siegert,et al.  Analysis of optical density wave propagation and cell movement during mound formation in Dictyostelium discoideum. , 1996, Developmental biology.

[27]  G. Gerisch Cyclic AMP and other signals controlling cell development and differentiation in Dictyostelium. , 1987, Annual review of biochemistry.

[28]  F. Siegert,et al.  Twisted scroll waves organize Dictyostelium mucoroides slugs. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[29]  J. Sternfeld Evidence for differential cellular adhesion as the mechanism of sorting-out of various cellular slime mold species. , 1979, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[30]  John J. Tyson,et al.  Spiral waves of cyclic amp in a model of slime mold aggregation , 1989 .

[31]  J. T. Bonner,et al.  How the Dictyostelium Discoideum Grex Crawls , 1986 .