Antibiotic potential of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) against Sclerotium rolfsii

High performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) analysis of culture filtrates of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and medium of inhibitory zone of interaction of Sclerotium rolfsii with PGPR, viz. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas fluorescens 4, Pseudomonas fluorescens 4 (new) and Pseudomonas sp. varied from sample to sample. In all the culture filtrates of PGPRs, P. aeruginosa had nine phenolic acids in which ferulic acid (14.52 μg/ml) was maximum followed by other phenolic acids. However, the culture filtrates of P. fluorescens 4 had six phenolic acids with maximum ferulic acid (20.54 μg/ml) followed by indole acetic acid (IAA), caffeic, salicylic, o-coumeric acid and cinnamic acids. However, P. fluorescens 4 culture filtrate had seven phenolic acids in which salicylic acid was maximum (18.03 μg) followed by IAA, caffeic, vanillic, ferulic, o-coumeric and cinnamic acids. Pseudomonas sp. also showed eight phenolic acids where caffeic acid (2.75 μg) was maximum followed by trace amounts of ferulic, salicylic, IAA, vanillic, cinnamic, o-coumeric and tannic acids. The analysis of antibiosis zone of PGPRs showed fairly rich phenolic acids. A total of nine phenolic acids were detected in which caffeic acid was maximum (29.14 μg/g) followed by gallic (17.64 μg/g) and vanillic (3.52 μg/g) acids but others were in traces. In P. aeruginosa, antibiosis zone had seven phenolic acids where IAA was maximum (3.48 μg/g) followed by o-coumeric acid (2.08 μg/g), others were in traces. The medium of antibiosis zone of P. fluorescens 4 and P. fluorescens 4 new had eight phenolic acids in which IAA was maximum with other phenolic acids in traces.

[1]  R. R. Rakh,et al.  Biological Control of Sclerotium rolfsii, Causing Stem Rot of Groundnut by Pseudomonas cf. monteilii 9 , 2011 .

[2]  J. Andrés,et al.  Pseudomonas aurantiaca SR1: Plant Growth Promoting Traits, Secondary Metabolites and Crop Inoculation Response , 2008 .

[3]  D. Singh,et al.  Phenolic compounds of Sorghum vulgare in response to Sclerotium rolfsii infection , 2007 .

[4]  C. Nautiyal,et al.  Biocontrol of Collar Rot Disease of Betelvine (Piper betle L.) Caused by Sclerotium rolfsii by Using Rhizosphere-Competent Pseudomonas fluorescens NBRI-N6 and P. fluorescens NBRI-N , 2003, Current Microbiology.

[5]  B. Sarma,et al.  Ferulic acid may prevent infection of Cicer arietinum by Sclerotium rolfsii , 2003 .

[6]  D. Singh,et al.  Effect of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria and Culture Filtrate of Sclerotium rolfsii on Phenolic and Salicylic Acid Contents in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) , 2003, Current Microbiology.

[7]  S. M. Mehta,et al.  Plant Growth‐Promoting Rhizobacteria‐Elicited Alterations in Phenolic Profile of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) Infected by Sclerotium rolfsii , 2002 .

[8]  K. Singh,et al.  Control of powdery mildew (Erysiphe pisi) of pea (Pisum sativum) by combined application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and Neemazal , 2000 .

[9]  J. Kuc Phytoalexins, stress metabolism, and disease resistance in plants. , 1995, Annual review of phytopathology.

[10]  R. Hammerschmidt,et al.  Phenolic Compounds and Their Role in Disease Resistance , 1992 .

[11]  R. Peer,et al.  Induced resistance and phytoalexin accumulation in biological control of Fusarium wilt of carnation by Pseudomonas sp. strain WCS417r , 1991 .