DEVELOPING ENGAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN THE BLENDED LEARNING TRIANGLE: THE CASE OF I&E EDUCATION IN THE EIT DIGITAL

Digitalised education is already a consolidated practice in Higher Education. Budget constraints and the need to target larger students cohorts show the benefit of leveraging educational content without increasing delivery costs. However, if on the one hand this “economy of scale” based rationale is the main foundation of the digitalised education narrative, on the other, such a view clashes with the need to address a series of novel social dynamics which are enacted by technological mediation. This claim is rooted in a change of focus from just economies of scale to that of scope. When knowledge sources are diverse, fast-changing and interconnected, Blended Learning (BL) offers an opportunity to provide learners with a wide mix of contents which can be hardly owned by a single knowledge provider. However, in BL, the online part tends to drive its main value proposition, which turns out to be based on an efficiency-based view. On the other hand, positioning ICT as a means to produce complex educational content delivered to students interactively by trainers, transforms the traditional learner/trainer relationship into a three-dimensional learning environment made of content producers (CPs), class trainers (CTs) and learners (CLs), here referred to as the Blended Learning Triangle (BLT). In this contribution we claim that these actors are traditionally seen as, somehow, disjoint. The question is whether such an interactional independence can be effective when dealing with complex knowledges instead of requiring a deeper engagement between them. This implies a problematization of the BLT, whereby these actors need to interact, cooperate and, plausibly, handle conflicts over demands of flexibility, adaptability and knowledge absorption capacity. This paper explores issues related to this problematization and, relying on experiences developed in the context of the EIT Digital, a pan-european network of HEIs, suggests possible recommendations to address these novel interactional demands.

[1]  Raven Wallace,et al.  Online Learning in Higher Education: a review of research on interactions among teachers and students , 2003 .

[2]  Thomas Schildhauer,et al.  Video and Online Learning: Critical Reflections and Findings from the Field , 2015 .

[3]  Paul Nightingale,et al.  الهدم الخلاق Creative Destruction , 2014 .

[4]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs , 2005 .

[5]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disrupting College: How Disruptive Innovation Can Deliver Quality and Affordability to Postsecondary Education. , 2011 .

[6]  David Morris,et al.  Economies of scale and scope in e‐learning , 2008 .

[7]  J. Tagg,et al.  From Teaching to Learning — A New Paradigm For Undergraduate Education , 1995 .

[8]  Philip J. Guo,et al.  How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos , 2014, L@S.

[9]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[10]  Alphonsius Menkefor Disruptive innovation. , 2013, Nursing economic$.

[11]  Penny Ralston-Berg,et al.  Faculty Development for E-Learning: A Multi-Campus Community of Practice (COP) Approach , 2012 .

[12]  Philip Haynes,et al.  Online learning and teaching in higher education , 2006 .

[13]  Tuncay Yigit,et al.  Evaluation of Blended Learning Approach in Computer Engineering Education , 2014 .

[14]  Vladimir Uskov Student-centered learning in online and blended education on computer information systems , 2003, 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003..

[15]  Elizabeth Stacey,et al.  Online interaction impacts on learning: teaching the teachers to teach online , 2004 .

[16]  Florence Martin,et al.  Using Virtual Classrooms: Student Perceptions of Features and Characteristics in an Online and a Blended Course , 2010 .

[17]  G. Kirkup,et al.  Information and communications technologies (ICT) in higher education teaching—a tale of gradualism rather than revolution , 2005 .

[18]  D. Garrison,et al.  Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[19]  Deborah DeZure Learning from "Change." Landmarks in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education from "Change" Magazine, 1969-1999. , 2000 .

[20]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[21]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Priciples and Guidlines , 2007 .