A Direct Comparison of N400 Effects of Predictability and Incongruity in Adjective-Noun Combination

Previous work has shown that the N400 ERP component is elicited by all words, whether presented in isolation or in structured contexts, and that its amplitude is modulated by semantic association and contextual predictability. What is less clear is the extent to which the N400 response is modulated by semantic incongruity when predictability is held constant. In the current study we examine N400 modulation associated with independent manipulations of predictability and congruity in an adjective-noun paradigm that allows us to precisely control predictability through corpus counts. Our results demonstrate small N400 effects of semantic congruity (yellow bag vs. innocent bag), and much more robust N400 effects of predictability (runny nose vs. dainty nose) under the same conditions. These data argue against unitary N400 theories according to which N400 effects of both predictability and incongruity reflect a common process such as degree of integration difficulty, as large N400 effects of predictability were observed in the absence of large N400 effects of incongruity. However, the data are consistent with some versions of unitary ‘facilitated access’ N400 theories, as well as multiple-generator accounts according to which the N400 can be independently modulated by facilitated conceptual/lexical access (as with predictability) and integration difficulty (as with incongruity, perhaps to a greater extent in full sentential contexts).

[1]  John C J Hoeks,et al.  Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  M. Kutas,et al.  Psycholinguistics Electrified II (1994–2005) , 2006 .

[3]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Semantic Integration in Sentences and Discourse: Evidence from the N400 , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  C. Phillips,et al.  No semantic illusions in the “Semantic P600” phenomenon: ERP evidence from Mandarin Chinese , 2013, Brain Research.

[6]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of interaction between contextual expectation and semantic integration during the processing of collocations , 2010, Biological Psychology.

[7]  Katherine A. DeLong,et al.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[9]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Distinct time courses of word and context comprehension in the left temporal cortex. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  L. Aravind,et al.  Integration of Word Meaning and World Knowledge in Language Comprehension , 2022 .

[11]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .

[12]  Ting Qian,et al.  Rapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic Comprehension , 2013, PloS one.

[13]  Karin Humphreys,et al.  The psychology of language : from data to theory , 2001 .

[14]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400 , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Liina Pylkkänen,et al.  Simple Composition: A Magnetoencephalography Investigation into the Comprehension of Minimal Linguistic Phrases , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Alec Marantz,et al.  Lexical Preactivation in Basic Linguistic Phrases , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  MUC (Memory, Unification, Control) and beyond , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[18]  L. Pylkkänen,et al.  Semantics vs. world knowledge in prefrontal cortex , 2009 .

[19]  M. Rugg Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high-and low-frequency words , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  M. Kutas,et al.  Interactions between sentence context and word frequencyinevent-related brainpotentials , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[22]  Salim Roukos,et al.  Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification. , 1983, Psychophysiology.

[23]  J. Ward,et al.  The Student's Guide to Cognitive Neuroscience , 2006 .

[24]  P. Hagoort,et al.  The Processing Nature of the N 400 : Evidence fiom Masked Priming , 2007 .

[25]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[26]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Interplay between computational models and cognitive electrophysiology in visual word recognition , 2007, Brain Research Reviews.

[27]  H. Schriefers,et al.  Prediction in language comprehension beyond specific words: An ERP study on sentence comprehension in Polish , 2013 .

[28]  Neil Cohn,et al.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Complement Coercion , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  When the Truth Is Not Too Hard to Handle , 2008, Psychological science.

[30]  P. Tibbetts :Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind , 2009 .

[31]  John Hoeks,et al.  Electrophysiological Research on Conversation and Discourse Processing , 2014 .

[32]  C. Büchel,et al.  Event-Related fMRI Reveals Cortical Sites Involved in Contextual Sentence Integration , 2002, NeuroImage.

[33]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[34]  Clare Margaret Anne Stroud,et al.  Structural and semantic selectivity in the electrophysiology of sentence comprehension , 2008 .

[35]  M. Traxler,et al.  Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: Prediction takes precedence , 2015, Cognition.

[36]  Bruce L. Miller,et al.  What Role Does the Anterior Temporal Lobe Play in Sentence-level Processing? Neural Correlates of Syntactic Processing in Semantic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Word surprisal predicts N400 amplitude during reading , 2013, ACL.

[38]  Van Berkum,et al.  The neuropragmatics of 'simple' utterance comprehension: An ERP review , 2009 .

[39]  J. Grainger,et al.  An Electrophysiological Study of the Effects of Orthographic Neighborhood Size on Printed Word Perception , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  Nathaniel J. Smith,et al.  The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic , 2013, Cognition.

[41]  André Longtin,et al.  Invited talk: Coding strategies for multiscale sensory signals , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[42]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[43]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood: An Event-Related Potential Study of Lexical Relationships and Prediction in Context. , 2009, Journal of memory and language.

[44]  Roger Levy,et al.  Cloze but no cigar: The complex relationship between cloze, corpus, and subjective probabilities in language processing , 2011, CogSci.

[45]  Hartmut Fitz,et al.  Getting real about Semantic Illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension , 2012, Brain Research.

[46]  P. Hagoort The fractionation of spoken language understanding by measuring electrical and magnetic brain signals , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  H. Kolk,et al.  Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials , 2003, Brain and Language.

[48]  C. Van Petten,et al.  Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[49]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  Dissociating N400 Effects of Prediction from Association in Single-word Contexts , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  H. Neville,et al.  Natural speech processing: An analysis using event-related brain potentials , 1991, Psychobiology.

[51]  P. Gordon,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Reversed Lexical Repetition Effects in Language Processing , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  Francesco Vespignani,et al.  Predictive Mechanisms in Idiom Comprehension , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  M. Kutas,et al.  Anticipating Words and Their Gender: An Event-related Brain Potential Study of Semantic Integration, Gender Expectancy, and Gender Agreement in Spanish Sentence Reading , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing , 1999 .

[55]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[56]  Colin Phillips,et al.  A “bag-of-arguments” mechanism for initial verb predictions , 2016 .

[57]  P. Gordon,et al.  Coreference and lexical repetition: Mechanisms of discourse integration , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[58]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.

[59]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[60]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[61]  Giosuè Baggio,et al.  The balance between memory and unification in semantics: A dynamic account of the N400 , 2011 .

[62]  L. Barsalou Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[63]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  When Peanuts Fall in Love: N400 Evidence for the Power of Discourse , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[64]  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia,et al.  Semantic combinatorial processing of non-anomalous expressions , 2012, NeuroImage.

[65]  C. Petten,et al.  Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies , 2006, Brain and Language.

[66]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[67]  L. Pylkkänen,et al.  Basic linguistic composition recruits the left anterior temporal lobe and left angular gyrus during both listening and reading. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[68]  Giosuè Baggio,et al.  Coercion and Compositionality , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[69]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The Processing Nature of the N400: Evidence from Masked Priming , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[70]  Katherine A. DeLong,et al.  Predictability, plausibility, and two late ERP positivities during written sentence comprehension , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[71]  Wilson L. Taylor,et al.  “Cloze Procedure”: A New Tool for Measuring Readability , 1953 .

[72]  L. Osterhout,et al.  The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2005 .

[73]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  To Predict or Not to Predict: Influences of Task and Strategy on the Processing of Semantic Relations , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.