Collective Climates: A Test of Their Sociopsychological Significance

This paper contributes to the debate in the literature on organizational climate concerning the conceptual and empirical meaning of aggregation of the perceptions of individuals. Use of the mean has been criticised because it cloaks the wide variations in perceptions that surround it. A recent move to demonstrate the existence of groups of people who do see climate in a similar way has used clustering techniques to identify such "collectives". Payne (1990) questioned the validity of this approach on the grounds that such collectives may not represent meaningful socio-psychological groups. The present paper is based on the view that meaningful collectives are most likely to emerge when people work together on common tasks and in relatively confined physical spaces. Despite finding an organization where such conditions exist the clustering technique largely fails to identify meaningful social collectives. The implications of these findings are discussed.

[1]  E. F. Adams.  An investigation of the influence of job level and functional specialty on job attitudes and perceptions. , 1977 .

[2]  William H. Glick,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring Organizational and Psychological Climate: Pitfalls in Multilevel Research , 1985 .

[3]  J. E. Newman,et al.  Understanding the organizational structure — Job attitude relationship through perceptions of the work environment , 1975 .

[4]  Arnon E. Reichers,et al.  On the Etiology of Climates. , 1983 .

[5]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[6]  R. Payne,et al.  G. G. stern's organizational climate index: A reconceptualization and application to business organizations , 1971 .

[7]  D. Wishart.  Clustan : user manual , 1978 .

[8]  Lawrence R. James,et al.  Confirmatory Analytic Tests of Three Causal Models Relating Job Perceptions to Job Satisfaction. , 1986 .

[9]  H. Blumer,et al.  Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method , 1988 .

[10]  Roy Payne,et al.  Organizational climate and job satisfaction: a conceptual synthesis , 1976 .

[11]  D. C. Howell.  Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[12]  Lawrence R. James,et al.  PERCEIVED JOB CHARACTERISTICS AND JOB SATISFACTION: AN EXAMINATION OF RECIPROCAL CAUSATION , 1980 .

[13]  R. Payne,et al.  Madness in our method. A comment on Jackofsky and Slocum's paper, ‘A longitudinal study of climates’ , 1990 .

[14]  R. Guion.  A note on organizational climate , 1973 .

[15]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  Climate Formation: Issues and Extensions , 1985 .

[16]  J. Slocum,et al.  A longitudinal study of climates , 1988 .

[17]  Eugene F. Stone,et al.  Job Characteristics and Job Attitudes: A Multivariate Study. , 1975 .

[18]  William H. Glick,et al.  Response: Organizations Are Not Central Tendencies: Shadowboxing in the Dark, Round 2 , 1988 .

[19]  L. James.  Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement. , 1982 .

[20]  B. Schneider,et al.  Employee and customer perceptions of service in banks: Replication and extension. , 1985 .

[21]  Lawrence R. James,et al.  Comment: Organizations Do Not Cognize , 1988 .

[22]  Diana C. Pheysey,et al.  Influence of Structure at Organizational and Group Levels. , 1971 .

[23]  R. Payne,et al.  Organizational structure and climate , 1976 .

[24]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  The construction of climate in organizational research. , 1988 .

[25]  Neal Schmitt,et al.  Configurations of Organizational Effectiveness and Efficiency , 1993 .

[26]  Robert D. Pritchard,et al.  The effects of organizational climate on managerial job performance and job satisfaction , 1973 .

[27]  J. Slocum,et al.  Collective climate: Agreement as a basis for defining aggregate climates in organizations. , 1984 .

[28]  J. Slocum,et al.  Rejoinder to Payne's comment on ‘A longitudinal study of climates’ , 1990 .

[29]  John A. Drexler,et al.  Organizational Climate: Its Homogeneity Within Organizations. , 1977 .