MicroCT for molecular imaging: Quantitative visualization of complete three‐dimensional distributions of gene products in embryonic limbs

We present a broadly applicable procedure for whole‐mount imaging of antibody probes in embryonic tissues at microscopic resolutions based on combining a metal‐based immunodetection scheme with x‐ray microtomography (microCT). The method is generally accessible, relying on standard enzyme‐conjugated secondary antibodies and other readily available reagents, and is demonstrated here with microCT visualizations of acetylated α‐tubulin in the chick nervous system and of type II collagen in developing limbs. The tomographic images offer complete three‐dimensional representations of molecular patterns obtained with immunostaining methods at the level of organ development, with added possibilities to quantify both spatial distributions and varying densities of gene products in situ. This imaging modality bridges a crucial gap in three‐dimensional molecular imaging by combining the histological resolutions of confocal microscopy with a greater specimen size range than optical projection tomography, and thus enables a powerful new approach to long‐standing issues of skeletogenic pattern formation in vertebrate limbs. Developmental Dynamics 240:2301–2308, 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  James Sharpe,et al.  Imaging in developmental biology : a laboratory manual , 2011 .

[2]  B. Metscher MicroCT for developmental biology: A versatile tool for high‐contrast 3D imaging at histological resolutions , 2009, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[3]  Timothy B. Rowe,et al.  Fossil Evidence on Origin of the Mammalian Brain , 2011, Science.

[4]  Viktor Hamburger,et al.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo , 1992, Journal of morphology.

[5]  W. Weninger,et al.  Visualizing Vertebrate Embryos with Episcopic 3D Imaging Techniques , 2009, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[6]  E. Puelles,et al.  Dynamic expression patterns of Nkx6.1 and Nkx6.2 in the developing mes‐diencephalic basal plate , 2010, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[7]  James Sharpe,et al.  Tomographic molecular imaging and 3D quantification within adult mouse organs , 2007, Nature Methods.

[8]  K. Schughart,et al.  Computer-based three-dimensional visualization of developmental gene expression , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[9]  Stuart A. Newman,et al.  Bare Bones Pattern Formation: A Core Regulatory Network in Varying Geometries Reproduces Major Features of Vertebrate Limb Development and Evolution , 2010, PloS one.

[10]  J. Hecksher-Sørensen,et al.  Optical Projection Tomography as a Tool for 3D Microscopy and Gene Expression Studies , 2002, Science.

[11]  D. Duboule,et al.  The origin of digits: expression patterns versus regulatory mechanisms. , 2010, Developmental cell.

[12]  James Sharpe,et al.  The Role of Spatially Controlled Cell Proliferation in Limb Bud Morphogenesis , 2010, PLoS biology.

[13]  Xavier Montet,et al.  Molecular imaging by micro-CT: specific E-selectin imaging , 2009, European Radiology.

[14]  T. Linsenmayer,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies to connective tissue macromolecules: type II collagen. , 1980, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[15]  A. Wanninger The application of confocal microscopy and 3 D imaging software in Functional , Evolutionary , and Developmental Zoology : reconstructing myo-and neurogenesis in space and time , 2007 .

[16]  C. Tickle,et al.  3D expression patterns of cell cycle genes in the developing chick wing and comparison with expression patterns of genes implicated in digit specification , 2011, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[17]  Erika Kristensen,et al.  Phenotypic variability and craniofacial dysmorphology: increased shape variance in a mouse model for cleft lip , 2008, Journal of anatomy.

[18]  Y. Sasazaki,et al.  Rapid 3-Dimensional Imaging of Embryonic Craniofacial Morphology Using Microscopic Computed Tomography , 2008, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[19]  J. Pawley,et al.  Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy , 1990, Springer US.

[20]  J F Hainfeld,et al.  Micro-CT enables microlocalisation and quantification of Her2-targeted gold nanoparticles within tumour regions. , 2011, The British journal of radiology.

[21]  C. Tickle,et al.  Comparative Analysis of 3D Expression Patterns of Transcription Factor Genes and Digit Fate Maps in the Developing Chick Wing , 2011, PloS one.

[22]  V. Hamburger,et al.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. 1951. , 2012, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[23]  B. Hallgrímsson,et al.  Epigenetic interactions and the structure of phenotypic variation in the cranium , 2007, Evolution & development.

[24]  Philipp Mitteroecker,et al.  The Developmental Basis of Variational Modularity: Insights from Quantitative Genetics, Morphometrics, and Developmental Biology , 2009, Evolutionary Biology.

[25]  Three-dimensional confocal microscopy of the mammalian inner ear , 2010 .

[26]  Willi A. Kalender,et al.  Computed tomography : fundamentals, system technology, image quality, applications , 2000 .

[27]  T. Grogan,et al.  High-Resolution Immunophenotyping of Subcellular Compartments in Tissue Microarrays by Enzyme Metallography , 2005, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[28]  J. Sharpe Optical projection tomography. , 2004, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[29]  S. Yamada,et al.  Developmental atlas of the early first trimester human embryo , 2010, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[30]  G. Wagner,et al.  Why ontogenetic homology criteria can be misleading: lessons from digit identity transformations. , 2011, Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution.

[31]  G. Wagner,et al.  Pentadactyl ground state of the avian wing. , 2002, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[32]  Isaac Salazar-Ciudad,et al.  A computational model of teeth and the developmental origins of morphological variation , 2010, Nature.

[33]  Benedikt Hallgrímsson,et al.  Modularity in the skull and cranial vasculature of laboratory mice: implications for the evolution of complex phenotypes , 2011, Evolution & development.

[34]  R. Zeller,et al.  Vertebrate limb bud development: moving towards integrative analysis of organogenesis , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[35]  Yong-Tao Zhang,et al.  Multiscale models for vertebrate limb development. , 2008, Current topics in developmental biology.

[36]  K. Tamura,et al.  Embryological Evidence Identifies Wing Digits in Birds as Digits 1, 2, and 3 , 2011, Science.

[37]  J. Epstein,et al.  Rapid 3D Phenotyping of Cardiovascular Development in Mouse Embryos by Micro-CT With Iodine Staining , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[38]  G. Müller Evo–devo: extending the evolutionary synthesis , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[39]  B. Metscher MicroCT for comparative morphology: simple staining methods allow high-contrast 3D imaging of diverse non-mineralized animal tissues , 2009, BMC Physiology.