Airspace Phase Transitions and the Traffic Physics of Interacting 4D Trajectories

This paper presents early progress in the development of a modeling and simulation capability derived from advancements in complexity science coupled with advancements in computational platforms for the simulation and analysis of emergent phenomena in the airspace. We present a research effort to test concepts of collective dynamics of large numbers of heterogeneous aircraft (thousands to tens of thousands) in the NAS undergoing continuous 4D trajectory replanning in the presence of noise and uncertainty while optimizing performance measures and deconflicting trajectories. We use a combination of modified genetic algorithms and pseudopotential methods acting on extended objects (trajectories) rather than on aircraft themselves to implement this capability. This is a natural way to preserve intent while deconflicting aircraft. Subjects under investigation include measures of fullness of the airspace, emergent structures arising from interacting trajectory optimization, tradeoffs between centralized and distributed optimization, and phase transitions in collective behavior ("traffic physics"). Our work is concentrated in the enroute airspace, but can in principle be extended to the terminal airspace. We describe the combined software and hardware platform we have built to realize a rapid-prototyping environment capable of investigating these questions at a realistic level of fidelity and in much greater than real time speed. Our simulation platform is built on the principle of minimum assumption and maximum emergence. There are no sectors, no flight level constraints, and control actions can be arbitrarily subtle and continuous in all four dimensions. Constraints up to and including the current NAS configuration can be "switched on" for comparison purposes. With this software simulation system, we can address implications for centralized versus decentralized control in a real-world system and explore alternative TBO concepts of operation, including applications such as game theory for economic considerations, bulk management of airspace phase state for capacity considerations, and well as policy and technology strategy evaluations.

[1]  Marc Mézard,et al.  Landscape of solutions in constraint satisfaction problems , 2005, Physical review letters.

[2]  S Kirkpatrick,et al.  Critical Behavior in the Satisfiability of Random Boolean Expressions , 1994, Science.

[3]  M. Mézard,et al.  Analytic and Algorithmic Solution of Random Satisfiability Problems , 2002, Science.

[4]  Robert A. Vivona,et al.  Operational Concept for Collaborative Traffic Flow Management based on Field Observations , 2005 .

[5]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[6]  T. Nagatani The physics of traffic jams , 2002 .

[7]  Yu-Heng Chang,et al.  Air Traffic Flow Management in the Presence of Uncertainty , 2009 .

[8]  D. Helbing Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems , 2000, cond-mat/0012229.

[9]  M. Mongeau,et al.  A new method for generating optimal conflict free 4D trajectory , 2010 .

[10]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[11]  Jean-Claude Latombe,et al.  Motion planning in the presence of moving obstacles , 1992 .

[12]  Jonathan Histon,et al.  Air traffic complexity based on non linear dynamical systems , 2003 .

[13]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Micro- and macro-simulation of freeway traffic , 2002 .

[14]  Matt R. Jardin Real-Time Conflict-Free Trajectory Optimization , 2003 .

[15]  W ReynoldsCraig Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model , 1987 .

[16]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[17]  Shu-Fan Wu,et al.  GA-based on-line real-time optimization of commercial aircraft's flight path for a free flight strategy , 2001 .

[18]  Daniel Delahaye,et al.  Distributed Trajectory Flexibility Preservation for Traffic Complexity Mitigation , 2009 .

[19]  Tad Hogg,et al.  Complexity of Continuous, 3-SAT-like Constraint Satisfaction Problems , 2001 .

[20]  Mark G. Ballin,et al.  Distributed Air/Ground Traffic Management for En Route Flight Operations , 2001 .

[21]  Sam Liden Practical Considerations in Optimal Flight Management Computations , 1985, 1985 American Control Conference.

[22]  Douglas R. Isaacson,et al.  Conflict Detection and Resolution In the Presence of Prediction Error , 1997 .

[23]  Hao Xin,et al.  China. Supercomputer leaves competition--and users--in the dust. , 2010, Science.

[24]  H. Erzberger,et al.  Constrained optimum trajectories with specified range , 1980 .

[25]  Jean-Marc Alliot,et al.  OPTIMAL RESOLUTION OF EN ROUTE CONFLICTS. , 1995 .

[26]  S. Puechmorel,et al.  Air traffic complexity map based on non linear dynamical systems , 2004 .

[27]  Dimitris Bertsimas,et al.  The Air Traffic Flow Management Problem with Enroute Capacities , 1998, Oper. Res..