A rapid, sensitive, scalable method for Precision Run-On sequencing (PRO-seq)

Tracking active transcription with the nuclear run-on (NRO) assays has been instrumental in uncovering mechanisms of gene regulation. The coupling of NROs with high-throughput sequencing has facilitated the discovery of previously unannotated or undetectable RNA classes genome-wide. Precision run-on sequencing (PRO-seq) is a run-on variant that maps polymerase active sites with nucleotide or near-nucleotide resolution. One main drawback to this and many other nascent RNA detection methods is the somewhat intimidating multi-day workflow associated with creating the libraries suitable for high-throughput sequencing. Here, we present an improved PRO-seq protocol where many of the enzymatic steps are carried out while the biotinylated NRO RNA remains bound to streptavidin-coated magnetic beads. These adaptations reduce time, sample loss and RNA degradation, and we demonstrate that the resulting libraries are of the same quality as libraries generated using the original published protocol. The assay is also more sensitive which permits reproducible, high-quality libraries from 104–105 cells instead of 106–107. Altogether, the improved protocol is more tractable allows for nascent RNA profiling from small samples, such as rare samples or FACS sorted cell populations.

[1]  Erin M. Wissink,et al.  Nascent RNA analyses: tracking transcription and its regulation , 2019, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[2]  A. Siepel,et al.  Characterizing RNA stability genome-wide through combined analysis of PRO-seq and RNA-seq data , 2019, BMC Biology.

[3]  Leighton J. Core,et al.  Chromatin run-on and sequencing maps the transcriptional regulatory landscape of glioblastoma multiforme , 2018, Nature Genetics.

[4]  Lauren A. Choate,et al.  Identification of regulatory elements from nascent transcription using dREG , 2018, bioRxiv.

[5]  Michael J. Guertin,et al.  Transcriptional response to stress is pre-wired by promoter and enhancer architecture , 2017, Nature Communications.

[6]  Leighton J. Core,et al.  Base-pair-resolution genome-wide mapping of active RNA polymerases using precision nuclear run-on (PRO-seq) , 2016, Nature Protocols.

[7]  J. Gagneur,et al.  TT-seq maps the human transient transcriptome , 2016, Science.

[8]  Fabiana M. Duarte,et al.  Transcription factors GAF and HSF act at distinct regulatory steps to modulate stress-induced gene activation , 2016, bioRxiv.

[9]  Fabiana M. Duarte,et al.  Mammalian Heat Shock Response and Mechanisms Underlying Its Genome-wide Transcriptional Regulation. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[10]  Stephanie L. Hyland,et al.  Identification of active transcriptional regulatory elements with GRO-seq , 2015, Nature Methods.

[11]  André L. Martins,et al.  Analysis of nascent RNA identifies a unified architecture of initiation regions at mammalian promoters and enhancers , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[12]  J. Lis,et al.  Genome-wide dynamics of Pol II elongation and its interplay with promoter proximal pausing, chromatin, and exons , 2014, eLife.

[13]  Hojoong Kwak.  Dissection Of The Precise Mechanisms Of Rna Polymerase Ii Pausing And Elongation Using Nascent Transcript Analysis , 2013 .

[14]  Barbara J Meyer,et al.  Condensin controls recruitment of RNA polymerase II to achieve nematode X-chromosome dosage compensation , 2013, eLife.

[15]  André L. Martins,et al.  Signaling pathways differentially affect RNA polymerase II initiation, pausing, and elongation rate in cells. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[16]  Leighton J. Core,et al.  Precise Maps of RNA Polymerase Reveal How Promoters Direct Initiation and Pausing , 2013, Science.

[17]  J. Weissman,et al.  Nascent transcript sequencing visualizes transcription at nucleotide resolution , 2011, Nature.

[18]  Leighton J. Core,et al.  Nascent RNA Sequencing Reveals Widespread Pausing and Divergent Initiation at Human Promoters , 2008, Science.

[19]  J. Pérez-Ortín,et al.  Genomic run-on evaluates transcription rates for all yeast genes and identifies gene regulatory mechanisms. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[20]  G. Hager.  Methods issue on nuclear structure and chromatin. , 1999, Methods.

[21]  J. Lis,et al.  Nuclear run-on assays: assessing transcription by measuring density of engaged RNA polymerases. , 1999, Methods in enzymology.

[22]  N. Proudfoot,et al.  Transcriptional termination signals for RNA polymerase II in fission yeast , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[23]  J. Lis,et al.  Rapid changes in Drosophila transcription after an instantaneous heat shock , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[24]  A. Rougvie,et al.  The RNA polymerase II molecule at the 5′ end of the uninduced hsp70 gene of D. melanogaster is transcriptionally engaged , 1988, Cell.

[25]  Mark Groudine,et al.  A block to elongation is largely responsible for decreased transcription of c-myc in differentiated HL60 cells , 1986, Nature.

[26]  J. Darnell,et al.  Transcriptional and post-transcriptional control of specific messenger RNAs in adult and embryonic liver. , 1984, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  P. Chambon,et al.  Clustering of RNA polymerase B molecules in the 5' moiety of the adult beta-globin gene of hen erythrocytes. , 1981, Nucleic acids research.

[28]  James E. Darnell,et al.  Transcriptional control in the production of liver-specific mRNAs , 1981, Cell.

[29]  S. Weiss,et al.  A MAMMALIAN SYSTEM FOR THE INCORPORATION OF CYTIDINE TRIPHOSPHATE INTO RIBONUCLEIC ACID1 , 1959 .