OVERCOMING BARRIERS TO WRITING: COMPUTER SUPPORT FOR BASIC WRITING SKILLS

Students who find writing challenging often struggle with the basic transcription processes involved in writing, including handwriting or typing, spelling , capitalization, and punctuation. Problems with transcription are important both because they affect written products and because they interfere with students' ability to attend to higher order processes such as planning and evaluation. Computer tools, including word processing, spelling checkers, speech synthesis, word prediction, and speech recognition software, offer support to writers, but they also have limitations. In this article, the benefits and limitations of these tools are analyzed and the available research on their use is discussed.

[1]  K. Wetzel.  Speech-Recognizing Computers , 1996, Journal of learning disabilities.

[2]  Henry Jay Becker,et al.  Teaching with and about computers in secondary schools , 1993, CACM.

[3]  Paul B. Diederich,et al.  Measuring Growth in English , 1974 .

[4]  J. Hayes,et al.  A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing , 1981, College Composition & Communication.

[5]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  Learning Disabled Students' Composing Under Three Methods of Text Production , 1987 .

[6]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  Knowledge of Revision and Revising Behavior among Students with Learning Disabilities , 1991 .

[7]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  Writing and Writing Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities: Review of a Research Program , 1991 .

[8]  Gail J. Gerlach.  Using an Electronic Speller to Correct Misspelled Words and Verify Correctly Spelled Words. , 1991 .

[9]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  Improving Learning Disabled Students' Skills at revising Essays Produced on a Word Processor , 1988 .

[10]  S Graham,et al.  Knowledge of Writing and the Composing Process, Attitude Toward Writing, and Self-Efficacy for Students With and Without Learning Disabilities , 1993, Journal of learning disabilities.

[11]  W. Patrick Dickson,et al.  The Effects on Children’s Writing of Adding Speech Synthesis to a Word Processor , 1992 .

[12]  C. MacArthur,et al.  The Impact of Computers on the Writing Process , 1988, Exceptional children.

[13]  Rena B. Lewis,et al.  Word Processing Tools for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Comparison of Strategies To Increase Text Entry Speed , 1998 .

[14]  Lucy Calkins,et al.  Living between the lines , 1990 .

[15]  Suzanne Hidi,et al.  The comparison of oral and written productions in two discourse types , 1983 .

[16]  Eleanor L. Higgins,et al.  Compensatory Effectiveness of Speech Recognition on the Written Composition Performance of Postsecondary Students with Learning Disabilities , 1995 .

[17]  Marilyn Cochran-Smith,et al.  Word Processing and Writing in Elementary Classrooms: A Critical Review of Related Literature , 1991 .

[18]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  Word Prediction for Students with Severe Spelling Problems , 1999 .

[19]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  A Peer Editor Strategy: Guiding Learning-Disabled Students in Response and Revision , 1993, Research in the Teaching of English.

[20]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  Word Processing with Speech Synthesis and Word Prediction: Effects on the Dialogue Journal Writing of Students with Learning Disabilities , 1998 .

[21]  Joy Kreeft Peyton,et al.  Dialogue Journal Communication: Classroom, Linguistic, Social, and Cognitive Views , 1988 .

[22]  Alan F. Newell,et al.  Effect of the “PAL” word prediction system on the quality and quantity of text generation , 1992 .

[23]  Geoff Cumming,et al.  Evaluating speech-based composition methods: Planning, dictation, and the listening word processor. , 1996 .

[24]  Stephen Graham,et al.  Effects of dictation and advanced planning instruction on the composing of students with writing and learning problems. , 1997 .

[25]  Eleanor L. Higgins,et al.  Effects of Speech Synthesis on the Proofreading Efficiency of Postsecondary Students with Learning Disabilities , 1995 .

[26]  C. MacArthur,et al.  Using Technology to Enhance the Writing Processes of Students with Learning Disabilities , 1996, Journal of learning disabilities.

[27]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  Effects of a reciprocal peer revision strategy in special education classrooms. , 1991 .

[28]  David R. Beukelman,et al.  A comparison of intelligibility among natural speech and seven speech synthesizers with listeners from three age groups , 1990 .

[29]  William D. Schafer,et al.  Evaluation of a Writing Instruction Model that Integrated a Process Approach, Strategy Instruction, and Word Processing , 1995 .

[30]  Martha L. King,et al.  Research Update: Conveying Meaning in Written Texts. , 1981 .

[31]  Roger Mitton,et al.  Spelling checkers, spelling correctors and the misspellings of poor spellers , 1987, Inf. Process. Manag..

[32]  Robert L. Bangert-Drowns,et al.  The Word Processor as an Instructional Tool: A Meta-Analysis of Word Processing in Writing Instruction , 1993 .

[33]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  Spelling Checkers and Students with Learning Disabilities: Performance Comparisons and Impact on Spelling , 1996 .

[34]  S. Graham.  The Role of Production Factors in Learning Disabled Students' Compositions. , 1990 .

[35]  J. Hayes.  A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. , 1996 .

[36]  David McNaughton,et al.  Proofreading for Students with Learning Disabilities: Integrating Computer and Strategy Use , 1997 .

[37]  R. Abbott,et al.  Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. , 1997 .

[38]  Suzanne Rounsefell.  Effects of Listener Training on Intelligibility of Augmentative and Alternative Speech in the Secondary Classroom. , 1993 .

[39]  Gary F. Kohut,et al.  The Effectiveness of Leading Grammar/Style Software Packages in Analyzing Business Students' Writing , 1995 .