Long-hole destress blasting for rockburst control during deep underground coal mining

The Lazy Colliery in the Ostrava–Karvina Coalfield of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin adopted modern longwall technology for an underground extraction of coal seam No. 504. This coal seam is located at a cover depth of around 700 m. The seam thickness varied from 3.1 m to 5.0 m in the selected longwall panel. Two overlying coal seams, Nos. 512 and 530 experienced mining at average heights of 58 m and 75 m, respectively, from the planned working horizon of the seam No. 504. The proposed longwall panel was adversely situated below goaf edges of the workings in these two overlying extracted seams. An analysis of the inter-burden rock mass among these coal seams showed the presence of strong, massive strata of sandstones and conglomerates with uniaxial compressive strength values between 70 MPa and 120 MPa. The stress is measured at different mining stages by Compact Conical-ended Borehole Monitoring (CCBM). A simple laboratory test of the coal sample found a high value of the ratio of the elastic deformation to the total deformation (40.8), indicating the energy-storing characteristic (prone to burst/bump) of the coal seam. Under the existing geo-mining conditions of the site a suitable destress blasting (long-hole drilling and blasting) design is adopted to pre-fracture the identified competent strata from both gate roads in advance. The total length of the panel could be extracted without any bump/rockburst after the destress blasting. The efficiency of the adopted destress blasting at the different mining stages is evaluated in terms seismic effect (SE), which is calculated through the available seismic monitoring data and weight of the charged explosive. A systematic adoption of the destress rock blasting led the 300 m long longwall panel to be smoothly extracted without any further rockbursts.

[1]  M. R. Saharan,et al.  Destress Blasting in Coal Mining - State-of-the-Art Review , 2011 .

[2]  L. Staš,et al.  Conical Strain Gauge Probes For Stress Measurement , 2005 .

[3]  Archana Singh,et al.  Coal pillar extraction at deep cover: With special reference to Indian coalfields , 2011 .

[4]  J. Sanchidrián,et al.  Energy components in rock blasting , 2007 .

[5]  P. Koníček,et al.  Study of selected cases of local stress reduction due to rock blasting , 2008 .

[6]  Karel Holub,et al.  Particle velocity generated by rockburst during exploitation of the longwall and its impact on the workings , 2011 .

[7]  Petr Konecny,et al.  Rock Bursts In the Czech Part of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin - Features, Theoretical Models And Conclusions For Practice , 1999 .

[8]  Rajendra Singh,et al.  Assessment of mining induced stress development over coal pillars during depillaring , 2011 .

[9]  Petr Konicek,et al.  Systems of Rock Blasting as a Rockburst Measure in the Czech Part of Upper Silesian Coal Basin , 2005 .

[10]  Yaodong Jiang,et al.  Acoustic emission and thermal infrared precursors associated with bump-prone coal failure , 2010 .

[11]  Baiquan Lin,et al.  Stress evolution with time and space during mining of a coal seam , 2011 .

[12]  Petr Waclawik,et al.  Measurement of Stress Changes Using a Compact Conical-ended Borehole Monitoring , 2011 .

[13]  Y. Obara,et al.  Updating the use of the CCBO cell in Japan: Overcoring case studies , 2003 .

[14]  Petr Konecny,et al.  Destress rock blasting as a rockburst control technique. , 2011 .

[15]  K.-G. Hinzen,et al.  Comparison of seismic and explosive energy in five smooth blasting test rounds , 1998 .

[16]  Jhareswar Maiti,et al.  An observational approach for assessment of dynamic loading during underground coal pillar extraction , 2011 .