Keeping others in our mind or in our heart? Distribution games under cognitive load

It has recently been argued that giving is spontaneous while greed is calculated (Rand et al., in Nature 489:427–430, 2012). If greed is calculated we would expect that cognitive load, which is assumed to reduce the influence of cognitive processes, should affect greed. In this paper we study both charitable giving and the behavior of dictators under high and low cognitive load to test if greed is affected by the load. This is tested in three different dictator game experiments. In the dictator games we use both a give frame, where the dictators are given an amount that they may share with a partner, and a take frame, where dictators may take from an amount initially allocated to the partner. The results from all three experiments show that the behavioral effect in terms of allocated money of the induced load is small if at all existent. At the same time, follow-up questions indicate that the subjects’ decisions are more impulsive and less driven by their thoughts under cognitive load.

[1]  L. Kohlberg.  Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization , 1969 .

[2]  C. Engel.  Dictator games: a meta study , 2010 .

[3]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[4]  B. Shiv,et al.  Heart and Mind in Conflict: The Interplay of Affect and Cognition in Consumer Decision Making , 1999 .

[5]  Y. Trope,et al.  Effortfulness and flexibility of dispositional judgment processes. , 1997 .

[6]  David G. Rand,et al.  Do people care about social context? Framing effects in dictator games , 2013 .

[7]  N. Bardsley.  Dictator game giving: altruism or artefact? , 2008 .

[8]  Don A. Moore,et al.  Self-Interest, Automaticity, and the Psychology of Conflict of Interest , 2004 .

[9]  Verena Utikal,et al.  Affect and fairness: Dictator games under cognitive load , 2014 .

[10]  David Watson,et al.  The PANAS-X manual for the positive and negative affect schedule , 1994 .

[11]  J. Haidt.  The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.

[12]  D Kahneman,et al.  Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory , 1966, Science.

[13]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Altruism in Anonymous Dictator Games , 1996 .

[14]  Theo Offerman,et al.  Public good provision and public bad prevention: the effect of framing , 1998 .

[15]  Madan M. Pillutla,et al.  Unfairness, Anger, and Spite: Emotional Rejections of Ultimatum Offers , 1996 .

[16]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  The history of dual-process notions, and the future of preconscious control. , 1999 .

[17]  Erik Wengström,et al.  Fast or Fair? A Study of Response Times , 2008 .

[18]  Robin P. Cubitt,et al.  Moral Judgments in Social Dilemmas: How Bad is Free Riding? , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[19]  Richard Cookson,et al.  Framing Effects in Public Goods Experiments , 2000 .

[20]  David G. Rand,et al.  Spontaneous giving and calculated greed , 2012, Nature.

[21]  Robin P. Cubitt,et al.  Framing and Free Riding: Emotional Responses and Punishment in Social Dilemma Games Framing and Free Riding: Emotional Responses and Punishment in Social Dilemma Games , 2022 .

[22]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics , 2005 .

[23]  Siegfried Dewitte,et al.  Bulletin Personality and Social Psychology Are Social Value Orientations Expressed Automatically? Decision Making in the Dictator Game on Behalf Of: Society for Personality and Social Psychology , 2022 .

[24]  Eun Soo Park,et al.  Warm-glow versus cold-prickle: a further experimental study of framing effects on free-riding , 2000 .

[25]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. , 1999 .

[26]  J. Haidt,et al.  The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion , 2014, Utilitas.

[27]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment , 2001, Science.

[28]  Michael T. Ghiselin,et al.  The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex , 1964 .

[29]  Elizabeth W. Dunn,et al.  Spending Money on Others Promotes Happiness , 2008, Science.

[30]  D. Murphey,et al.  The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion , 2013 .

[31]  Dent,et al.  Cognitive Load and the Equality Heuristic: A Two-Stage Model of Resource Overconsumption in Small Groups. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[32]  Daniel T. Gilbert,et al.  Seeing Less and Knowing More The Benefits of Perceptual Ignorance , 1988 .

[33]  D. Schacter,et al.  Do Amnesics Exhibit Cognitive Dissonance Reduction? The Role of Explicit Memory and Attention in Attitude Change , 2001, Psychological science.

[34]  Ronald Bosman,et al.  Emotional Hazard in a Power-to-Take Experiment , 2002 .

[35]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[36]  D T Gilbert,et al.  When comparisons arise. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Frans van Winden,et al.  Affect and Fairness in Economics , 2007 .

[38]  Daniel J. Benjamin,et al.  Who is 'Behavioral'? Cognitive Ability and Anomalous Preferences , 2006 .

[39]  L. Ross,et al.  The Name of the Game: Predictive Power of Reputations versus Situational Labels in Determining Prisoner’s Dilemma Game Moves , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[40]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty , 1982 .

[41]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[42]  Daniel Västfjäll,et al.  Intuition and cooperation reconsidered , 2013, Nature.

[43]  F. Salzano.  Primates and philosophers: how morality evolved , 2007 .

[44]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[45]  Anna L. Peterson.  Good Natured: The Origin of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals , 1998 .

[46]  S. Preston,et al.  Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[47]  D T Gilbert,et al.  The Fleeting Gleam of Praise Cognitive Processes Underlying Behavioral Reactions to Self-Relevant Feedback , 2001 .

[48]  J. Andreoni.  Warm-Glow versus Cold-Prickle: The Effects of Positive and Negative Framing on Cooperation in Experiments , 1995 .

[49]  S. Nowlis,et al.  The Effect of Distractions While Tasting a Food Sample: The Interplay of Informational and Affective Components in Subsequent Choice , 2004 .

[50]  L. Ross,et al.  Naive realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. , 1996 .

[51]  Daniel T. Gilbert,et al.  The fleeting gleam of praise: cognitive processes underlying behavioral reactions to self-relevant feedback. , 1990 .

[52]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[53]  Jordi Brandts,et al.  Frames and Games , 2007 .

[54]  Jonathan Evans.  Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[55]  T. Gärling,et al.  Managers' Tradeoffs Between Equality and Efficiency: Preferences and Emotional Responses , 2010 .

[56]  Anthony Ziegelmeyer,et al.  Framing and cooperation in public good games: an experiment with an interior solution , 1999 .

[57]  W. Güth,et al.  Being of two minds: Ultimatum offers under cognitive constraints , 2011 .

[58]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Animal Spirits: Affective and Deliberative Processes in Economic Behavior , 2004 .

[59]  F. D. Waal,et al.  Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved , 2006 .

[60]  G. Clore,et al.  Mood as Information: 20 Years Later , 2003 .

[61]  R. Petty,et al.  Measuring the Affective and Cognitive Properties of Attitudes: Conceptual and Methodological Issues , 1994 .