Benchmark of Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis on Measuring Nanoparticle Sizing and Concentration

One of the greatest challenges in the manufacturing and development of nanotechnologies is the requirement for robust, reliable, and accurate characterization data. Presented here are the results of an interlaboratory comparison (ILC) brought about through multiple rounds of engagement with NanoSight Malvern and ten pan-European research facilities. Following refinement of the nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) technique, the size and concentration characterization of nanoparticles in liquid suspension was proven to be robust and reproducible for multiple sample types in monomodal, binary, or multimodal mixtures. The limits of measurement were shown to exceed the 30–600 nm range (with all system models), with percentage coefficients of variation (% CV) being calculated as sub 5% for monodisperse samples. Particle size distributions were also improved through the incorporation of the finite track length adjustment (FTLA) algorithm, which most noticeably acts to improve the resolution of multimodal sample mixtures. The addition of a software correction to account for variations between instruments also dramatically increased the accuracy and reproducibility of concentration measurements. When combined, the advances brought about during the interlaboratory comparisons allow for the simultaneous determination of accurate and precise nanoparticle sizing and concentration data in one measurement.

[1]  Marcia McNutt,et al.  Journals unite for reproducibility , 2014, Science.

[2]  Journals unite for reproducibility , 2014, Nature.

[3]  M. Wiemann,et al.  Interlaboratory comparison of size measurements on nanoparticles using nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) , 2013, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[4]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  The long view of nanotechnology development: the National Nanotechnology Initiative at 10 years , 2011 .

[5]  ASPET Journals Support the National Institutes of Health Principles and Guidelines for Reporting Preclinical Research , 2015, The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[6]  Qasim Chaudhry,et al.  Considerations for environmental fate and ecotoxicity testing to support environmental risk assessments for engineered nanoparticles. , 2009, Journal of chromatography. A.

[7]  Standard Guide for Measurement of Particle Size Distribution of Nanomaterials in Suspension by Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis ( NTA ) 1 , 2015 .

[8]  Dik van de Meent,et al.  Considerations on the EU definition of a nanomaterial: science to support policy making. , 2013, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[9]  John G. Walker,et al.  Improved nano-particle tracking analysis , 2012 .

[10]  Lei Wang,et al.  Preparation and electrochemical properties of LiFePO4/C nanoparticles using different organic carbon sources , 2013, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[11]  M. Baker 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility , 2016, Nature.

[12]  Gibson Peter,et al.  Requirements on measurements for the implementation of the European Commission definition of the term 'nanomaterial' , 2012 .