Visual perception of repaired cleft lip scarring face associated with different malocclusions via eye-tracking

Background. This study aimed to evaluate the visual facial perception in response to scars associated with repaired cleft lip (CL) on a male adolescent patient, as assessed via eye-tracking. Methods. Index of orthodontic treatment need (IOTN) malocclusions, grades 1, 5, and 8 were added to the frontal view facial image of an adolescent male model showing asymmetries of the nose and upper lip after CL surgery using the software Photoshop CS5® software. The eye movements of 91 laypeople observers were tracked by an Eye Tribe infrared sensor connected to OGAMA© software. A Kruskal–Wallis test was used to identify differences in total fixation time and time until the first fixation for the areas of interest. A visual analog scale (VAS) of attractiveness was also used in the study. Statistical analysis was performed adopting a significance level of P<0.05. Results. The area of interest (AOI) were found to be the mouth and teeth, which were more focused on gazed at than any other area, regardless of the grade of IOTN. For observers of different ages, there were significant differences in the time until the first fixation on the scar of the repaired CL region for IOTN grade 1 (P=0.007). Images showing IOTN grade 1 repaired CL regions received the highest VAS scores. The older the age, the greater the tendency to give a higher VAS score for the same malocclusion. Conclusion. The presence of a CL scar on the upper lip did not attract the eye of laypeople observers of different ages, regardless of the degree of malocclusion in the non-smile image. The age of the observers did influence the perception of attractiveness, with older observers giving higher scores than younger ones. As the severity of the malocclusion increased, they were found to be less attractive.

[1]  J. T. Newton,et al.  Patients' and parents' expectations of orthodontic treatment in university settings. , 2021, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[2]  C. Flores‐Mir,et al.  Influence of upper lip curvature on smile attractiveness in patients with different degrees of gingival smiles: A cross-sectional study with opinions from oral health providers and laypersons. , 2021, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[3]  H. D. de Vet,et al.  Atypical Outcomes of Nasal and Lip Appearance After Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair: Judgment by Professionals, Patients, and Laypeople , 2021, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[4]  Katherine B. Martin,et al.  Developing an Eye-Tracking Protocol to Determine Children’s Visual Perception of Secondary Cleft Lip Deformity , 2020, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[5]  A. Omair,et al.  Evaluation of facial appearance in patients with repaired cleft lip and palate: comparing the assessment of laypeople and healthcare professionals , 2019, Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

[6]  T. Van Dyke,et al.  Current and Emerging Treatments for Postsurgical Cleft Lip Scarring: Effectiveness and Mechanisms , 2017, Journal of dental research.

[7]  Furkan Dindaroğlu,et al.  Visual perception of faces with unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate: An Eye-Tracking Study. , 2017, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[8]  J. Jayaraman,et al.  Evaluation of Facial Appearance in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate by Laypeople and Professionals: A Systematic Literature Review , 2016, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[9]  B. Guyuron,et al.  Factors Contributing to Facial Asymmetry in Identical Twins , 2014, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  N. Pandis,et al.  Facial attractiveness of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate and of controls assessed by laypersons and professionals. , 2014, European journal of orthodontics.

[11]  A. Aylsworth,et al.  Classification, epidemiology, and genetics of orofacial clefts. , 2014, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[12]  Stephen Richmond,et al.  Three-dimensional quantification of facial symmetry in adolescents using laser surface scanning. , 2014, European journal of orthodontics.

[13]  Stephen R. Sullivan,et al.  Quantitative Facial Asymmetry: Using Three-Dimensional Photogrammetry to Measure Baseline Facial Surface Symmetry , 2014, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[14]  P. Christou,et al.  Aesthetic outcome of cleft lip and palate treatment. Perceptions of patients, families, and health professionals compared to the general public. , 2013, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[15]  E. Chung,et al.  Clinicians and laypeople assessment of facial attractiveness in patients with cleft lip and palate treated with LeFort I surgery or late maxillary protraction. , 2013, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[16]  R. Roberts,et al.  Facial aesthetics and perceived need for further treatment among adults with repaired cleft as assessed by cleft team professionals and laypersons. , 2013, European journal of orthodontics.

[17]  P. Christou,et al.  Appreciation of cleft lip and palate treatment outcome by professionals and laypeople. , 2012, European journal of orthodontics.

[18]  P. Strike,et al.  A simple assessment method for auditing multi-centre unilateral cleft lip repairs. , 2011, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[19]  G. Alpers,et al.  Persons with Cleft Lip and Palate Are Looked at Differently , 2010, Journal of dental research.

[20]  A. Kuijpers-Jagtman,et al.  Nasolabial esthetics in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate after 1- versus 3-stage treatment protocols. , 2009, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[21]  A. Kuijpers-Jagtman,et al.  Effect of Infant Orthopedics on Facial Appearance of Toddlers with Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate (Dutchcleft) , 2008, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[22]  Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman,et al.  Nasolabial appearance in unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate: a comparison with Eurocleft. , 2007, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[23]  E. A. Abu Alhaija,et al.  Factors affecting patient satisfaction after orthodontic treatment. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[24]  Kelly Ritter,et al.  Validity of Subjective Evaluations for the Assessment of Lip Scarring and Impairment , 2002 .

[25]  C. Trotman,et al.  Validity of subjective evaluations for the assessment of lip scarring and impairment. , 2002, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[26]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health? , 2001, Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society.

[27]  R. Kravitz Patients' Expectations for Medical Care: An Expanded Formulation Based on Review of the Literature , 1996, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[28]  K. Kapp-Simon,et al.  Self-concept of primary-school-age children with cleft lip, cleft palate, or both. , 1986, The Cleft palate journal.

[29]  N. R. Bernstein,et al.  Adolescents with cleft palate: body-image and psychosocial problems. , 1981, Psychosomatics.