Management standards and development practice in the South African aid chain

The article addresses how South African non-governmental organisations (NGOs) approach the management of their development activities and the influences upon their approaches. Based on interviews, field visits and programme documents from 40 organisations working in South Africa, the article explores the extent to which NGO programme priorities and adopted management practices arise out of donor conditions, succeed in their stated aims and generate other unintended consequences. Four aspects of contemporary NGO management dynamics are explored: logical frameworks, participatory processes, impact enhancement and financial probity. While donor requirements in these four areas generally impose heavy costs on South African NGOs and poorly achieve their stated aims, the research documents cases, in which local managers were able to work effectively and learn within these constraints, found ways around the more intrusive requirements, or challenged donors to change their policies to permit more equitable donor-recipient relationships and better development practice. However, an unintended impact of tighter funding requirements is an observable differentiation within the South African NGO sector, with smaller community-based organisations excluded as larger professional organisations establish more enduring links with international development organisations. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Des Gasper,et al.  Evaluating the "logical framework approach": towards learning-oriented development evaluation , 2000 .

[2]  M. Andrews,et al.  Sectoral decentralisation and intergovernmental arrangements in Africa , 2003 .

[3]  S. White Depoliticising development: The uses and abuses of participation , 1996 .

[4]  S. Bell Logical frameworks, Aristotle and soft systems: a note on the origins, values and uses of logical frameworks, in reply to Gasper , 2000 .

[5]  R. Sandbrook,et al.  Disciplining Democracy: Development Discourse and Good Governance in Africa , 2000 .

[6]  D. Wield Tools for project development within a public action framework , 1999 .

[7]  P. Smoke Decentralisation in Africa: goals, dimensions, myths and challenges , 2003 .

[8]  J. Hearn The ‘uses and abuses’ of civil society in Africa , 2001 .

[9]  T. Wallace New development agendas: changes in UK NGO policies & procedures , 1997 .

[10]  Andrea Cornwall Making a difference? : gender and participatory development , 2001 .

[11]  J. Aune,et al.  Logical Framework Approach and PRA - mutually exclusive or complementary tools for project planning? , 2000 .

[12]  Albert O. Hirschman Development Projects Observed , 1967 .

[13]  Peter Smith,et al.  A comment on the limitations of the logical framework method, in reply to Gasper, and to Bell , 2000 .

[14]  David L. Dollar,et al.  Assessing aid - what works, what doesn't, and why , 1998 .

[15]  M. Howes Linking paradigms and practice: Key issues in the appraisal, monitoring and evaluation of British NGO Projects , 1992 .

[16]  D. Hulme,et al.  Too Close For Comfort? The Impact of Official Aid on Nongovernmental Organizations , 1996 .