Hydraulic failure and repair are not routine in trees

Trees can pull tons of water up to 100 m above ground, whereas even the best engineered suction pumps can manage only 10 m at most. Beyond this height, the pull of gravity exceeds atmospheric pressure. The pressure at the top of the water column then becomes negative, and pumps drain by a process of vaporization called cavitation. So how do plants, particularly tall trees, cope with cavitation? Do they have an astonishingly high resistance to this process or are they routinely exposed to cavitation events and possess remarkable repair capacities? These questions were first asked when the mechanism of sap ascent in trees was discovered in the late nineteenth century (Brown2013),but were not answereduntil reliable methods for measuring cavitation were introduced a century later. Early studies of plant hydraulics suggested that cavitation occurred only in conditions of severe drought (Fig.1a).However, manystudies carried out inthe last decade

[1]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Global Decline in Large Old Trees , 2012, Science.

[2]  A. Nardini,et al.  Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought , 2012, Nature.

[3]  T. Brodribb,et al.  Hydraulic Failure Defines the Recovery and Point of Death in Water-Stressed Conifers[OA] , 2008, Plant Physiology.

[4]  Melvin T. Tyree,et al.  Plant hydraulics: The ascent of water , 2003, Nature.

[5]  P. Ciais,et al.  Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003 , 2005, Nature.

[6]  N. Holbrook,et al.  Cutting xylem under tension or supersaturated with gas can generate PLC and the appearance of rapid recovery from embolism. , 2013, Plant, cell & environment.

[7]  D. Bowman,et al.  Xylem function and growth rate interact to determine recovery rates after exposure to extreme water deficit. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[8]  M. M. Alsina,et al.  Centrifuge technique consistently overestimates vulnerability to water stress-induced cavitation in grapevines as confirmed with high-resolution computed tomography. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[9]  Hervé Cochard,et al.  Does sample length influence the shape of xylem embolism vulnerability curves? A test with the Cavitron spinning technique. , 2010, Plant, cell & environment.

[10]  N. McDowell,et al.  A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests , 2010 .

[11]  Darlene E. Weingand,et al.  Do We Need a New Paradigm , 1996 .

[12]  A. Nardini,et al.  Refilling of embolized vessels in young stems of laurel. Do We need a new paradigm? , 1999, Plant physiology.

[13]  N. Holbrook,et al.  Embolism repair and xylem tension: Do We need a miracle? , 1999, Plant physiology.

[14]  J. Sperry Cutting-edge research or cutting-edge artefact? An overdue control experiment complicates the xylem refilling story. , 2013, Plant, cell & environment.

[15]  Gene Silberhorn,et al.  Red Maple Acer rubrum L. , 1991 .

[16]  A. Jacobsen,et al.  No evidence for an open vessel effect in centrifuge-based vulnerability curves of a long-vesselled liana (Vitis vinifera). , 2012, The New phytologist.

[17]  Harvey R. Brown,et al.  The Theory of the Rise of Sap in Trees: Some Historical and Conceptual Remarks , 2013, 1404.3066.

[18]  H. Cochard,et al.  Xylem embolism threshold for catastrophic hydraulic failure in angiosperm trees. , 2013, Tree physiology.

[19]  Sylvain Delzon,et al.  Methods for measuring plant vulnerability to cavitation: a critical review. , 2013, Journal of experimental botany.

[20]  Melvin T. Tyree,et al.  A method for measuring hydraulic conductivity and embolism in xylem , 1988 .

[21]  N. Holbrook,et al.  Diurnal variation in xylem hydraulic conductivity in white ash (Fraxinus americana L.), red maple (Acer rubrum L.) and red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.) , 1998 .

[22]  M. Sykes,et al.  Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.