First year engineering students are strikingly impoverished in their self-concept as professional engineers

Fred is Co-Principal Investigator and Director of The Full Potential Initiative, an NSF-funded longitudinal study of the development and influence of implicit attitudes about intellectual ability and academic belonging. His findings have demonstrated that biased implicit associations in the minds of students, teachers and professionals are not simple functions of the stereotypes in their environment, but vary predictably with their personal experiences and identities. Female and male scientists, for example, differ greatly in the strength of their implicit stereotype of science as male (weak stereotyping among the women but strong among the men), even though they are both equally aware of the cultural stereotype. A key ongoing focus of his research is on the causal role that such varying implicit associations may play in shaping identities and contributing to perseverance in scientific studies and careers. Fred’s publication topics have included comparisons of weband laboratory-based implicit cognition experiments, the relationship between implicit and explicit attitude measures, ethnic and gender differences in science graduation at selective colleges, and standardized testing in college admission.

[1]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  A multitrait-multimethod validation of the Implicit Association Test: implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs. , 2007, Experimental psychology.

[2]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  M. Inzlicht,et al.  Do High-Achieving Female Students Underperform in Private? The Implications of Threatening Environments on Intellectual Processing , 2003 .

[4]  A. Kiefer,et al.  Implicit Stereotypes, Gender Identification, and Math-Related Outcomes , 2007, Psychological science.

[5]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method Variables and Construct Validity , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[6]  S. Ceci,et al.  Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. , 2002, Psychological review.

[8]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  A model of dual attitudes. , 2000, Psychological review.

[9]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Implicit Social Cognitions Predict Sex Differences in Math Engagement and Achievement , 2011 .

[10]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  THE GO/NO-GO ASSOCIATION TASK , 2001 .

[11]  A. Greenwald,et al.  The Brief Implicit Association Test. , 2009, Experimental psychology.

[12]  Michael Inzlicht,et al.  A Threatening Intellectual Environment: Why Females Are Susceptible to Experiencing Problem-Solving Deficits in the Presence of Males , 2000, Psychological science.

[13]  Damir Čemerin,et al.  IV , 2011 .

[14]  S. Vandenberg,et al.  Mental Rotations, a Group Test of Three-Dimensional Spatial Visualization , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[15]  J. L. Holland,et al.  Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Careers , 1973 .

[16]  A. van Knippenberg,et al.  The relation between perception and behavior, or how to win a game of trivial pursuit. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  T. Tracey Development of an abbreviated Personal Globe Inventory using item response theory: The PGI-Short , 2010 .

[18]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: IV: What We Know (So Far) about the Method. , 2007 .

[20]  M. White,et al.  Implicit and Explicit Occupational Gender Stereotypes , 2006 .

[21]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. , 2002 .

[23]  Barbara D. Adams,et al.  The dynamic time course of stereotype activation: activation, dissipation, and resurrection. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Nalini Ambady,et al.  “Math is Hard!” The effect of gender priming on women’s attitudes , 2006 .

[25]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[26]  T. Parmenter,et al.  Attitudes Toward People with Intellectual Disabilities , 2004 .