Social Media: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

The ubiquity of social media has had a profound effect on the way we communicate and is of significant importance to society and business. Social media tools have helped break down geographical barriers that once restricted communication and have led to an explosion of e-participation, virtual presence, and online communities. Professional benefits of social media include sharing of information, publicity, and giving and receiving support and advice (AlAlwan et al. 2017; Dwivedi et al. 2015, 2017a; Kapoor and Dwivedi, 2015; Kapoor et al. 2016; Mills et al. 2009; Plume et al. 2016). Consumers have become increasingly empowered to exert an influence on brands through online communities, while businesses are able to acquire rapid feedback and garner insight into individual preferences without observer effects (AlAlwan et al. 2017; Ismagilova et al. 2017; Kapoor et al. 2016; Plume et al. 2016) and use such data for new product development (Rathore et al. 2016). Social media tools also enable citizens to share advice and information with their local community (Oh et al., 2013), from promoting events to searching for lost pets, and aids government engagement with citizens (Alryalat et al. 2017). The radical transformation of communication that has been enabled by social media presents a fascinating environment for academics from all backgrounds. People browse and contribute to their social media accounts regularly using smart devices; some people even prefer to communicate using social media rather than participating in face-to-face interaction. Yet communication using social media might be more challenging as emotions can be difficult to detect and comprehend. Furthermore, the anonymity granted through social media facilitates harmful and socially unacceptable behaviours such as cyberbullying. The volume of valuable datasets available through social media applications has led to the emergence of automated techniques and systems that can analyse the ‘big data’ generated. Analytics help businesses to ensure their social media activities are adding value and helping to accomplish business goals. Analysis of social media content can also help to safeguard society from organized crime but such uses remain a delicate issue. There are also risks of using social media analysis in terms of generalizability, as people might prefer different social media or refrain from social media entirely, which could result in bias and even drawing of the wrong conclusions. With seemingly endless benefits it is easy to overlook the disadvantages of social media, which are an increasingly important consideration as social media platforms continue to proliferate. Social media has facilitated a loss of ownership and control of content as private, public and institutional domains progressively overlap. There is a need for careful balancing of professionalism and freedom of speech to ensure that posts do not cause offence or harm reputations. The quality of social media content is diverse, ranging from facts to ‘fake news’. Inaccurate information can spread around the * Yogesh K. Dwivedi y.k.dwivedi@swansea.ac.uk

[1]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi Social media marketing and advertising , 2015 .

[2]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Social media in marketing: A review and analysis of the existing literature , 2017, Telematics Informatics.

[3]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA) , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Electronic Word of Mouth (eWOM) in the Marketing Context: A State of the Art Analysis and Future Directions , 2017 .

[5]  Emma L. Slade,et al.  Sharing of Sponsored Advertisements on Social Media: A Uses and Gratifications Perspective , 2018, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[6]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model , 2017, Information Systems Frontiers.

[7]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  Community Intelligence and Social Media Services: A Rumor Theoretic Analysis of Tweets During Social Crises , 2013, MIS Q..

[8]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Metamorphosis of Indian electoral campaigns: Modi's social media experiment , 2015 .

[9]  JinKyu Lee,et al.  Web 2.0 Emergency Applications: How Useful Can Twitter be for Emergency Response? , 2009 .

[10]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  A Process Pattern Model for Tackling and Improving Big Data Quality , 2018, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[11]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Use of Social Media in Citizen-Centric Electronic Government Services: A Literature Analysis , 2017, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[12]  A. Bailey Social Media: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. , 2019, Plastic surgical nursing : official journal of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Nurses.

[13]  Banita Lal,et al.  Enhancing Organisational Competitiveness Via Social Media - a Strategy as Practice Perspective , 2018, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[14]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi Pay-per-click advertising: A literature review , 2016 .

[15]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Electronic Word of Mouth (eWOM) in the Marketing Context , 2017 .

[16]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  Analysis of Factors that Influence Customers’ Willingness to Leave Big Data Digital Footprints on Social Media: A Systematic Review of Literature , 2017, Information Systems Frontiers.

[17]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Rogers’ Innovation Adoption Attributes: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Existing Research , 2014, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[18]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Innovation adoption attributes: a review and synthesis of research findings , 2014 .

[19]  Caroline Chan,et al.  Sharing Political Content in Online Social Media: A Planned and Unplanned Behaviour Approach , 2018, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[20]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[21]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  Information control and terrorism: Tracking the Mumbai terrorist attack through twitter , 2011, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[22]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[23]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Social media content and product co-creation: an emerging paradigm , 2016, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[24]  Kyounghee Hazel Kwon,et al.  Cyber-rumor sharing under a homeland security threat in the context of government Internet surveillance: The case of South-North Korea conflict , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[25]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Social Media in the Marketing Context: A State of the Art Analysis and Future Directions , 2016 .

[26]  Nripendra P. Rana,et al.  The Impact of Social Media on Consumers’ Acculturation and Purchase Intentions , 2018, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[27]  P. Vigneswara Ilavarasan,et al.  Detection of Spammers in Twitter marketing: A Hybrid Approach Using Social Media Analytics and Bio Inspired Computing , 2017, Information Systems Frontiers.

[28]  M. N. Ravishankar,et al.  The Perils and Promises of Self-Disclosure on Social Media , 2017, Information Systems Frontiers.

[29]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi Affiliate marketing: An overview and analysis of emerging literature , 2017 .

[30]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Advances in Social Media Research: Past, Present and Future , 2017, Information Systems Frontiers.