Early therapeutic response assessment by 18FDG-positron emission tomography during chemotherapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Isolated residual positivity involving bone is not usually a predictor of subsequent treatment failure

Residual 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) – positron emission tomography (PET) positivity during treatment of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBLC) prospectively identifies a subgroup at high likelihood of subsequent treatment failure. A single institution clinical audit of FDG-PET performance for this indication was undertaken for patients with DLBCL treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy ± radiotherapy. Of 45 eligible patients, 14 (31%) were PET-positive after a median of three chemotherapy cycles (range 1 – 5), of which 10 (71%) progressed at a median of 6.5 months. An interim positive PET was a statistically significant adverse prognostic factor for treatment failure (P < 0.0001, log-rank analysis) with a hazard ratio for a positive interim-treatment PET of 9 (95% confidence interval = 4 – 55) and positive predictive value of 71% and negative predictive value of 90%. Notably, four patients with low-grade FDG-avidity limited to sites previously involved by biopsy-proven osseous lymphoma, remain progression-free (median follow-up 62 months). Low-grade FDG-avidity on interim restaging at sites of bone involvement by DLBCL at diagnosis, appears to be less predictive of disease progression than residual nodal or extra-nodal soft tissue abnormality by PET.

[1]  M. O'Doherty,et al.  FDG-PET after two to three cycles of chemotherapy predicts progression-free and overall survival in high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[2]  Emmanuel Itti,et al.  [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in aggressive lymphoma: an early prognostic tool for predicting patient outcome. , 2005, Blood.

[3]  R. Hustinx,et al.  Evaluation of therapy for lymphoma. , 2005, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[4]  M. M. Mac Manus,et al.  Initial staging of lymphoma with positron emission tomography and computed tomography. , 2005, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[5]  J. Hodler,et al.  Primary lymphoma of bone: MRI and CT characteristics during and after successful treatment. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  O. Israel,et al.  Bone lymphoma: 67Ga scintigraphy and CT for prediction of outcome after treatment. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  M. Andreeff,et al.  Results of treatment with hyper-CVAD, a dose-intensive regimen, in adult acute lymphocytic leukemia. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  V. Gebski,et al.  Osteolymphoma (primary bone lymphoma): an Australian review of 70 cases. Australasian Radiation Oncology Lymphoma Group (AROLG). , 1999, Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine.

[9]  Emili Montserrat,et al.  A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  G. Canellos,et al.  Residual mass in lymphoma may not be residual disease. , 1988, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.