Mechanisms of knowledge transfer

A central goal of cognitive science is to develop a general theory of transfer to explain how people use and apply their prior knowledge to solve new problems. Previous work has identified multiple mechanisms of transfer including (but not limited to) analogy, knowledge compilation, and constraint violation. The central hypothesis investigated in the current work is that the particular profile of transfer processes activated for a given situation depends on both (a) the type of knowledge to be transferred and how it is represented, and (b) the processing demands of the transfer task. This hypothesis was investigated in two laboratory training studies. The results from Experiment 1 show that each mechanism predicts specific behavioural patterns of performance across a common set of transfer tasks. The results from Experiment 2 show that people can adaptively shift between transfer mechanisms depending on their prior knowledge and the characteristics of the task environment. A framework for the development of a general theory of transfer based on multiple mechanisms is proposed and implications of the theory are discussed for measuring and understanding knowledge transfer.

[1]  D. Gentner,et al.  Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity , 1982 .

[2]  John R. Anderson Acquisition of cognitive skill. , 1982 .

[3]  Joanne Lobato Alternative Perspectives on the Transfer of Learning: History, Issues, and Challenges for Future Research , 2006 .

[4]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Skill Acquisition : Compilation of Weak-Method Problem Solutions , 2004 .

[5]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Why do children learn to say “Broke”? A model of learning the past tense without feedback , 2002, Cognition.

[6]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Knowledge Compilation: Mechanisms for the Automatization of Cognitive Skills. , 1980 .

[8]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Complexity and the representation of patterned sequences of symbols. , 1972 .

[9]  Stellan Ohlsson,et al.  Comparing Multiple Paths to Mastery: What is Learned? , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  D. Perkins,et al.  Rocky Roads to Transfer: Rethinking Mechanism of a Neglected Phenomenon , 1989 .

[11]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  The Roles of Similarity in Transfer: Separating Retrievability From Inferential Soundness , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Analogical problem solving , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  The cognitive basis of knowledge transfer. , 1987 .

[14]  Stellan Ohlsson,et al.  Learning from Performance Errors. , 1996 .

[15]  Henry C. Ellis,et al.  Transfer of Learning , 2021, Research in Mathematics Education.

[16]  James M. Royer Theories of the transfer of learning , 1979 .

[17]  Olejnik,et al.  Measures of Effect Size for Comparative Studies: Applications, Interpretations, and Limitations. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[18]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[19]  B. Ross Remindings and their effects in learning a cognitive skill , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  A. Newell Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[21]  S. Cormier,et al.  Transfer of learning: Contemporary research and applications. , 1987 .

[22]  David Klahr,et al.  An information processing analysis of some piagetian experimental tasks , 1970 .

[23]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[24]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Immediate and delayed transfer of training effects in statistical reasoning. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  Douglas R. Hofstadter,et al.  Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies , 1995 .

[26]  L. Quéré Cognition in Practice , 1996 .

[27]  Jaime G. Carbonell,et al.  Derivational analogy: a theory of reconstructive problem solving and expertise acquisition , 1993 .

[28]  S. Ohlsson,et al.  THE COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY OF LEARNING AND DOING ARITHMETIC , 1992 .

[29]  Mark T. Keane On Retrieving Analogues When Solving Problems , 1987 .

[30]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implica-tions , 1999 .

[31]  Lauretta M. Reeves,et al.  The Role of Content and Abstract Information in Analogical Transfer , 1994 .

[32]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Processes for sequence production , 1974 .

[33]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[34]  Susan M. Barnett,et al.  When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  Stellan Ohlsson,et al.  Adaptive search through constraint violations , 1991, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[36]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  Similarity and analogical reasoning: Similarity and Analogical Reasoning , 1989 .

[37]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. , 1989 .

[38]  L. Thurstone,et al.  Factorial Studies Of Intelligence , 1941 .

[39]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The Transfer of Cognitive Skill , 1989 .

[40]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Defining structural similarity , 2005 .

[41]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing , 1977 .

[42]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy , 1983, Cogn. Sci..

[43]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The analogical mind. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[44]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[45]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Use of analogy in a production system architecture , 1989 .

[46]  Richard Catrambone,et al.  The effects of surface and structural feature matches on the access of story analogs. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[47]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The analogical mind. , 1997 .

[48]  Zhe Chen,et al.  Analogical problem solving: a hierarchical analysis of procedural similarity. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[49]  Brian H. Ross,et al.  Effects of principle explanation and superficial similarity on analogical mapping in problem solving. , 1997 .

[50]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Systematicity and Surface Similarity in the Development of Analogy , 1986, Cogn. Sci..

[51]  Stephen Graham,et al.  Explicitly Teaching Strategies, Skills, and Knowledge: Writing Instruction in Middle School Classrooms. , 2002 .

[52]  H A SIMON,et al.  HUMAN ACQUISITION OF CONCEPTS FOR SEQUENTIAL PATTERNS. , 1963, Psychological review.

[53]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Relations, Objects, and the Composition of Analogies , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[54]  L. R. Novick Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[55]  A. Luchins,et al.  New Experimental Attempts at Preventing Mechanization in Problem Solving , 1950 .

[56]  B. Ross This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. , 1987 .

[57]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  T RANSFER OF LEARNING , 1992 .

[58]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Transfer on Trial: Intelligence, Cognition and Instruction , 1993 .