Preferentially Filled Foam Core Corrugated Steel Sandwich Structures for Improved Blast Performance

An experimental/numerical study was conducted to evaluate the blast performance of corrugated core steel sandwich structures with foam fillings. The core was preferentially filled with foam with the objective of creating a structure with superiror blast mitigation properties. Different core filling strategies used in the study are shown in Fig. 1(a). Core topologies were arranged as soft/hard, soft/hard/soft, hard/soft/hard and hard/soft as multilayers towards the blast loading direction. The experimental set-up is shown in figure 1(b). The blast loading was imparted using a shock tube facility and the resulting dynamic event was photographed using a high speed camera. Numerical analyses were performed using ABAQUS/EXPLICIT finite element software. The loading profile and material discretization used for numerical simulation are shown in Fig. 2. The material properties of the face sheets and the corrugations were used for standard low carbon steel material. General purpose humidity cured polyurethane foam was used for filling corrugations. The Johnson Cook material model with strain hardening and Ogden was used in Abaqus as material model for low carbon steel and PU foam, respectively. Numerical models were verified by using deflection data from high speed camera measurements. The experimental and numerical results shown in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4, respectively, illustrate that Soft/hard foam core arrangement strategies are most effective in mitigating blast and give the smallest back face displacements under shock loading.

[1]  D. Agard,et al.  Microtubule nucleation by γ-tubulin complexes , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[2]  Jeong-Ho Kim,et al.  Dynamic response of corrugated sandwich steel plates with graded cores , 2014 .

[3]  Zhenyu Xue,et al.  Mechanical behavior and constitutive modeling of metal cores , 2007 .

[4]  Genevieve Langdon,et al.  The response of sandwich structures with composite face sheets and polymer foam cores to air-blast loading: Preliminary experiments , 2012 .

[5]  R. Chona,et al.  Dynamic Thermo-mechanical Response of Hastelloy X to Shock Wave Loading , 2014 .

[6]  Haydn N. G. Wadley,et al.  Response of metallic pyramidal lattice core sandwich panels to high intensity impulsive loading in air , 2011 .

[7]  Zhenyu Xue,et al.  A comparative study of impulse-resistant metal sandwich plates , 2004 .

[8]  L. Young,et al.  An experimental and numerical study of blast induced shock wave mitigation in sandwich structures , 2013 .

[9]  C. A. Weeks,et al.  Improving honeycomb-core sandwich structures for impact resistance , 1995 .

[10]  M. Ashby,et al.  Cellular solids: Structure & properties , 1988 .

[11]  Min Zhou,et al.  Effect of Facesheet Thickness on Dynamic Response of Composite Sandwich Plates to Underwater Impulsive Loading , 2012 .

[12]  A. Shukla,et al.  Performance of functionally graded sandwich composite beams under shock wave loading , 2012 .

[13]  Vikram Deshpande,et al.  The resistance of metallic plates to localized impulse , 2008 .

[14]  Vikram Deshpande,et al.  Dynamic Response of a Clamped Circular Sandwich Plate Subject to Shock Loading , 2004, Journal of Applied Mechanics.

[15]  Genevieve Langdon,et al.  Large inelastic response of unbonded metallic foam and honeycomb core sandwich panels to blast loading , 2010 .

[16]  Len Schwer,et al.  Optional Strain-Rate Forms for the Johnson Cook Constitutive Model and the Role of the Parameter , 2007 .

[17]  G. Nurick,et al.  Behaviour of sandwich panels subject to intense air blasts – Part 2: Numerical simulation , 2009 .

[18]  Yiannis Andreopoulos,et al.  Blast response simulation of an elastic structure: Evaluation of the fluid–structure interaction effect , 2009 .

[19]  David R Hayhurst,et al.  The response of metallic sandwich panels to water blast , 2007 .

[20]  Arun Shukla,et al.  Effect of plate curvature on blast response of aluminum panels , 2012 .

[21]  C. Resewski,et al.  Properties of new polyimide foams and polyimide foam filled honeycomb composites , 2003 .

[22]  Guruswami Ravichandran,et al.  An experimental investigation of shock wave propagation in periodically layered composites , 2003 .

[23]  Arun Shukla,et al.  Blast Mitigation in a Sandwich Composite Using Graded Core and Polyurea Interlayer , 2012 .

[24]  Renfu Li,et al.  Nonlinear Response of a Shallow Sandwich Shell With Compressible Core to Blast Loading , 2008 .

[25]  Arun Shukla,et al.  Experimental and numerical study of foam filled corrugated core steel sandwich structures subjected to blast loading , 2014 .

[26]  A. Shukla,et al.  Experimental study on the response of graded corrugated steel armor to shock loading , 2015 .

[27]  T. Homae,et al.  REDUCTION OF EXPLOSION DAMAGE USING SAND OR WATER LAYER , 2008 .

[28]  Hassan Mahfuz,et al.  Low Velocity Impact Response of Resin Infusion Molded Foam Filled Honeycomb Sandwich Composites , 1998 .

[29]  Chad A. Ulven,et al.  Impact Damage of Partially Foam-filled Co-injected Honeycomb Core Sandwich Composites , 2003 .

[30]  Vikram Deshpande,et al.  The Dynamic Strength of a Representative Double Layer Prismatic Core: A Combined Experimental, Numerical, and Analytical Assessment , 2010 .

[31]  Zhenyu Xue,et al.  Preliminary assessment of sandwich plates subject to blast loads , 2003 .

[32]  K. Pearson VII. Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents , 1895, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[33]  Zhihua Wang,et al.  Dynamic response of metallic lattice sandwich structures to impulsive loading , 2012 .

[34]  N. Fleck,et al.  The Resistance of Clamped Sandwich Beams to Shock Loading , 2004 .

[35]  Arun Shukla,et al.  The blast resistance of sandwich composites with stepwise graded cores , 2009 .